호락에서 미발지각의 정중동(靜中動)에 관한 논쟁 -이현익과 권상하․한원진의 논쟁 및 낙학에서의 논쟁-

Abstract

Perception at the Not-Yet Arouse State in Mind is not dark because of having yang, and this is Ho and Rak Group’s common point. Yi Hyeonik, a member of Rak group, argued that perception is no dark, the not-yet aroused state(未發), and it means quiet(靜) against Gwon Sangha’s argument, the perception meaning motion inside quiet(靜中動). Gwon has based on Zhu Xi’s reponse to Zhang Qinfu and so he argued the perception meaning motion inside quiet because it is Fu(䷗), which six at the beginning is yang. By contrast, Yi regarded that of Gwon as an imperfect theory of Zhu.‘s early years and so he argued Zhu’s response to Lu Ziyue as a perfect theory of Zhu.‘s latter years. This is Kun(䷁), which of no yang line and so means quiet. On Yi’s criticism of Gwon, Han Wonjin, a student of Gwon and member of Ho group, criticized against Yi, because although Kun has yang gi and so the perception means motion inside quiet. Yi has also regarded it as having a little yang gi but because it has yang line and so the perception has no motion. This debate developed to between Yi and Park Pilju in Rak group, and Yi’s argument is repeat. On this debate, Kim Changheup, a representative of Rak group, commented and he regarded Zhu Xi’s reponse to Zhang Qinfu as a perfect theory of Zhu.‘s latter years as well as Gwon, so Park’s argument is close to Kim. Kim and Park in Rak group have a common point with Gwon and Han in Ho group. Although Yi is a member in Rak group, he has a difference between Kim and Park. Therefore, this was different from the Veritable Records of King Jeongjo’s classification, Han as a member of Ho group and Kim as a member of Rak group, which they had a debate because a difference between their arguments.