『정조실록』에서 호락의 미발논쟁 연구 - 김창흡 ‧ 이재 대 한원진‧심조의 논쟁 및 이간과 비교를 중심으로

Abstract

In the Veritable Records in King Jeongjo’s Regime, the core of Horak debate whether only orginal nature is or with physical nature in the Not-Yet Aroused State. At the time, Sin Myeonggwan, a member of Rak group, crticized Han Wonjin’s, a member of Ho group, argument that the Not-Yet Aroused State has not only original nature but also physical nature, and Kim Changheup agreed with Sin’s criticism. Sim Jo, a member of Ho group, that of Rak group, Sin and Kim, and Han agreed not only Sim’s criticism of Kim but also crticized Sin and Kim in more detail. This debate has between Han and Yi Gan in Ho group. Kim and Yi have a common point. Yi Gan argued both equilibrium and no equilibrium, a stiffened mind, in the Not-Aroused State. Kim also mentioned a stiffened mind, so it has a common point with Yi Gan, but Kim did not divide the Not-Arroused State so. This is different from Yi. Sim Jo had a debate with Yi Jae, a representative of Rak group, and Yi Jae argued that the Not-Yet Aroused State has only orginal gi, so it is a pure good. Yi Jae’s argument has a common point with Kim and Yi Gan but has a difference with them.