한국어 정보구조표지 ‘은/는’의 의미 — 대조 의미를 중심으로
A Semantics for (n)un as an Information Structure Marker: With a Focus on the Meaning of Contrast
0
조회
0
다운로드
18
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines Korean (n)un as a marker for information structure, and identifies its three functions such as topic, topical contrast, and focal contrast markers. In particular, it argues that (n)un marks focal contrast as well as topical contrast. Four pieces of evidence are provided for the distinction between topical contrast marker (n)un and focal contrast marker (n)un: substitutability of a case marker for contrast marker (n)un, pragmatic implicature vs. semantic entailment, categorical differences of the constituents accompanied by topical/focal contrast markers, and word order. This study treats contrast as providing a partial information, which can be represented by strategy. Strategy is a hierarchical discourse structure in which QUD (question under discussion) is divided into sub-questions, and only one of them is answered. Furthermore, the separation of focal contrast marker (n)un from topical contrast marker (n)un is supported by the fact that the strategy for topical contrast marker (n)un is formed from conjunction of sub-questions whereas that for focal contrast marker (n)un from inclusive disjunction of them.
Abstract
This study examines Korean (n)un as a marker for information structure, and identifies its three functions such as topic, topical contrast, and focal contrast markers. In particular, it argues that (n)un marks focal contrast as well as topical contrast. Four pieces of evidence are provided for the distinction between topical contrast marker (n)un and focal contrast marker (n)un: substitutability of a case marker for contrast marker (n)un, pragmatic implicature vs. semantic entailment, categorical differences of the constituents accompanied by topical/focal contrast markers, and word order. This study treats contrast as providing a partial information, which can be represented by strategy. Strategy is a hierarchical discourse structure in which QUD (question under discussion) is divided into sub-questions, and only one of them is answered. Furthermore, the separation of focal contrast marker (n)un from topical contrast marker (n)un is supported by the fact that the strategy for topical contrast marker (n)un is formed from conjunction of sub-questions whereas that for focal contrast marker (n)un from inclusive disjunction of them.
참고문헌 (38)
- 김태인, "‘-은", 는’이 결합하는 일부 한국어 부사어의 정보 구조에 대하여, 2019, pp.80(3), 465~500[DOI]
- 김일규, "Can Korean -(n)un Mark (Contrastive) Focus?", Language Sciences, 56, pp.105~117 (2016)
- 박철우, "한국어 정보구조에서의 화제와 초점", 박사, 언어학, pp.1998
- 박철우, "‘대조’ 의미의 언어학적 성격 —정보구조와 관련하여", 한국어 의미학, 45, pp.129~157 (2014), 한국어의미학회
- 박철우, "보조사의 기능과 정보구조", 國語學, (73), pp.269~307 (2015), 국어학회[DOI]
- 서정목, "국어 의문문 연구" (1987), 탑출판사
- 이남순, "국어의 부정격과 격표지 생략" (1988), 탑출판사
- 이정민, "Contrastive Topic and", or Contrastive Focus, 2003, pp.12, 352~364
- 임동훈, "‘은", 는’과 종횡의 의미 관계, 2012, pp.(64), 217~271[DOI]
- 임동훈, "보조사의 의미론", 國語學, (73), pp.335~373 (2015), 국어학회[DOI]
- 전영철, "한국어의 대조초점", 언어학, (43), pp.215~237 (2005), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 전영철, "대조 화제와 대조 초점의 표지 ‘는’", 한글, (274), pp.171~200 (2006), 한글학회
- 전영철, "한국어 명사구의 의미론" (2013), 서울대학교출판문화원
- 최윤지, "한국어 정보구조 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.2016
- 한정혜, "Asymmetry in the Interpretation of -(n)un in Korean", Japanese Korean Linguistics, 7, pp.1~15 (1998)
- Bolinger, D., "Contrastive Accent and Contrastive Stress", Language, 37, pp.83~96 (1961)
- Büring, D., "The Meaning of Topic and Focus-The 59th Street Bridge Accent" (1997), Routledge
- Büring, D., "On D-Tree, Beans, and B-Accents", Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, pp.511~545 (2003)
- Büring, D., "The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure", pp.64~85 (2016), Oxford University Press
- É. Kiss, Katalin, "Identificational Focus versus Information Focus", Language, 74, pp.245~273 (1998)
- É. Kiss, Katalin, "Information Structure: Theoretical, Typological and Experimental Perspectives", pp.64~88 (2010), Oxford University Press
- Gundel, J. K., "The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory", Ph.D., pp.1974
- Gundel, J. K., "The Handbook of Pragmatics", pp.175~196 (2004), Blackwell
- Hetland, Jorunn, "Structures of Focus and Grammatical Relations", pp.1~39 (2003), Max Niemeyer Verlag
- Jacobs, Joachim, "The Dimensions of Topic-Comment", Linguistics, 39(4), pp.641~681 (2001)
- Kiefer, Ferenc, "Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics", pp.97~119 (1980)
- Krifka, Manfred, "Quantifying into Question Acts", Natural Language Semantics, 9, pp.1~40 (2001)
- Lambrecht, K., "Information Structure and Sentence Form" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- McNally, L., "The Tbilisi Symposium on Language, Logic and Computation: Selected Papers", pp.147~160 (1998), CSLI Publications
- Molnár, Valéria, "Contrast from a Contrastive Perspective", Proceedings of ESSLLI 2001, pp.99~114 (2001)
- Molnár, Valéria, "The Architecture of Focus", pp.197~233 (2006), Mouton de Gruyter
- Mulkern, A., "The Grammar-Pragmatics Interface: Essays in Honor of Jeanette K. Gundel", pp.113~142 (2007), John Benjamins
- Reinhart, T., "Pragmatics and Linguistics: An Analysis of Sentence Topics", Philosophica, 27, pp.53~94 (1981)
- Repp, S., "Defining ‘Contrast’ as an Information-structural Notion in Grammar", Lingua, 120, pp.1333~1345 (2010)
- Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics, "Roberts, Craige", OSU, 91~136, pp.Working Papers in Linguistics 29 (1996)
- Roberts, Craige, "Semantics: An Introduction Handbook of Natural Language Meaning vol. 2", pp.1908~1934 (2011), Mouton De Gruyter
- Szabolci, Anna, "Formal Methods In the Study of Language", pp.513~541 (1981), Matematish Centrum
- Vallduvi, E., "The Limit of Syntax, Syntax and Semantics 29", pp.79~108 (1998)