한국어 종결어미 ‘-네’에 대한 여전히 다른 생각: 정경숙(2014)에 대한 답변
Revisiting the Korean Sentence-Final Suffix –Ney Once More: Response to Chung (2014)
2
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Kwon, Iksoo. 2015. Revisiting the Korean Sentence-Final Suffix –Ney Once More: Response to Chung (2014). Korean Journal of Linguistics, 40-3, 287-305. This squib aims to show that Chung’s (2014) efforts to undermine Kwon’s (2013) counterargument against her original claim (Chung 2012) with regard to the identity of the sentence final suffix -ney are not successful. Her argument that -ney is not an epistemic modal marker loses its ground in that it DOES interact with epistemic modal adverbials, in that -ta does not belong to the same grammatical paradigm as –ney (rather, -e/-a does), and in that -ney still accompanies with conceptual distancing. Furthermore, another main claim of Chung (2014), which is that -ney should be given an assertive mood marker indicating that the proposition in question is informative to the speaker, would not be convincing until Chung provides clearer explanation of relationship between the categories of assertive mood and of her own ‘spatial deictic tense,’ the latter of which she originally claims -ney belongs to. Based on the discussion, this squib suggests that -ney can still be claimed to be an epistemic modal marker with mirativity and further shows that its conceptual distancing actually accounts for some seemingly non-canonical examples in Chung’s accounts (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies).
Abstract
Kwon, Iksoo. 2015. Revisiting the Korean Sentence-Final Suffix –Ney Once More: Response to Chung (2014). Korean Journal of Linguistics, 40-3, 287-305. This squib aims to show that Chung’s (2014) efforts to undermine Kwon’s (2013) counterargument against her original claim (Chung 2012) with regard to the identity of the sentence final suffix -ney are not successful. Her argument that -ney is not an epistemic modal marker loses its ground in that it DOES interact with epistemic modal adverbials, in that -ta does not belong to the same grammatical paradigm as –ney (rather, -e/-a does), and in that -ney still accompanies with conceptual distancing. Furthermore, another main claim of Chung (2014), which is that -ney should be given an assertive mood marker indicating that the proposition in question is informative to the speaker, would not be convincing until Chung provides clearer explanation of relationship between the categories of assertive mood and of her own ‘spatial deictic tense,’ the latter of which she originally claims -ney belongs to. Based on the discussion, this squib suggests that -ney can still be claimed to be an epistemic modal marker with mirativity and further shows that its conceptual distancing actually accounts for some seemingly non-canonical examples in Chung’s accounts (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies).
참고문헌 (20)
- 권익수, "한국어 종결어미 ‘-네’의 의미 재고찰: 정경숙(2012)에 대한 다른 생각", 언어, 38(1), pp.53~66 (2013), 한국언어학회
- 박재연, "한국어의 인식론적 범주와 관련한 몇 문제", 國語學, (66), pp.79~108 (2013), 국어학회
- 송재목, "안맺음씨끝 ‘-더’의 의미 기능에 대하여 : 유형론적 관점에서", 국어학, pp.135~169 (1998)
- 송재목, "한국어 증거성표지의 중복실현", 비교문화연구, 22, pp.355~375 (2011), 비교문화연구소
- 송재목, "한국어 ‘증거성’ 종결어미 ‘-네’: 정경숙(2007, 2012)에 대한 대답", 언어, 39(4), pp.819~850 (2014), 한국언어학회
- 임동훈, "한국어의 서법과 양태 체계", 한국어 의미학, 26, pp.211~248 (2008), 한국어의미학회
- 정경숙, "한국어 종결어미 '-네'의 의미: 증거성 및 의외성과 관련해서", 언어, 37(4), pp.995~1016 (2012), 한국언어학회
- 정경숙, "한국어 종결어미 ‘-네'와 단언화행", 언어, 39(3), pp.617~640 (2014), 한국언어학회
- Aikhenvald. A. Y, "Evidentiality" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Kyung-Sook Chung, "The Syntactic Structure of Deictic Tense and anaphoric Tense in Korean", 언어학, 15(4), pp.97~121 (2007), 대한언어학회
- Chung, Kyung-Sook, "Space in Tense: The Interaction of Tense, Aspect, Evidentiality and Speech Acts in Korean" (2012), John Benjamins
- DeLancey, Scott, "The Mirative and Evidentiality", Journal of Pragmatics, 33, pp.369~382 (2001)
- de Haan, Ferdinand, "The place of inference with the evidential system", International Journal of American Linguistics, 67(2), pp.193~219 (2001)
- Kwon, I, "Viewpoints in the Korean Verbal Complex: Evidence, Perception, Assessment, and Time", Ph.D., pp.2012
- Kwon, I, "The Korean Evidential Marker –Te- Revisited: Its Semantic Constraints and Distancing Effects in Mental Spaces Theory", Constructions and Frames, 4(2), pp.152~185 (2012)
- 권익수, "Licensing Multiple Sources of Information: Korean Evidentiality as a Three Term System", 언어와언어학, (55), pp.1~38 (2012), 언어연구소[DOI]
- Kwon, I, "The Viewpoint Shifter -Eha- in Korean and How it Affects Causal Event Structure", Language Sciences, 42, pp.30~42 (2014)
- Lambrecht, Knud, "Information Structure and Sentence Forms: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Searle, John R, "The Philosophy of Language", pp.182~195 (1969), Oxford University Press
- Squartini, Mario, "Lexical vs. Grammatical Evidentiality in French and Italian", Linguistics, 46(5), pp.917~947 (2008)