Kes-copular construction in Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Jae-Il Yeom. 2020. Kes-copula construction in Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 45-4, 941-976. In this paper, I discuss what I call a kes-copula construction (KCC) and propose how the construction is analyzed. A KCC characterizes a situation described by a previous sentence in a different way by replacing an expression in a previous sentence with a new one. The new expression can be a word or a phrase. There are two mechanisms involved in this characterization. One is a predication relation which is expressed by the copula and the kes-phrase. The copula has a subject, null or overt, which refers to a situation described by a previous sentence and the kes-phrase denotes a property of situations. Therefore the two sentences describe the same situation. The other is that the new expression is focused. It introduces an alternative and the KCC triggers a presupposition from that alternative and the rest of the kes-phrase. If the presupposition is satisfied by a previous sentence, we can identify correspondence relations between expressions in the previous sentence and those in the kes-phrase. The new expression in the kes-phrase is predicated of the semantic entity introduced by the corresponding expression in the previous sentence in a different way. I call the new expression a dynamic predicate, which is a new notion, and the semantic entity introduced by the corresponding expression the target subject. (Hongik University)
Abstract
Jae-Il Yeom. 2020. Kes-copula construction in Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 45-4, 941-976. In this paper, I discuss what I call a kes-copula construction (KCC) and propose how the construction is analyzed. A KCC characterizes a situation described by a previous sentence in a different way by replacing an expression in a previous sentence with a new one. The new expression can be a word or a phrase. There are two mechanisms involved in this characterization. One is a predication relation which is expressed by the copula and the kes-phrase. The copula has a subject, null or overt, which refers to a situation described by a previous sentence and the kes-phrase denotes a property of situations. Therefore the two sentences describe the same situation. The other is that the new expression is focused. It introduces an alternative and the KCC triggers a presupposition from that alternative and the rest of the kes-phrase. If the presupposition is satisfied by a previous sentence, we can identify correspondence relations between expressions in the previous sentence and those in the kes-phrase. The new expression in the kes-phrase is predicated of the semantic entity introduced by the corresponding expression in the previous sentence in a different way. I call the new expression a dynamic predicate, which is a new notion, and the semantic entity introduced by the corresponding expression the target subject. (Hongik University)
참고문헌 (48)
- Bolinger, Dwight L, "That's That" (1972), Mouton
- Carlson, Lauri, "Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis" (1983), D. Reidel Publishing Company
- Carston, R, "Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality", pp.155~181 (1988), Cambridge University Press
- Carston, R, "Metalinguistic negation and echoic use", Journal of Linguistics, 25, pp.309~330 (1996)
- Chierchia, Gennaro, "Reference to kinds across languages", Natural Language Semantics, 6(4), pp.339~405 (1998)
- Curme, George O, "A Grammar of the English Language. 2 vols" (1931), D.C. Heath
- Declerck, Renaat, "The inferential it is that-construction and its congeners", Lingua, 87, pp.203~230 (1992)
- Donnellan, Keith S, "Reference and definite descriptions", Philosophical Review, 75(3), pp.281~304 (1966)
- Drubig, Hans Bernhar, "Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340: Sprachtheoretische Grundlagen der Computerlinguistik 51" (1994)
- Geurts, B, "he mechanisms of denial", Language, 74, pp.274~307 (1998)
- Heim, I, "Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language", pp.164~190 (1983), De Gruyter
- Heim, I, "E-Type oronouns and donkey anaphora", Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, pp.137~178 (1990)
- Higgins, R, "The pseudo-cleft construction in English", Ph.D, pp.1973
- Horn, L, "A Natural History of Negation" (2001), University of Chicago Press
- Irene Heim, "The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases", PhD, pp.1982
- Jhang, Sea-Eun, "Headed Nominalizations in Korean: Relative Clauses, Clefts, and Comparatives", Doctor, pp.1994
- Kadmon, Nirit, "Uniqueness", Linguistics and Philosophy, 13(3), pp.273~324 (1990)
- Kang, Soyeng, "Myengsakwu Pomwunkwusenguy Mwunpephwa. (Grammaticalization of Clausal Complements in NPs.)" (2004), Hankwukmwunhwasa
- Kiss, K. E ́, "Identificational focus vs. information focus", Language, 74(2), pp.245~273 (1998)
- Krifka, M, "Informationsstruktur und Grammatik", pp.17~53 (1992), Westdeutscher Verlag
- Kripke, S, "Identity and Individuation", pp.135~164 (1971), New York University Press
- Kripke, S. A, "Studies in the Philosophy of Language", pp.255~296 (1977), University of Minnesota Press
- Kuroda, Shige-Yuki, "A Festschrift for Morris Halle", pp.377~391 (1973), Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc
- Lewis, D, "Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic", Journal of Philosophy, 65, pp.113~126 (1968)
- Lewis, David., "On the Plurality of Worlds" (1986), Blackwell
- Lewis, K, "Discourse dynamics, pragmatics, and indefinites", ms, pp.2010
- Montague, R, "The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary" (1973)
- Reprinted in Montague, "Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, edited and with an introduction by Richmond Thomason", pp.247~270 (1974), Yale Univ. Press
- Nam, Kilim, "Hyentaykwuke ita kwumwun yenkwu. (Study on ita construction in Modern Korean.)" (2004), Hankwukmwukhwasa
- Otake, Yoshio, "Semantics and functions of the it is that-construction and the Japanese no da-construction", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 43, pp.143~157 (2001)
- 박나리, "‘-는 것이다’ 구문 연구 -문법기능과 담화기능 그리고 화자의 담화전략의 상관성을 중심으로-", 國語學, (65), pp.251~279 (2012), 국어학회[DOI]
- Pak, Soyeng, "Issues in Korean Text Science" (2001), Yeklak
- 박소영, "‘이다’와 한국어 초점 구문에 대하여", 國語學, (71), pp.3~32 (2014), 국어학회[DOI]
- Partee, B. H, "Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language", pp.361~383 (1983), Walter de Gruyter
- Partee, B, "Nominal and temporal anaphora", Linguistics and Philosophy, 7, pp.243~286 (1984)
- Partee, B, "Compositionality in Formal Semantics: Selected Papers by Barbara H. Partee", pp.203~230 (1987), Blackwell Publishing
- Pitts, A, "Exploring a ‘pragmatic ambiguity’ of negation", Language, 87, pp.346~368 (2009)
- Recanati, F, "Referential", Attributive: A Contextualist Proposal, 1989, pp.56(3), 217~249
- Russell, B, "Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy" (1919), George Allen and Unwin
- Sin, Senkyeng, "On the construction of ‘kes-i-ta’", Korean linguistics, 23, pp.119~158 (1993)
- Sperber, D, "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" (1986), Harvard University Press
- Szabó, Zoltán G, "Descriptions and uniqueness", Philosophical Studies, 101, pp.29~57 (2000)
- Tanomura, Tadaharu, "Gendai Nihongo no Bunpou I: 'NO DA' no Imi to Youhou" (1990), Izumi Shoten
- 염재일, "소위 강조구문과 "것"의 의미", 언어와 정보, 18(2), pp.103~122 (2014), 한국언어정보학회
- 염재일, "Gapless Adnominal Clauses in Korean and their Interpretations", 어학연구, 51(3), pp.597~627 (2015), 언어교육원
- "Stage-denoting and individual-denoting internally headed relative clauses in Korean" (2015)[URL]
- 염재일, "Coerced Relative Clauses in Korean", 어학연구, 53(2), pp.287~320 (2017), 언어교육원
- "Pseudoclefts in Korean and non-contextual meanings"[URL]