수사 면담의 언어학적 접근 - 일본 재심 사건을 중심으로
A Linguistics Approach of Investigative Interview.
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, it was found that false confessions in recent Japanese retrial cases were related to human interviews focusing on Linguistics structure. This study analyzed the case of the Japanese retrial case, the Asikaga case, in Forensic linguistics. In particular, the suspect of the Asikaga case appears to have considered the specific appropriateness of the investigator's question. This was claimed by Austin (1962), indicating that the result of the interaction of the participants was a ‘Speech Act’. The ‘Speech Act’ appears through repeated and induced questions from the investigator, and the suspect has no choice but to answer such questions. This means that even in the same sentence, the sentence is interpreted differently by considering the context in which it is actually spoken. In this study, the actual case analysis analyzed a series of questions from investigator and interviews with suspect in a series of Forensic linguistic analyses, and found the following results. This study, with the Forensic Linguistics approach Discourse Analysis, was able to analyse the false confessions as a ‘conformity condition’ referred to by the recognized Austin (1962). This could be described as an ‘locutionary act-illocutionary act-perlocutionary act’. In the future, it is expected to be a basic study of Forensic linguistics, which investigates the risk of rapport building as a question of the investigator in an investigative interview that prevents suspects from making false confessions.
Abstract
In this study, it was found that false confessions in recent Japanese retrial cases were related to human interviews focusing on Linguistics structure. This study analyzed the case of the Japanese retrial case, the Asikaga case, in Forensic linguistics. In particular, the suspect of the Asikaga case appears to have considered the specific appropriateness of the investigator's question. This was claimed by Austin (1962), indicating that the result of the interaction of the participants was a ‘Speech Act’. The ‘Speech Act’ appears through repeated and induced questions from the investigator, and the suspect has no choice but to answer such questions. This means that even in the same sentence, the sentence is interpreted differently by considering the context in which it is actually spoken. In this study, the actual case analysis analyzed a series of questions from investigator and interviews with suspect in a series of Forensic linguistic analyses, and found the following results. This study, with the Forensic Linguistics approach Discourse Analysis, was able to analyse the false confessions as a ‘conformity condition’ referred to by the recognized Austin (1962). This could be described as an ‘locutionary act-illocutionary act-perlocutionary act’. In the future, it is expected to be a basic study of Forensic linguistics, which investigates the risk of rapport building as a question of the investigator in an investigative interview that prevents suspects from making false confessions.
참고문헌 (57)
- 강욱, "산업기술·영업비밀 유출(의심)자에 대한 효과적인 면담 방안", 경찰학연구, 15(2), pp.105~126 (2015), 경찰대학[DOI]
- 고영신, "시사만화의 정치적 의제 설정과 프레임 구성에 대한 연구", 언론과 사회, 16(2), pp.37~73 (2008), 사단법인 언론과 사회
- 언어행위 이론과 법적용 - 법의 화용론적 차원에 관하여, "김기영", 한국연구재단, ~ (2019)
- 김시업, "수사면담 시 라포가 진술의 양에 미치는 영향", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 24(1), pp.149~166 (2010), 한국사회및성격심리학회[DOI]
- 도선희, "보이스피싱(Voice Phishing)의 음성학적 고찰", 범죄수사학연구, 4(1), pp.67~90 (2018), 범죄수사연구원
- 원혜욱, "유전자감정결과의 증거사용에 관하여", 형사정책연구, pp.5~23 (2001)
- 이성범, "소통의 화용론: 커뮤니케이션에 대한 화용적 접근" (2015), 한국문화사
- 이 윤, "수사관의 용의자 면담유형 분류 및 수사면담유형 평가척도의 개발", 박사, pp.2015
- 이해윤, "화행이론에 의한 협박죄 분석", 텍스트언어학, 41, pp.219~244 (2016), 한국텍스트언어학회[DOI]
- 임석원, "유전자활용에 따른 형사법적 문제점과 개선방안 - 범죄수사를위한 유전자채취와 활용에 대한 문제점을 중심으로 -", 법학연구, (53), pp.27~60 (2014), 한국법학회
- 장석진, "한국어 화행동사의 분석과 분류", 어학연구, 23(3), pp.307~339 (1987)
- 정인수, "국어 수행동사의 의미 기능", 한민족어문학, 28, pp.55~70 (1995)
- Austin, J, L, "How to do things with words" (1962), Harvard University Press
- Borum, R, "International developments in investigative interviewing", pp.137~152 (2013), Willan
- Buckwalter, A, "Interviews and Interrogations" (1983), Butterworths
- Coulthard, M, "An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence" (2016), Routledge
- Collins, R, "The effect of rapport in forensic interviewing", Psychiatry, psychology and law, 9(1), pp.69~78 (2002)
- E. Fobbe, "Forensische Linguistik - Eine Einführung. (Forensic Linguistics - An Introduction)", Narr Frankcke Attempto Verlag
- Entman, R. M, "Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm", Journal of Communication, 43(4), pp.51~58 (1991)
- Forrest, K. D, "The role of pre-existing stress on false confessions: An empirical study", Journal of Credibility Assessment and Witness Psychology, 3, pp.23~45 (2002)
- Geiselman, R. E, "Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview", Journal of Police Science & Administration (1984)
- Gudjonsson, G. H, "The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook" (2003), John Wiley & Sons
- Gudjonsson, G. H, "Suspect interviews and false confessions", Current directions in psychological science, 20(1), pp.33~37 (2011)
- Gudjonsson, G. H, "How frequently do false confessions occur? An empirical study among prison inmates", Psychology, Crime, and Law, 1, pp.21~26 (1994)
- Gudjonsson, G. H, "The role of personality in relation to confessions and denials", Psychology, Crime, and Law, 10, pp.125~135 (2004)
- Kassin, S. M, "The psychology of confession evidence", American Psychologist, 52, pp.221~233 (1997)
- Kassin, S. M, "Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations", Law and human behavior, 34(1), pp.3~38 (2010)
- Kissine, M, "Speech act classifications", Pragmatics of speech actions, 173, pp.202~ (2013)
- Keats, D.M, "Skilled Interviewing" (1993), Australian Council for Educational Research
- Klaver, J. R, "Effects of personality, interrogation techniques and plausibility in an experimental false confession paradigm", Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13(1), pp.71~88 (2008)
- Metzler, K, "Creative Interviewing" (1989), Prentice Hall
- Loftus, E.F, "Eyewitness Testimony" (1996), Harvard University Press
- Newberry, J.J, "Advanced Interviewing Techniques" (1990), Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms National Academy
- Searle, J. R, "Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language (Vol. 626)" (1969), Cambridge university press
- Shawyer, A, "International developments in investigative interviewing", pp.24~38 (2009), Willan Publishing
- Shuy, R. W, "The language of confession, interrogation, and deception Vol. 2", pp.2~ (1998), Sage
- Skolnick, J. H, "The ethics of deceptive interrogation", Criminal Justice Ethics, 11, pp.3~13 (1992)
- "足利事件における警察捜査の問題点等について" (2010)[URL]
- 金秉俊, "虚位自白の心理構造", 法と心理, 4(1) (2005)
- 日本弁護士連合会, "裁判員制度と取調べの可視化" (2004), 明石書店
- 日本弁護士連合会, "取調べの可視化取調べの全過程の録画の実現に向けてー可視化反対論を批判する" (2008), 日本弁護士連合会
- 高木光太郎, "足利事件の虚偽自白事例から取調べの科学化について考える", 法と心理, 4(１) (2012)
- 週刊現代, "直撃 足利事件 冤罪を作った｢警察官ㆍ検事ㆍ裁判官の実名-", ~ (2009)
- 読売新聞, "足利事件再審で菅家さんに無罪判決…宇都宮地裁”. 読売新聞アーカイブ", ~ (2010)
- 佐藤博史, "足利事件の取調べテープが教える取調べの技術一取調べ可視化の究極の課題", 日本法学, 76, pp.1129~1267 (2011)
- 里見繁, "冤罪をつくる検察、それを支える裁判所そして冤罪はなくならない" (2010), インパクト出版会
- "取調べの録音・録画の試行の検証について" (2009)[URL]
- 産経新聞, "足利事件、再審決定”. 産経新聞アーカイブ", ~ (2009)
- 下野新聞社編集局, "冤罪足利事件一｢らせんの事実｣を追った四〇〇日" (2010), 下野新聞社
- 浜田寿美男, "自自の心理学" (2002), 岩波書店
- 浜田寿美男, "自白はつくられる冤罪事件に出会った心理学者" (2017), ミネルヴァ書房
- "일본법무성"[URL]
- "일본경찰청"[URL]
- "일본변호사연합회"[URL]
- "일본최고검찰청"[URL]
- "미국 이노센트 프로젝트"[URL]