본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국의 초현실주의와 문화번역 - 조향의 시를 중심으로

Surrealism in Korea and Cultural Translation - focused on the poems of Hyang Cho

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This paper examines the poetic works of Hyang Cho who enthusiastically introduced the western cultural theory of Surrealism developed mainly in France, and exerted himself to build a new version of the theory under the unique cultural terrains of the 1950's Korea. It adopts a ‘cultural translation’ approach in order to take contextual differences between western and Korean cultures into account. In other words, the article analyzes the poet Hyang Cho as an agent of cultural translation, bridging the gaps between two divergent cultures and examines the way in which his own Korean surrealist poetry came into existence. His poems reflect his pioneering efforts to depart from the war-stricken nation in the early 1950s and move ahead to see the awakening of a new cultural era in the latter part of the decade. Such aspiration is occasionally revealed in his poems when contrasting the past as “an old worn genre painting” with “a charming print of the second half of the century” of the present and future. He juxtaposed and blended foreign words, loaned words, Chinese and Korean characters in his writings; fabricated poetic texts of his predecessors home and abroad using collage technique for the purpose of the honest exposition of the chaotic modern civilization where nature/culture, sacred/secular, domestic/foreign elements, and consciousness/subconsciousness are all interwoven. He also replicated surrealistic experiments in terms of the configuration of texts in the shape of reverse triangles or a descending flight of stairs, demonstrating insecure spaces about to fall apart or the downfall of civilization. This kind of figure poems demonstrates his fuller recognition of reality and sharper awareness of cultural crisis than anyone else in his time. Despite excessive subjective artificiality found in his verses and the heaps of good and bad criticism layed on his achievements, no one can deny his accomplishment in establishing the basis of rational interpretations of surrealism and identifying its exact locus from a Korean point of view. He advocated a so-called Neo-surrealism, connected dissonant images of Surrealism with the darkness of the modern civilization and ultimately sought to raise the Korean surrealism up to the level of global standards. Although his Neo-surrealism merely revealed his pessimistic viewpoint toward the world, his attempt to overlap the unconscious world with the dark side of reality, and therefore try to understand reality from the outside and analyze and evaluate it systematically, is in itself a very creative endeavor. From the perspective of ‘cultural translation’ which lay emphasis on diversity, his poems and poetics give us a chance to appreciate the significance of Surrealistic poems. His interests were not to interpret languages but to interpret cultures, which enabled him to genuinely expose hybrid aspects of culture. Implementing acoustic and linguistic experiments of surrealists coupled with rhythms in traditional Korean poetry, Hyang Cho established a ‘Korean Surrealism’, contributing to the rich flourishment of Korean literature.

Abstract

This paper examines the poetic works of Hyang Cho who enthusiastically introduced the western cultural theory of Surrealism developed mainly in France, and exerted himself to build a new version of the theory under the unique cultural terrains of the 1950's Korea. It adopts a ‘cultural translation’ approach in order to take contextual differences between western and Korean cultures into account. In other words, the article analyzes the poet Hyang Cho as an agent of cultural translation, bridging the gaps between two divergent cultures and examines the way in which his own Korean surrealist poetry came into existence. His poems reflect his pioneering efforts to depart from the war-stricken nation in the early 1950s and move ahead to see the awakening of a new cultural era in the latter part of the decade. Such aspiration is occasionally revealed in his poems when contrasting the past as “an old worn genre painting” with “a charming print of the second half of the century” of the present and future. He juxtaposed and blended foreign words, loaned words, Chinese and Korean characters in his writings; fabricated poetic texts of his predecessors home and abroad using collage technique for the purpose of the honest exposition of the chaotic modern civilization where nature/culture, sacred/secular, domestic/foreign elements, and consciousness/subconsciousness are all interwoven. He also replicated surrealistic experiments in terms of the configuration of texts in the shape of reverse triangles or a descending flight of stairs, demonstrating insecure spaces about to fall apart or the downfall of civilization. This kind of figure poems demonstrates his fuller recognition of reality and sharper awareness of cultural crisis than anyone else in his time. Despite excessive subjective artificiality found in his verses and the heaps of good and bad criticism layed on his achievements, no one can deny his accomplishment in establishing the basis of rational interpretations of surrealism and identifying its exact locus from a Korean point of view. He advocated a so-called Neo-surrealism, connected dissonant images of Surrealism with the darkness of the modern civilization and ultimately sought to raise the Korean surrealism up to the level of global standards. Although his Neo-surrealism merely revealed his pessimistic viewpoint toward the world, his attempt to overlap the unconscious world with the dark side of reality, and therefore try to understand reality from the outside and analyze and evaluate it systematically, is in itself a very creative endeavor. From the perspective of ‘cultural translation’ which lay emphasis on diversity, his poems and poetics give us a chance to appreciate the significance of Surrealistic poems. His interests were not to interpret languages but to interpret cultures, which enabled him to genuinely expose hybrid aspects of culture. Implementing acoustic and linguistic experiments of surrealists coupled with rhythms in traditional Korean poetry, Hyang Cho established a ‘Korean Surrealism’, contributing to the rich flourishment of Korean literature.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 김현미, "문화번역: 근대적 성찰의 비판적 작업", 문화과학, 27, pp.130~142
  2. 김현미, "글로벌 시대의 문화번역" (2005), 또 하나의 문화
  3. 황현산, "동숭동에서 모이다 -번역의 문화, 문화의 번역", 문화예술, (324) (2007), 한국문화예술 위원회
  4. 가야트리 스피박, "교육기계 안의 바깥에서 in : 9장 번역의 정치", pp.331~366, 갈무리
  5. 더글러스 로빈슨, "번역과 제국" (2002), 동문선
  6. 래나토 로잘도, "문화와 진리" (2000), 아카넷
  7. 존 크라니어스커스, "번역과 문화횡단 작업", 흔적, (1), pp.315~332 (2001)
  8. 클리퍼드 기어츠, "문화의 해석" (1998), 까치
  9. 호미 바바, "문화의 위치" (2002), 소명출판
  10. James Clifford, "문화를 쓴다 : 민족지의 시학과 정치학" (2000), 한국문화사
  11. Susan Bassnett, "Translation, History & Culture" (1995), Cassell
  12. H. Minabad, Hassan, "Culture in Translation and Translation of Culture Specific Items", Translation Studies, 5(2), pp.31~46 (2004)
  13. Lefevere, André, "Translation, History, Culture" (1992), Routledge
  14. 조향, "시의 표기는 마땅히 우리말로" (1959), 신문예
  15. 조향, "데빼이즈망의 미학 in : 한국전후문제시집" (1961), 신구문화사
  16. 조향, "趙鄕全集 1권 시, 2권 시론과 산문" (1994), 열음사
  17. 조향, "아시체 1,2" (1974), 아성출판사
  18. Aude Préta-de Beaufort, "Le surréalisme" (1997), Ellipses
  19. André Breton, "Second Manifeste du surréalisme in : Bibliothèque de la Pléiade" (1988), Gallimard
  20. 고명수, "우리시와 초현실주의", 현대시사상 (1995)
  21. 고명수, "한 아방가르디스트의 모험과 실패-조향론", 한국문학연구 (1992)
  22. 문혜원, "한국 근현대 시론사" (2007), 역락
  23. 문혜원, "조향 시의 상호텍스트성 연구", 국어국문학, (132), pp.305~332 (2002)
  24. 박근영, "한국 초현실주의 시의 비교문학적 연구", 박사, pp.1989
  25. 엄성원, "초현실주의적 지향과 부정의 시학-조향론 in : 한국 전후 문제시인연구 02", pp.137~185 (2005), 예림기획
  26. 오세영, "후반기동인의 시사적 위치", 문학사상, pp.329~340 (1981)
  27. 이미순, "조향 시의 수사학적 읽기", 국어국문학, (125), pp.305~325 (1999)
  28. 조달곤, "파편화의 감각-조향의 시와 시론-", 한국문학논총, pp.307~327 (1998)
  29. 조윤경, "초현실주의와 몸의 상상력" (2008), 문학과 지성사
  30. 황현산, "趙鄕의 초현실주의", 현대시학, pp.229~235 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)