본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

한국어 자동사 구문의대격 할당 현상에 관하여

On accusative Case assignment in Korean intransitive constructions

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper concernsa peculiar phenomenon in natural language, which is that of accusative Caseassignment in intransitive constructions, so widely occurring in Korean. In fact,this phenomenon has so far been a troublesome problem in the studies of Koreanlanguage, since it gives rise to serious complexities with regard to the conceptsof subject/object, transitive/intransitive, accusative/non-accusative, etc. So, thispaper argues for a solid solution to the classification of verbs based on theirθ-grids, detecting that there exist two types of intransitive verbs: S-intransitiveand O-intransitive in Korean, and that the one assigning accusative Case is nomore than S-intransitive, rather than O-intransitive. Consequently, it goes tolight that this phenomenon is not peculiar nor troublesome any longer, but ratherfalls under UG in that it conforms to the universal principle that the accusativeCase is assigned, by labeling algorithm(LA), to XPs in the VP-criterial positionin v*P phase, within the framework of Chomsky’s(2013, 2015) labeling theory.

Abstract

This paper concernsa peculiar phenomenon in natural language, which is that of accusative Caseassignment in intransitive constructions, so widely occurring in Korean. In fact,this phenomenon has so far been a troublesome problem in the studies of Koreanlanguage, since it gives rise to serious complexities with regard to the conceptsof subject/object, transitive/intransitive, accusative/non-accusative, etc. So, thispaper argues for a solid solution to the classification of verbs based on theirθ-grids, detecting that there exist two types of intransitive verbs: S-intransitiveand O-intransitive in Korean, and that the one assigning accusative Case is nomore than S-intransitive, rather than O-intransitive. Consequently, it goes tolight that this phenomenon is not peculiar nor troublesome any longer, but ratherfalls under UG in that it conforms to the universal principle that the accusativeCase is assigned, by labeling algorithm(LA), to XPs in the VP-criterial positionin v*P phase, within the framework of Chomsky’s(2013, 2015) labeling theory.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. Baker, M, "Incorporation : A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing" (1988), University of Chicago Press
  2. Burzio, L, "Italian Syntax", Reidel, ~ (1986)
  3. Choi, Hyun-Bae, "Korean Grammar" (1980), Jungum Press
  4. Chomsky, N, "Aspects of the Theory of Syntax" (1965), MIT Press
  5. Chomsky, N, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
  6. Chomsky, N, "Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language: A Concise Anthology" (1986), Praeger
  7. Chomsky, N, "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
  8. Chomsky, N, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
  9. Chomsky, N, "Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
  10. Chomsky, N, "Structures and Beyond-The Cartography of Syntactic Structure Vol 3", pp.104~131 (2004), Oxford University Press
  11. Chomsky, N, "Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud", pp.291~321 (2008), MIT Press
  12. Chomsky, N, "Problems of Projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
  13. Chomsky, N, "Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in Honour Adriana Belletti", pp.1~16 (2015), Benjamin
  14. Chomsky, N., "Genuine Explanation", Presented at WCCFL39 (2021)
  15. Chomsky, N, "Minimalism : Where are we now, and where can we hope to go", Gengo Kenkyu, 160, pp.1~41 (2021)
  16. Chomsky, N, "The Miracle Creed and SMT", ms, pp.2023
  17. Chomsky, N, "Working toward the Strong Interpretation of SMT", Talk at 2023Theoretical Linguistics at Keio-EMU Linguistics as Scientific Inquiry Lecture Series #3, ~ (2023)
  18. Fukui, N, "A Theory of Category Projection and Its Application", Ph D, pp.1986
  19. Grimshaw, J, "Argument Structure" (1990), MIT Press
  20. Gruber, J. S, "Lexical Structures of Syntax and Semantics" (1976)
  21. Haegeman, L, "Introduction to Government and Binding Theory" (1994), Blackwell
  22. Hale, K, "Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages", NLLT, 1, pp.5~47 (1983)
  23. Im, Hong-Bin, "On Negative {e} and Stative {ko}", Collected Papers, 8, pp.13~36 (1975), Kookmin University
  24. Im, Hong-Bin, "On the Meaning and Function of Supplement {ul", lul}, 1979, pp.2, ~[DOI]
  25. Jackendoff, R, "Some Rules of Semantic Interpretation for English", Ph D, pp.1969
  26. Jespersen, Otto, "Essentials of English Grammar" (1933), George Allen & Unwin LTD
  27. Keyser S. J., "The View from Building 20" (1993), MIT Press
  28. Kim, Moon-Oh, "Studies on Two-face Verbs of Transitive and Intransitive in Korean", Ph.D., pp.1997
  29. 김용석, "이른바"명사절"에 관하여", 언어, 47(4), pp.753~776 (2022)
  30. Lasnik, H, "Clause-mate conditions revisited", Glot Internationl, 6(4), pp.94~96 (2002)
  31. Lasnik, H., "On the subject of infinitives", Papers from the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Part I: The General Session, pp.324~343 (1991)
  32. Levin, J., "Surface Ergativity : Case", theta relations reexamined, 1984, pp.15, 286~301
  33. Moro, A, "Dynamic Antisymmetry" (2000), MIT Press
  34. Ouhalla, Jamal, "Introducing Transformational Grammar from principles and parameters to Minimalism" (1994), Oxford University Press
  35. Postal, P. M, "On Raising : One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications" (1974), MIT Press
  36. Saito. M, "Some Asymmetries in Japanese Their Theoretical Implications", Ph D., pp.1985
  37. Seo, Jung-Soo, "Korean Grammar" (1996), Hanyang University Press
  38. 송창선, "국어 자동사와 타동사의 구분 문제", 언어과학연구, 47, pp.35~55 (2008), 언어과학회
  39. 송창선, "피동문에 나타나는 을", 를의 문법적 기능, 2009, pp.284, 107~131
  40. Speas, M, "Adjunction and Projection in Syntax", Ph D., pp.1986
  41. Sung, Kwang-Soo, "Korean Objects", pp.78~101 (2001), Wuelin Press
  42. Whitman, J, "Configurationality parameters", 351~374 (1986)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)