Argument-Centered Analysis for Scrambling
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Scrambling in Korean and Japanese has long been treated as an instance of movement, in an attempt to make all the languages share the same configuration in a deep level. In the paper, I claim that English and Korean/Japanese use different mode of syntactic combination instead of having the same configuration. While predicates select arguments in English, arguments select predicates in Korean and Japanese. The information of case markers helps them to find an appropriate predicate. The argument centered combination allow free word order in those languages. The order between arguments does not affect selection of a predicate. The subject-object order and the object-subject order selects the same ranges of predicates; transitive or ditransitive predicates. Long scrambling uses the information of the complementizer ko. It fills the semantic value(s) of a direct object, an indirect object, or both of them when its clause misses them, using the semantic value(s) of argument(s) in the left.
Abstract
Scrambling in Korean and Japanese has long been treated as an instance of movement, in an attempt to make all the languages share the same configuration in a deep level. In the paper, I claim that English and Korean/Japanese use different mode of syntactic combination instead of having the same configuration. While predicates select arguments in English, arguments select predicates in Korean and Japanese. The information of case markers helps them to find an appropriate predicate. The argument centered combination allow free word order in those languages. The order between arguments does not affect selection of a predicate. The subject-object order and the object-subject order selects the same ranges of predicates; transitive or ditransitive predicates. Long scrambling uses the information of the complementizer ko. It fills the semantic value(s) of a direct object, an indirect object, or both of them when its clause misses them, using the semantic value(s) of argument(s) in the left.
참고문헌 (15)
- Boskovic, Z., "Scrambling and last resort", Linguistic Inquiry, 29, pp.347~366 (1998)
- Bouchard,D., "Integral minimalism", Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, 192, pp.3~32 (1997)
- Bouchard,D., "The concept of 'universal' and the case of Japanese", Lingua, 111, pp.247~277 (2001)
- Choi,Y., "Dependent Marking Parameter: Coordination, Clefting, Fragments and Scrambling in Korean and Japanese", 박사, pp.2007
- Choi,Y., "Argument Cluster Coordination and Constituency Test (Non)-Conflicts" (2006), NELS 37
- Kempson,R., "Dynamic Syntax: The Flow of Language Understanding" (2001), Blackwell
- Kiaer,J., "Pro-active parsing of Korean scrambling", WCCFL, 24, pp.209~217 (2006)
- Miyagawa,S., "Against optional scrambling", Linguistic Inquiry, 28, pp.1~25 (1997)
- Miyagawa,S., "A movement scrambling and options without optionality, Word Order and Scrambling", pp.177~200 (2003), Blackwell
- Phillips,C., "Linear order and constituency", Linguistic Inquiry, 34(1), pp.37~90 (2003)
- Saito,M., "Scrambling as semantically vacuous A'-movement, Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure", pp.182~200 (1989), University of Chicago
- Saito,M., "Long distance scrambling in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.69~118 (1992)
- Saito,M., "Improper adjunction", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 24, pp.263~293 (1994)
- Saito,M., "A derivational approach to the interpretation of scrambling chains", Lingua, 113, pp.481~518 (2003)
- Yatabe,S., "Long-distance scrambling via partial compaction", Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics, 2, pp.303~317 (1996)