본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

보어 유형과 (비-)사실성: 사실성 전제, 한정성, 섬제약을 중심으로

Complement Types and (Non-)factivity: Based on Factive presupposition, Definiteness, and Islands

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper analyzes the syntactic and semantic nature of the complements in (non-)factive environments. In certain embedding contexts, the presence versus absence of the factive presupposition is solely attributed to a complement choice in Korean. To explain this by exploiting clues provided by several discourse properties, it is argued that kes-ul and kes-ulo complements compete with each other in terms of Maximize Presupposition!. Several new data based on factive islands are presented to show that the definitive presupposition plays a major role in this competition. Given this, it turns out that a kes-ulo complement type amounts to a unmarked variant; thus, it should convey discourse new information. Focusing on the discourse properties of some functional categories, it is also discussed that kes-ulo complements are only compatible with a truncated structure. In contrast, as a marked variant, a kes-ul complement type is claimed to be able to have both truncated and non-truncated structures. In this way, this paper puts forth an idea to explain why a truncated form of the marked variant should be used to convey the factive presupposition. Taken together, it is also clarified why a ko complement type is free from such competition.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the syntactic and semantic nature of the complements in (non-)factive environments. In certain embedding contexts, the presence versus absence of the factive presupposition is solely attributed to a complement choice in Korean. To explain this by exploiting clues provided by several discourse properties, it is argued that kes-ul and kes-ulo complements compete with each other in terms of Maximize Presupposition!. Several new data based on factive islands are presented to show that the definitive presupposition plays a major role in this competition. Given this, it turns out that a kes-ulo complement type amounts to a unmarked variant; thus, it should convey discourse new information. Focusing on the discourse properties of some functional categories, it is also discussed that kes-ulo complements are only compatible with a truncated structure. In contrast, as a marked variant, a kes-ul complement type is claimed to be able to have both truncated and non-truncated structures. In this way, this paper puts forth an idea to explain why a truncated form of the marked variant should be used to convey the factive presupposition. Taken together, it is also clarified why a ko complement type is free from such competition.

참고문헌 (57)

  1. Abrusán, Márta, "Presuppositional and negative islands : A semantic account", Natural Language Semantics, 19(3), pp.257~321 (2011)
  2. Abrusán, Márta, "Weak Island Semantics" (2014), Oxford University Press
  3. Abusch, Dorit, "Presupposition Triggering from Alternatives", Journal of Semantics, 27, pp.37~80 (2010)
  4. Anand, Pranav, "The Art and Craft of Semantics: A Festschrift for Irene Heim", pp.69~90 (2014), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics
  5. Bogal-Allbritten, Elizabeth, "Nominalized clauses and reference to propositional content", Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung (SuB), 21, pp.215~232 (2017)
  6. Bondarenko, Tatiana, "Factivity from pre-existence: Evidence from Barguzin Buryat", Glossa : a journal of general linguistics, 5(1), pp.1~35 (2020)
  7. Bondarenko, Tatiana, "The dual life of embedded CPs : Evidence from Russian ˇc to-clauses", Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory(SALT), 31, pp.304~323 (2021)
  8. Caplan, Spencer, "What usage can tell us about grammar : Embedded verb second in Scandinavian", Glossa : a journal of general linguistics, 4(1)통권 : 101, pp.1~37 (2019)
  9. Choe, Jae W., "LF-movement and pied-piping", Linguistic Inquiry, 18(2), pp.348~353 (1987)
  10. Chomsky, Noam, "A Festschrift for Morris Halle", pp.232~286 (1973), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  11. de Cuba, Carlos, "On (non)factivity, clausal complementation and the CP-Field", Phd, pp.2007
  12. de Cuba, Carlos, "Noun complement clauses as referential modifiers", Glossa:a journal of general linguistics, 2(1), pp.1~46 (2017)
  13. Djärv, Kajsa, "The syntax of assertion and presupposition", Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), 29, pp.392~419 (2019)
  14. Djärv, Kajsa, "Factivity, assertion, and clausal definiteness", Proceedings of the 38th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics(WCCFL), pp.169~179 (2021)
  15. Farkas, F. Donka, "On reacting to assertions and polar questions", Journal of Semantics, 27, pp.81~118 (2010)
  16. Haegeman, Liliane, "Referential CPs and DPs : An operator movement account", Theoretical Linguistics, 36, pp.111~152 (2010)
  17. 한정한, "전제 개념과 ‘-음’ 내포절", Journal of korean Culture, 44, pp.7~36 (2019), 한국언어문화학술확산연구소[DOI]
  18. Heim, Irene, ""On the projection problem for presuppositions", Proceedings of the 2nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics(WCCFL), pp.114~125 (1983)
  19. Heim, Irene, "Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung", pp.487~535 (1991), De Gruyter
  20. Heim, Irene, "Phi Theory", pp.35~56 (2008), Oxford University Press
  21. Ippolito, Michela, "Subjunctive Conditionals" (2013), MIT Press
  22. Hoe, Semoon, "On the 1st", 2nd person restriction of Korean anaphor caki and its implications, 2015, pp.49, 153~168
  23. 허세문, "접미사 ‘들’의 복수성에 대한 연구 — ‘자기’의 국부적 결속 관계를 중심으로", 언어학, (85), pp.199~226 (2019), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
  24. 허세문, "사실성 전제와 보문의 특성에 대한 새로운 관점", 國語學, (101), pp.95~150 (2022), 국어학회[DOI]
  25. Honcoop, Martin, "Dynamic excursions on weak islands", Doctor, pp.1998
  26. 강범모, "한국어 보문명사 구문의 의미특성", 어학연구, 19(1), pp.53~73 (1983)
  27. Kastner, Itamar, "Factivity mirrors interpretation : The selectional requirements of presuppositional verbs", Lingua, 164, pp.156~188 (2015)
  28. 김천학, "보절의 사실성에 대한 고찰", 한국어학, 86, pp.179~204 (2020), 한국어학회
  29. Kim, Min-Joo, "E-type anaphora and three types of kes-construction in Korean", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 27(2), pp.345~377 (2009)
  30. Kiparsky, Paul, "Progress in Linguistics", pp.143~173 (1970), The Hague
  31. Ko, Heejeong, "Edges in Syntax: Scrambling and Cyclic Linearization" (2014), Oxford University Press
  32. Kratzer, Angelika, "Decomposing Attitude Verbs", Handout from the Workshop in Honor of Anita Mittwoch (2006), The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  33. 권재일, "현대국어의 {기}-명사화 내포문 연구", 한글, 171, pp.45~63 (1981)
  34. Lee, Chungmin, "Languages with non-factive knowledge verbs of ‘know’", Proceedings of Logic and Engineering of Natural Language Semantics (LENLS), 14 (2017), JSAI
  35. Lee, Chungmin, "Factive presupposition by nominal complement clause by unselection", Proceedings of Logic and Engineering of Natural Language Semantics (LENLS), 16 (2019), JSAI
  36. 이정민, "태도 동사 ‘알다’의 사실성 교체-한국어와 그 밖의 알타이 제어의 특성", 國語學, (96), pp.3~58 (2020), 국어학회[DOI]
  37. Moulton, Keir, "CPs : Copies and compositionality", Linguistic Inquiry, 46(2), pp.305~342 (2015)
  38. 문숙영, "유형론의 관점에서 본 한국어의 ‘것’ 명사절", 國語學, (84), pp.33~88 (2017), 국어학회[DOI]
  39. 남기심, "국어문법의 탐구 1", pp.133~254 (1996), 태학사
  40. Oshima, David Y., "New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence", pp.147~161 (2007), Springer
  41. Özyildiz, Deniz, "Attitude reports with and without true belief", Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), 27, pp.397~417 (2017)
  42. Park, Dongwoo, "Korean specificational pseudoclefts as caseless focus nominal extraction", Studia Linguistica, 75(3), pp.538~574 (2021)
  43. 박상희, "Korean Internally-Headed Relatives and Their Potentially Homophonous Constructions", 언어, 45(1), pp.119~144 (2020), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  44. “Anti-presupposition,” in Theoretical and empirical studies of reference and anaphora, "Percus, Orin", Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, 52~73, pp.Report of the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), Report No. 15320052 (2006)
  45. Pesetsky, David, "The representation of (in)definiteness", pp.98~130 (1987), MIT Press
  46. Sauerland, Uli, "Sentence and Context: Language, context, and cognition", pp.581~600 (2008), de Gruyter
  47. Sauerland, Uli, "Phi Theory", pp.57~82 (2008), Oxford University Press
  48. Schlenker, Philippe, "Romance languages and linguistic theory 2003", pp.269~309 (2005), Benjamins
  49. Schwarz, Bernhard, "Factive islands and meaning-driven unacceptability", Natural Language Semantics, 26, pp.253~279 (2018)
  50. Schwarz Bernhard, "Factive island from necessary blocking", Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), 29, pp.529~548 (2019)
  51. Schwarzschild, Roger, "GIVENness, AvoidF and other constraints on the placement of accent", aNatural Language Semantics, 7, pp.141~177 (1999)
  52. Shim, Ji Young, "Facts: The interplay between the matrix predicate and its clausal complement", The Second Asian and European Linguistic Conference, Newcastle and Northumbria Working Papers in Linguistics (2015)
  53. Simons, Mandy, "On the conversational basis of some presuppositions", Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), 11, pp.431~448 (2001)
  54. Simons, Mandy, "What projects and why", Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), 20, pp.309~327 (2010)
  55. Singh, Raj, "Maximize Presupposition! and local contexts", Natural Language Semantics, 19, pp.149~168 (2011)
  56. Stalnaker, Robert, "Semantics and Philosophy", pp.197~213 (1974), New York University Press
  57. Stalnaker, Robert, "Syntax and Semantics, vol. 9", pp.315~322 (1978), Academic Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)