‘-기는’ 용언 반복 구문에 대한 초점 분석
The Focus Analysis on the ‘-Kinun’ Predicate Repetition Construction
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Kim, keonhee. 2020. The Focus Analysis on the ‘-Kinun’ Predicate Repetition Construction. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 45-1, 1-19. This paper analyzes the focus in the ‘-kinun’predicate repetition construction, the marked presupposition which exhibits nominalizing(assimilation to the term), preposing, morphological marking projects the various focus, term focus, predicate focus, in particular, verum focus which had been not dealt with in the previous studies. In some previous thesis, there were emphasis on the predicate due to predicate repetition in the ‘-kinun’predicate repetition construction, but we show the correlation of focus, repetition, emphasis explicitly. The condition of repetition is only if it is focus and the repetitive focus is emphasized regardless of term(argument) or predicate. In the ‘-kinun’predicate repetition construction, predicate focus coexists with verum focus on the basis of the characteristics of the predicate focus as default focus(Zimmermann(2016)), the negation of proposition appeared in the ellipsis of predicate, the presupposition which is the form of complete proposition, the answer of yes-no question. (Seowon University)
Abstract
Kim, keonhee. 2020. The Focus Analysis on the ‘-Kinun’ Predicate Repetition Construction. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 45-1, 1-19. This paper analyzes the focus in the ‘-kinun’predicate repetition construction, the marked presupposition which exhibits nominalizing(assimilation to the term), preposing, morphological marking projects the various focus, term focus, predicate focus, in particular, verum focus which had been not dealt with in the previous studies. In some previous thesis, there were emphasis on the predicate due to predicate repetition in the ‘-kinun’predicate repetition construction, but we show the correlation of focus, repetition, emphasis explicitly. The condition of repetition is only if it is focus and the repetitive focus is emphasized regardless of term(argument) or predicate. In the ‘-kinun’predicate repetition construction, predicate focus coexists with verum focus on the basis of the characteristics of the predicate focus as default focus(Zimmermann(2016)), the negation of proposition appeared in the ellipsis of predicate, the presupposition which is the form of complete proposition, the answer of yes-no question. (Seowon University)
참고문헌 (59)
- 구현정, "‘-기는’ 구문의 문법화", 담화와 인지, 19(3), pp.1~28 (2012), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- 권재일, "강조법과 그 실현 방법", 인문과학논총, 19, pp.57~73 (1987)
- 김건희, "형용사의 주격중출 구문과 여격 주어 구문에 대하여", 한말연구, 13, pp.1~37 (2003), 한말연구학회
- 김건희, "선행절에 어미 ‘-지’가 결합된 절이 나타나는 문장에 대한 연구", 한글, (303), pp.115~146 (2014), 한글학회
- 김건희, "주격중출 구문에 대한 일고찰 - 정보구조와 문장 확대 구성 관점을 중심으로-", 우리말글, 76, pp.1~33 (2018), 우리말글학회[DOI]
- 김건희, "‘-기는’ 용언 반복 구문의 정보 분할과 분열문", 언어학, (83), pp.3~25 (2019), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 김민국, "한국어의 격조사와 초점 - 주격과 대격을 중심으로 -", 國語學, (78), pp.165~219 (2016), 국어학회[DOI]
- 박철우, "한국어 정보구조에서의 화제와 초점" (2003), 역락
- 박철우, "보조사의 기능과 정보구조", 國語學, (73), pp.269~307 (2015), 국어학회[DOI]
- ’ 구문에 대한 비교 연구와 스페인어 교육에서의 활용, "스페인어문학", 2011, 103~127, pp.한국스페인어문학회
- 이금희, "국어 서술어(구)의 초점화와 주제화에 관한 연구 - ‘-기를, -기는’ 구성 중심으로", 한국어 의미학, 49, pp.87~108 (2015), 한국어의미학회
- 이수연, "동일 어간 반복 구문의 의미 특성-‘V-기는 V, V-기만 V’ 구문을 중심으로", 한국어 의미학, 46, pp.141~161 (2014), 한국어의미학회
- 이정훈, "‘V-기’ 반복 구문의 유형과 그 형성 동기 및 과정", 어문학, (122), pp.155~180 (2013), 한국어문학회
- 이정훈, "동사구 주제화 구문의 통사론", 國語學, (72), pp.205~233 (2014), 국어학회[DOI]
- 이해윤, "한국어의 진리치초점", 독어학, (34), pp.185~209 (2016), 한국독어학회[DOI]
- 임동훈, "‘은", 는’과 종횡의 의미 관계, 2012, pp.(64), 217~271[DOI]
- 임성규, "강조법의 문법적 위상과 변별 기준", 한글, 206, pp.115~140 (1989), 한글학회
- 임홍빈, "명사화의 의미특성에 대하여", 국어학, 2, pp.83~104 (1974), 국어학회
- 임홍빈, "한국어의 주제와 통사 분석: 주제 개념의 새로운 전개" (2007), 서울대학교 출판부
- 전영철, "대조 화제와 대조 초점의 표지 ‘는’", 한글, (274), pp.171~200 (2006), 한글학회
- 전영철, "한국어의 제언문", 정언문 구별과 정보구조, 2013, pp.(68), 99~133[DOI]
- 전정미, "한국어 구어에 나타난 강조법 연구", 한말연구, (23), pp.367~391 (2008), 한말연구학회[DOI]
- 최기용, "한국어의 용언 반복 구문(Echoed verb constructions): 용언의 가시적 이동을 위한 또 하나의 근거", 생성문법연구, 12(1), pp.139~168 (2002), 한국생성문법학회
- 최윤지, "구어에서 유의미하게 나타나는 어떤 통사구성에 대하여: 준분열문", 國語學, (79), pp.187~237 (2016), 국어학회[DOI]
- 함병호, "정보구조의 분절 방법", 동악어문학, (67), pp.311~338 (2016), 동악어문학회
- 허 웅, "우리 옛말본" (1975), 정음사
- Arregi, K, "The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure", pp.185~202 (2016), Oxford University Press
- Büring, D, "On d-trees, beans, and b-accents", Linguistics and Philosophy, 26(5), pp.511~545 (2003)
- Büring, D, "The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure", pp.64~85 (2016), Oxford University Press
- Carlson, L, "Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Anaphora" (1983), Reidel
- Chafe, W, "Topics and Point of View: Subject and Topic", pp.25~56 (1976), Academic Press
- Chomsky, N, "Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar", pp.69~119 (1972), Mouton
- Dik, S. C, "Part I:The Structure of the Clause" (1997), Mouton de Gruyter
- Dik, S. C, "Perspectives on Functional Grammar", pp.41~74 (1981), Foris
- Drubig, H. B, "Towards a typology of focus constructions", pp.2000
- Drubig, H. B, "Toward a Typology of Focus and Focus Constructions", Linguistics, 41, pp.1~50 (2003)
- Erteschik-Shir, N, "The Dynamics of Focus Structure" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Féry, C, "The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure", pp.1~18 (2016), Oxford University Press
- Gundel, J. K, "Studies in syntactic typology", pp.209~239 (1988), John Benjamins
- Halliday, M. A. K, "Intonation and Grammar in British English" (1967), Mouton
- Hengeveld, K, "Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Jackendoff, R, "Semantic Interpretation in Genarative Grammar" (1972), MIT Press
- Krifka, M, "Basic Notions of Information Structure", Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55, pp.243~276 (2008)
- Krifka, M, "The expression of information structure", pp.1~44 (2012)
- Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View 1, "The Semantics", pp.1999, Lee, Chungmin
- Lee, J.-S, "A Study on Predicate Clefting", Studies in Generative Grammar, 5(2), pp.531~584 (1995)
- McCloskey, J, "Transformational Syntax and Model Theoretic Semantics" (1979), Reidel
- Neeleman, Ad, "The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure", pp.383~401 (2016), Oxford University Press
- No Yongkyoon, "Negative morphemes in Korean: Evidence for a derivational treatment", Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Korean Linguistics, pp.556~567 (1998), Department of East Asian Studies, University of Toronto
- Paul, H, "Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte" (1995), Niemeyer
- Rochemont, M, "The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure", pp.41~63 (2016), Oxford University Press
- Rooth, M, "A theory of focus interpretation", Natural Language Semantics, 1, pp.75~116 (1992)
- Rothstein, S, "Predicates and their subjects" (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Sæbø, kjell Johan, "The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure", pp.128~146 (2016), Oxford University Press
- Sasse, H. J, "The Thetic", Categorical Distinction Revisited, 1987, pp.25, 511~580
- Surányi, B, "The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure", pp.422~440 (2016), Oxford University Press
- 이철승, "The Oxford Handbook of Poverty and Society", pp.86~107 (2016), Oxford University Press
- Wagner, M, "Contrastive Topics Decomposed", Semantics and Pragmatics, 5(8), pp.1~54 (2012)
- Zimmermann, M, "The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure", pp.314~335 (2016), Oxford University Press