Nominal Remnants from Object-verb Idioms in Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Lee, Soo-Hwan & Lee, Doo-Won. 2018. Nominal Remnants from Object-verb Idioms in Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 43-2, 297-329. The fronting of a constituent within an idiom without recourse to any of the linguistic contexts eradicates its idiomatic interpretation. With contexts taken into consideration, however, interesting observations are made. When a relevant antecedent context is presented, an idiomatic (i.e., idiom-oriented) object within some verbal idioms consisting of an object and a verb may undergo movement to the sentence-initial position, preserving the idiomatic interpretation, regardless of whether it is caseless or case-marked. The presence or absence of the corresponding idiomatic correlate in the antecedent plays a crucial role in extracting an object out of its verbal idiom. From such view, the present work raises an objection to the in-situ approach to idiomatic fragments or idiomatic appendices in repetitive right dislocation constructions (RDCs), advocating the standard analysis for fragmentation along with Merchant’s (2004) approach that the relevant remnants are derived via the move-and-delete process. The idiomatic appendix in repetitive RDCs may preserve its figurative reading, since its overt idiomatic correlate appears in the antecedent clause. The idiomatic appendix in a repetitive RDC must undergo focus movement while the rest of the clause can be elided under identity, which works out perfectly within the bi-clausal fragment approach. Neither of the pseudo-cleft analysis nor the copula structure analysis (i.e., limited ellipsis) can introduce an idiomatic interpretation for the caseless idiomatic fragments. The caseless idiomatic fragment can be used with the non-copula regular tag, while it is incompatible with the copula tag, regardless of whether it is context free or context dependent. (Sogang University & Korea National University of Transportation)
Abstract
Lee, Soo-Hwan & Lee, Doo-Won. 2018. Nominal Remnants from Object-verb Idioms in Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 43-2, 297-329. The fronting of a constituent within an idiom without recourse to any of the linguistic contexts eradicates its idiomatic interpretation. With contexts taken into consideration, however, interesting observations are made. When a relevant antecedent context is presented, an idiomatic (i.e., idiom-oriented) object within some verbal idioms consisting of an object and a verb may undergo movement to the sentence-initial position, preserving the idiomatic interpretation, regardless of whether it is caseless or case-marked. The presence or absence of the corresponding idiomatic correlate in the antecedent plays a crucial role in extracting an object out of its verbal idiom. From such view, the present work raises an objection to the in-situ approach to idiomatic fragments or idiomatic appendices in repetitive right dislocation constructions (RDCs), advocating the standard analysis for fragmentation along with Merchant’s (2004) approach that the relevant remnants are derived via the move-and-delete process. The idiomatic appendix in repetitive RDCs may preserve its figurative reading, since its overt idiomatic correlate appears in the antecedent clause. The idiomatic appendix in a repetitive RDC must undergo focus movement while the rest of the clause can be elided under identity, which works out perfectly within the bi-clausal fragment approach. Neither of the pseudo-cleft analysis nor the copula structure analysis (i.e., limited ellipsis) can introduce an idiomatic interpretation for the caseless idiomatic fragments. The caseless idiomatic fragment can be used with the non-copula regular tag, while it is incompatible with the copula tag, regardless of whether it is context free or context dependent. (Sogang University & Korea National University of Transportation)
참고문헌 (56)
- 안희돈, "On Scope Asymmetries in Fragments", 생성문법연구, 15(4), pp.661~678 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
- 안희돈, "On Form-Function Mismatch Puzzles in Fragments: An Ellipsis Approach", 담화와 인지, 13(1), pp.91~110 (2006), 담화·인지언어학회
- 안희돈, "Right Dislocation vs. Fragment: A Reply to Ko (2014)", 생성문법연구, 25(2), pp.427~446 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 안희돈, "A Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments", 생성문법연구, 27(1), pp.197~220 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 안희돈, "On Caseless Fragments and Some Implications", 어학연구, 53(2), pp.247~286 (2017), 언어교육원
- 안희돈, "A hybrid ellipsis analysis of two types of fragments in Korean", 언어연구, 34(3), pp.311~359 (2017), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 안희돈, "Notes on Fragments with Tag Questions in English and Korean", 생성문법연구, 28(1), pp.213~231 (2018), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Berman, Arlene, "A constraint on tough-movement", the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.34~43 (1973), University of Chicago
- Bresnan, Joan, "On the form and functioning of transformations", Linguistic Inquiry, 7, pp.3~40 (1976)
- Bruening, Benjamin, "The structure of nominal phrases with and without classifiers: Evidence from selection and idioms", Glossa, 3, pp.1~46 (2018)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Current issues in linguistic theory" (1964), Mouton
- Chomsky, Noam, "Aspects of the theory of syntax" (1965), MIT press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures" (1981), Mouton de Gruyter
- Chomsky, Noam, "The View from Building 20", pp.1~52 (1993), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chung, Sandra, "Syntactic identity in sluicing: How much and why", Linguistic Inquiry, 44, pp.1~44 (2013)
- Craenenbroeck, Jeroen Van, "Ellipsis, identity, and accommodation", pp.2012
- Craenenbroeck, Jeroen Van, "The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax", pp.701~745 (2013), Cambridge University Press
- Ḗ. Kiss, K, "Identificational focus versus information focus", Language, 74(2), pp.245~273 (1998)
- Fox, Danny, "Economy and semantic interpretation", Ph.D, pp.1998
- Fukaya, Teruhiko, "Sluicing and stripping in Japanese and some implications", Ph.D, pp.2007
- Hankamer, Jorge, "Deep and surface anaphora", Linguistic Inquiry, 7(3), pp.391~428 (1976)
- 김랑혜윤, "관용표현이 조각문에 관해 말해주는 것", 언어학 연구, (37), pp.55~67 (2015), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
- 김랑혜윤, "Some Arguments for the In-Situ Remnants", 생성문법연구, 27(3), pp.535~564 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김선웅, "On the Reparability of Preposition Stranding", 언어연구, 27(1), pp.137~164 (2010), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 고희정, "Two Ways to the Right: A Hybrid approach to Right-dislocation in Korean", 어학연구, 51(1), pp.3~40 (2015), 언어교육원
- 고희정, "Gapless Right-Dislocation: The Role of Overt Correlates", 어학연구, 52(1), pp.3~32 (2016), 언어교육원
- Lasnik, Howard, "When can you save a structure by destroying it?", Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society, 31(2), pp.301~320 (2001)
- 이두원, "관용적 요소가 조각문, 강조, 대조초점, 이동에 관해 말해 주는 것", 언어학 연구, (40), pp.239~256 (2016), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
- Lee, Jeong-Shik, "VPE and its kin: Indirect identity and focus", the workshop of The Korean Generative Grammar Circle (2018), Dongkuk University
- 이정식, "국어 조각구에 관한 분석", 언어학 연구, (39), pp.231~250 (2016), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
- Lee, Moon-Yel, "Change (in Korean)" (1989), Minumsa
- 이수환, "Inalienable possession construction and passive markers inducing an idiomatic interpretation", 언어연구, 34(3), pp.239~272 (2017), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 이수환, "Repetitive Right Dislocation Constructions and Repetitive Fragments: With Reference to Verbal Idioms in Korean", 인문논총, 45, pp.101~120 (2018), 인문과학연구소[DOI]
- 이수환, "Idiomatic Appendices in Gapped Right Dislocation Constructions", 현대문법연구, (97), pp.1~19 (2018), 현대문법학회[DOI]
- Marantz, Alec, ""Cat" as a phrasal idiom", pp.1996
- Merchant, Jason, "The Syntax of silence: Sluicing islands, and the theory of ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Merchant, Jason, "Fragments and ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, pp.661~738 (2004)
- Merchant, Jason, "An asymmetry in voice mismatches in VP-ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 39, pp.169~179 (2008)
- Morgan, Jerry, "Sentence fragments revisited", CLS, 25, pp.228~241 (1989)
- Nunberg, Geoffrey, "Idioms", Language, 70, pp.491~538 (1994)
- Park, Bum-Sik, "Locality and identity in ellipsis", Ph.D, pp.2005
- Park, Bum-Sik, "Island-insensitive fragment answers in Korean", Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp.317~325 (2005), Simon Fraser University
- 박범식, "Multiple fragment answers in Korean", 언어연구, 30(3), pp.453~472 (2013), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 박범식, "Ways of Deriving Bare Fragments: Case-stranding and Postposition-stranding under Ellipsis", 생성문법연구, 25(4), pp.825~849 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 박범식, "Case-drop, left-branch extraction and multiplicity in the right-dislocation construction", 언어연구, 33(2), pp.259~297 (2016), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 박범식, "On the Island-(In)Sensitivity in the Right-Dislocation Construction in Korean", 언어과학연구, (83), pp.135~153 (2017), 언어과학회[DOI]
- 박명관, "Pre", postposition Stranding under Sluicing and the Identity Condition on Ellipsis, 2014, pp.(78), 1~19[DOI]
- Rottman, Isaac, "Sluicing, idioms, and island repair", Linguistic Inquiry, 44, pp.651~668 (2013)
- Sauerland, Uli, "The meaning of chains", Ph.D, pp.1998
- Sells, Peter, "Japanese postposing involves no movement", the meeting of the Linguistic Association of Great Britain (1999), University of Manchester
- Stones, Megan Schildmier, "The difference between bucket-kicking and kicking the bucket: Understanding idiom flexibility", Ph.D, pp.2016
- 위혜경, "Three Types of Fragment", 생성문법연구, 24(1), pp.255~280 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Weir, Andrew, "Fragments and clausal ellipsis", Ph.D, pp.2014
- 윤정회, "Bare Fragment Answers as Elliptical Pseudoclefts", 생성문법연구, 24(2), pp.365~384 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Yoshida, Masaya, "“Antecedent-contained” sluicing", Linguistic Inquiry, 41, pp.348~356 (2010)