본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

식민지기 제국 일본문학의 번역 양상- 1920년대 신문 연재소설 「불꽃(火華)」과 「불」을 중심으로

The translation feature of the Imperial Japanese literature in the period of Colonial Rule - On the focus of the serial novels, 「Bulkkot」and 「Bulkgot」in the 1920's newspaper -

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

「The Daily News」in the 1920's released the article which induced the Korean workers to emigrate Japanese land. In this context, this appeared the irony situation in the fact that the Paper which had stood up for the Japanese Government-General of Korea in the success of the 1910's wrote the novel, 「Bulkgot」overally exposed the capital issue directly to be connected with the Japan's invasion into the Korea. The fact that the「Bulkgot」added the interest of the story with the excellent illustration and newly tried the communication with the readers is understood in this aspect of the disappeared merit of 「The Daily News」which was the only Korean language paper until 1920's before that the Imperial Japan claimed to advocate the 'cultural politics' and permit the issue of the Korean language newspapers, 『Dong-A ilbo』,『Chosunilbo』,『Sisasinmun』 etc. The serial publishing of the「Bulkgot」in the context of Korean newspaper's field at the 1920's time is the product of the literary circles which should each time provide the reading material in the face of the stiff competition between the newspapers. This「Bulkgot」demolished the proletariat in the form and the bourgeois in the novel of the symmetric equation, and seperated the piece and the author. The omission, drop and revision including the illustration of the rather unprecedented translation text in comparison of the Japanese language text resulted in the contents difference which added the story interest and newly tried the communication with the readers. And in this juncture of the revision, the person directly of the labor struggle was more conscientized, and that scene was increasingly factually featured. In these respects, the「Bulkgot」as the literature of the Fourth Class took the more advantage than other novels. Futhermore we can get a taste of the Korean society fragmentarily in the course of the comparison and review of these two novels and easily confirm the fact that the Japanese counteracted more strongly than the Korean in the face of the ideology crackdown, and the single article than the newspaper within Japan. Although the Korean registration, geographical name, and the wording of the translator induced the readers to read the text in the manner of the 「Bulkgot」handled the Korean society issue at that time not the Japanese, the class issue of the transltion text had extended the problem of nation, not being collected to the Korean society. This is explained in the context that The issues of the labor class and the capital in one state are enlarged to the Colonial and nation problem when interfering with the situation of the Colonial rule. We can easily find in 「Bulkgot」here and there the cases the simple alteration of the language represented the standpoint of the translation principal in the situation of the Colonized. The problem is the fact that as a result of that the 「Bulkkot」and 「Bulkgot」corresponded the Colonial policy of the Imperial Japan which suggested the utopia of the Hokkaido and North Gando unlike real, in the field of the Pro-literature which should point out the capitalism issue and the problem between capitalist and laborer, the domination logic of the Colonial rule still worked.

Abstract

「The Daily News」in the 1920's released the article which induced the Korean workers to emigrate Japanese land. In this context, this appeared the irony situation in the fact that the Paper which had stood up for the Japanese Government-General of Korea in the success of the 1910's wrote the novel, 「Bulkgot」overally exposed the capital issue directly to be connected with the Japan's invasion into the Korea. The fact that the「Bulkgot」added the interest of the story with the excellent illustration and newly tried the communication with the readers is understood in this aspect of the disappeared merit of 「The Daily News」which was the only Korean language paper until 1920's before that the Imperial Japan claimed to advocate the 'cultural politics' and permit the issue of the Korean language newspapers, 『Dong-A ilbo』,『Chosunilbo』,『Sisasinmun』 etc. The serial publishing of the「Bulkgot」in the context of Korean newspaper's field at the 1920's time is the product of the literary circles which should each time provide the reading material in the face of the stiff competition between the newspapers. This「Bulkgot」demolished the proletariat in the form and the bourgeois in the novel of the symmetric equation, and seperated the piece and the author. The omission, drop and revision including the illustration of the rather unprecedented translation text in comparison of the Japanese language text resulted in the contents difference which added the story interest and newly tried the communication with the readers. And in this juncture of the revision, the person directly of the labor struggle was more conscientized, and that scene was increasingly factually featured. In these respects, the「Bulkgot」as the literature of the Fourth Class took the more advantage than other novels. Futhermore we can get a taste of the Korean society fragmentarily in the course of the comparison and review of these two novels and easily confirm the fact that the Japanese counteracted more strongly than the Korean in the face of the ideology crackdown, and the single article than the newspaper within Japan. Although the Korean registration, geographical name, and the wording of the translator induced the readers to read the text in the manner of the 「Bulkgot」handled the Korean society issue at that time not the Japanese, the class issue of the transltion text had extended the problem of nation, not being collected to the Korean society. This is explained in the context that The issues of the labor class and the capital in one state are enlarged to the Colonial and nation problem when interfering with the situation of the Colonial rule. We can easily find in 「Bulkgot」here and there the cases the simple alteration of the language represented the standpoint of the translation principal in the situation of the Colonized. The problem is the fact that as a result of that the 「Bulkkot」and 「Bulkgot」corresponded the Colonial policy of the Imperial Japan which suggested the utopia of the Hokkaido and North Gando unlike real, in the field of the Pro-literature which should point out the capitalism issue and the problem between capitalist and laborer, the domination logic of the Colonial rule still worked.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. "신문 『大阪毎日新聞』( 『東京日日新聞』), 『매일신보』, 『동아일보』, 『조선일보』, 『신한민보』, 『시대일보』, 『독립신문』", ~
  2. 김모란, "‘아일랜드’의 전유, 그 욕망의 ‘이동(移動)’을 따라서", 사이間SAI, (7), pp.235~272 (2009), 국제한국문학문화학회
  3. 김병길, "역사소설, 자미(滋味)에 빠지다", pp.205~226 (2011), 삼인
  4. 김병철, "한국 근대 번역 문학사 연구", pp.690~691 (1998), 을유문화사
  5. 김영동, "한국소설에 수용된 북간도", 새국어교육, 35, pp.300~311 (1982), 한국국어교육
  6. 김윤식, "한국근대문예비평사 연구", pp.31~32 (1976), 일지사
  7. 김재석, "1920년대 <인형의 집> 번역에 대한 연구", 한국극예술연구, (36), pp.11~36 (2012), 한국극예술학회[DOI]
  8. 박진영, "문학청년으로서 번역가 이상수와 번역의 운명", 돈암어문학, 24, pp.59~88 (2011), 돈암어문학회
  9. 박헌호, "‘文化政治’期 新聞의 位相과 反-檢閱의 內的論理― 1920年代 民間紙를 中心으로", 대동문화연구, (50), pp.199~259 (2005), 대동문화연구원
  10. 비즐리(W. G.), "일본 근현대사", pp.195~210 (2006), 을유문화사
  11. 스즈키 토미, "이야기된 자기", pp.30~31 (2004), 나무의생각
  12. 신명직, "안석영 만문만화(漫文漫畵) 연구", 현대문학의 연구, 17, pp.7~67 (2001), 한국문학연구학회
  13. 신하경, "기쿠치 칸(菊池寛) 멜로드라마의 현재성 ― 『동경행진곡(東京行進曲)』을 중심으로 ―", 일본학보, (95), pp.123~138 (2013), 한국일본학회
  14. 역사학연구소, "메이데이 100년의 역사", pp.46~47 (2004), 서해문집
  15. 요시미 슌야, "냉전 체제와 자본의 문화", pp.131~156 (2013), 소명출판
  16. 이민희, "일제강점기 제국일본 문학의 번안 양상― 1920년대 『매일신보』 연재소설 「汝等의 背後로셔」를 중심으로 ―", 일본학보, (93), pp.151~165 (2012), 한국일본학회
  17. 이승희, "1920년대 신문 만평의 사회주의 정치와 문화적 효과", 상허학보, 22, pp.77~115 (2008), 상허학회
  18. 朝鮮硏究會, "大京城", pp.65~72 (1925), 朝鮮硏究會
  19. 채호석, "검열과 문학장 -1930년대 후반 한국문학에서의 검열과 문학장의 관계 양상-", 외국문학연구, (27), pp.309~334 (2007), 외국문학연구소
  20. 하타노 세쓰코, "이광수와 야마사키 토시오, 그리고 기쿠치 칸 ― 「삼경인상기」에 씌어 있지 않은 것", 사이間SAI, (11), pp.9~30 (2011), 국제한국문학문화학회
  21. 김정진, "한국문학의 이해", pp.239~240 (1999), 한국외국어대학교출판부
  22. 홍선영, "기쿠치 간(菊池寛)과 조선예술상* ―제국의 예술제도와 히에라르키―", 日本文化學報, (50), pp.235~254 (2011), 한국일본문화학회
  23. 홍선영, "기쿠치 간「아버지 돌아오다」(1917)론-표박자(漂迫者)의 귀환과 ‘광기’-", 日本語文學, 1(58), pp.203~220 (2013), 한국일본어문학회
  24. 永嶺重敏, "モダン都市の読書空間", pp.157~ (2001), 日本エディターズスクール出版
  25. 片山宏行, "菊池寛「火華」", pp.71~84 (1998)
  26. 片山宏行, "菊池寛のうしろ影", pp.115~134 (2000), 未知谷
  27. 菊池寛, "火華", pp.382~383 (1922), 大阪毎日新聞社(ほか)
  28. 岸雅子, "〈通俗小説〉における労働者ー菊池寛『火華』論", 早稲田大学大学院教育 学研究科紀要 別冊(12-2), 50~ (2005)
  29. 木村常俊, "北海道の歴史", pp.136~191 (1996), 三省堂
  30. 紅野謙介, "検閲と文学ー1920年代の攻防", pp.19~ (2009), 河出書房新社
  31. 高木健夫, "新聞小説史 大正篇", pp.221~ (1976), 国書刊行会
  32. 日高昭二, "共同体の資本論--菊池寛再考のために", 日本文学, 48(11), pp.31~42 (1999), 日本文学 協会
  33. 日本文学協会, "日本文学講座8 評論", pp.116~ (1987), 大修館書店
  34. 前田愛, "近代読者の成立", pp.173~177 (1973), 有精堂
  35. 許粹烈, "植民地朝鮮の開発と民衆", pp.142~ (2008), 明石書店
  36. Kim, Ki-hoon, "Japanese policy for Korean rural immigration to Manchukuo, 1932-1945", pp.1992

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)