본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

Is contrastive implicature induced by Korean CT-marking -(n)un conventional or conversational?

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Kim, Ilkyu. 2018. Is contrastive implicature induced by Korean CT-marking -(n)un conventional or conversational Korean Journal of Linguistics, 43-2, 225-249. Although previous works have put much effort on figuring out the exact meaning of contrastive topic (CT), it has rarely been seriously investigated whether the contrastive implicature generated by CT is conventional or conversational. Particularly, the contrastive implicature induced by Korean CT-marking -(n)un is widely known to be conventional mainly due to the special prosody attached to the particle and alleged noncancellability of the implicature. The purpose of this paper is to show that the contrastive implicature induced by -(n)un, contra the standard view, is not conventional but conversational. This will be done by showing that 1) what is known as contrastive implicature of Korean CT arises only in certain contexts, and 2) the traditional criteria for distinguishing between conventional and conversational implicatures all lead to the conclusion that the contrastive implicature is conversational. (Kangwon National University)

Abstract

Kim, Ilkyu. 2018. Is contrastive implicature induced by Korean CT-marking -(n)un conventional or conversational Korean Journal of Linguistics, 43-2, 225-249. Although previous works have put much effort on figuring out the exact meaning of contrastive topic (CT), it has rarely been seriously investigated whether the contrastive implicature generated by CT is conventional or conversational. Particularly, the contrastive implicature induced by Korean CT-marking -(n)un is widely known to be conventional mainly due to the special prosody attached to the particle and alleged noncancellability of the implicature. The purpose of this paper is to show that the contrastive implicature induced by -(n)un, contra the standard view, is not conventional but conversational. This will be done by showing that 1) what is known as contrastive implicature of Korean CT arises only in certain contexts, and 2) the traditional criteria for distinguishing between conventional and conversational implicatures all lead to the conclusion that the contrastive implicature is conversational. (Kangwon National University)

참고문헌 (47)

  1. Asher, Nicholas, "Discourse topic", Theoretical Linguistics, 30, pp.163~201 (2004)
  2. Bach, Kent, "The myth of conventional implicature", Linguistics and Philosophy, 22(4), pp.327~366 (1999)
  3. Birner, Betty J, "Introduction to pragmatics" (2013), Wiley-Blackwell
  4. Blome-Tillmann, Michael, "Conversational implicature and the cancellability test", Analysis, 68(2), pp.156~160 (2008)
  5. Blutner, R, "Handbook of pragmatics", pp.488~519 (2004), Blackwell
  6. Chemla, Emmanuel, "Experimental evidence for embedded scalar implicature", Journal of Semantics, 28, pp.359~400 (2011)
  7. Chierchia, Gennaro, "Structures and Beyond: the cartography of syntactic structures, volume 3", pp.39~103 (2004), Oxford University Press
  8. Constant, Noah, "Contrastive topic: Meanings and realizations", 박사, pp.2014
  9. Gazdar, Gerald, "Pragmatics: implicature, presupposition, and logical form" (1979), Academic Press
  10. Geurts, Bart, "Scalar implicature and local pragmatics", Mind and language, 24, pp.51~79 (2009)
  11. Geurts, Bart, "Quantity implicatures" (2010), Cambridge University Press
  12. Geurts, Bart, "Presuppositions and Implicatures. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics", pp.111~112 (2008), MIT
  13. Geurts, Bart, "Embedded implicatures?!?", Semantics and Pragmatics, 2, pp.1~34 (2009)
  14. Grice, H. Paul, "Syntax and semantics: speech acts, volume 3", pp.43~58 (1975), Academic Press
  15. Hara, Yurie, "Implicature unsuspendable: Japanese contrastive wa", Proceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistics Society Conference, pp.35~45 (2006), Cascadilla Proceedings Project
  16. Hara, Yurie, "Grammar of knowledge representation: Japanese discourse items at interfaces", 박사, pp.2006
  17. Hara, Yurie, "Contrastive topics revisited: A simpler set of topic-alternatives", Talk given in The 38th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (2007), University of Ottawa
  18. Heycock, Caroline, "Focus projection in Japanese", Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 1, pp.157~171 (1994), University of Massachusetts at Amherst
  19. Hirschberg, Julia, "A theory of scalar implicature", 박사, pp.1985
  20. Horn, Laurence, "Exhaustiveness and the semantics of clefts", Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, pp.125~142 (1981), University of Massachusetts, Dept. of Linguistics
  21. Horn, Laurence, "Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications", pp.11~42 (1984), Georgetown University Press
  22. Horn, Laurence, "Given as new: when redundant affirmation isn’t", Journal of Pragmatics, 15, pp.313~336 (1991)
  23. Horn, Laurence, "Where semantics meets pragmatics: the Michigan State University papers", pp.21~48 (2006), Elsevier
  24. 전영철, "한국어의 대조초점", 언어학, (43), pp.215~237 (2005), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  25. 전영철, "대조 화제와 대조 초점의 표지 ‘는’", 한글, (274), pp.171~200 (2006), 한글학회
  26. 김지은, "The Prosody of the Alleged Korean Topic Marker -nun", 어학연구, 47(1), pp.71~99 (2011), 언어교육원
  27. 김일규, "Root Phenomena and the Nature of Korean -(n)un", 담화와 인지, 20(3), pp.27~48 (2013), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
  28. 김일규, "Is contrastive -(n)un prosodically different from non-contrastive -(n)un?", 언어연구, 30(3), pp.539~566 (2013), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  29. Krifka, Manfred, "For a structured meaning account of questions and answers", Audiatur Vox Sapientia. A festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, 52, pp.287~319 (2001)
  30. Lee, Chungmin, "Topic, contrastive topic and focus : what's on our minds", Journal of Cognitive Science, 1(2), pp.21~38 (2000)
  31. Lee, Chungmin, "Asymmetry in Grammar, volume 1: syntax and semantics", pp.345~371 (2002), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  32. Korean linguistics 12, "Japanese", pp.2003, Lee, Chungmin
  33. Lee, Chungmin, "Concessivity, conditionality, scalar implicatures, and polarity – with reference to contrastive topic", focus, J-K Linguistics, pp.2005[DOI]
  34. Lee, Chungmin, "Where semantics meets pragmatics", pp.381~420 (2006), Elsevier
  35. Lee, Chungmin, "Topic and focus: Cross-linguistic perspectives on meaning and intonation", pp.151~175 (2007), Springer
  36. Lee, Yae-Sheik, "Scales and alternatives: disjunction, exhaustivity, and emphatic particles", Ph.D, pp.1995
  37. Levinson, Stephen, "Presumptive meanings: the theory of generalized conversational implicature" (2000), The MIT Press
  38. Oh, Mira, "Prosody and Information Structure : Phonetic Realizations of Focus and Topic in Korean(written in Korean)", Umsengkwahak, 15(2), pp.7~19 (2008)
  39. Onea, Edgar, "Hungarian focus is not exhausted", Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), 19, pp.342~359 (2011)
  40. Russell, Benjamin, "Against grammatical computation of scalar implicatures", Journal of Semantics, 23, pp.361~382 (2006)
  41. Russell, Benjamin, "Probabilistic reasoning and the computation of scalar implicatures", Ph.D, pp.2012
  42. Sadock, Jerrold M, "Syntax and Semantics, Vo. 3: Speech acts", pp.281~297 (1978), Academic Press
  43. Sauerland, Uli, "The computation of scalar implicatures: pragmatic, lexical, or grammatical?", Language and Linguistics Compass, 6, pp.36~49 (2012)
  44. Shibatani, Masayoshi, "The languages of Japan" (1990), Cambridge University Press
  45. Tomioka, Satoshi, "Information structure: theoretical, typological, and experimental perspectives", pp.115~138 (2010), Oxford University Press
  46. Tomioka, Satoshi, "A scope theory of contrastive topics", Iberia, 2(1), pp.113~130 (2010)
  47. von Stechow, Armin, "Discourse particles", pp.37~84 (1990), John Benjamins Publishing Company

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)