본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

인권 주창자로서의 로렌스: 들뢰즈와의 비교 연구

D. H. Lawrence as a Human Rights Advocate: A Comparative Study of Lawrence and Deleuze

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This article attempts to newly illuminate D. H. Lawrence as a pioneering human rights advocate through the comparison with Deleuze. Here, the issue of human rights is addressed from the perspective of humanities, not from that of law and politics. By comparing Lawrence with Deleuze, the meaning of human rights is discussed in a more fundamental dimension as well. Both Lawrence and Deleuze advocate the innate right of the freedom of individuals, not persons—a flight from the fixed personal identity and customary framework. This flight can be possible in the process of becoming one with nature in the impersonal dimension. Aside from their seeming similarities, however, there are stark differences between them. Individuation for Deleuze is related with unique chances and singularity. He does not give serious consideration to an individual as a living reality. In contrast to Deleuze, an individual with its free-proud singleness and individuality is a lifetime concern for Lawrence. This difference leads Lawrence and Deleuze to have different attitudes towards human rights. As distinct from Deleuze, Lawrence advocates the human rights of an individual, which include not only its freedom but also a duty to respect others’ rights. It is eloquently demonstrated in Lawrence’s original vision of a true human relationship.

Abstract

This article attempts to newly illuminate D. H. Lawrence as a pioneering human rights advocate through the comparison with Deleuze. Here, the issue of human rights is addressed from the perspective of humanities, not from that of law and politics. By comparing Lawrence with Deleuze, the meaning of human rights is discussed in a more fundamental dimension as well. Both Lawrence and Deleuze advocate the innate right of the freedom of individuals, not persons—a flight from the fixed personal identity and customary framework. This flight can be possible in the process of becoming one with nature in the impersonal dimension. Aside from their seeming similarities, however, there are stark differences between them. Individuation for Deleuze is related with unique chances and singularity. He does not give serious consideration to an individual as a living reality. In contrast to Deleuze, an individual with its free-proud singleness and individuality is a lifetime concern for Lawrence. This difference leads Lawrence and Deleuze to have different attitudes towards human rights. As distinct from Deleuze, Lawrence advocates the human rights of an individual, which include not only its freedom but also a duty to respect others’ rights. It is eloquently demonstrated in Lawrence’s original vision of a true human relationship.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 강미숙, "오이디푸스 콤플렉스를 넘어서: 로렌스와 들뢰즈의 정신분석학 비판", D.H. 로렌스 연구, 19(1), pp.1~22 (2011), 한국로렌스학회[DOI]
  2. 고영란, "비전의 극적 형상화의 성과와 한계: 『연애하는 여인들』 연구", D.H. 로렌스 연구, 16(1), pp.27~46 (2008), 한국로렌스학회[DOI]
  3. 김성호, "“주체 없는 개체화”?: 들뢰즈와 로런스에 있어서의 개체성", 영미문학연구, (9), pp.5~44 (2005), 영미문학연구회
  4. 질 들뢰즈, "천 개의 고원: 자본주의와 분열증 2" (2001), 새물결
  5. 질 들뢰즈, "안티 오이디푸스: 자본주의와 정신분열증 1" (2014), 민음사
  6. 백낙청, "서양의 개벽사상가 D. H. 로런스" (2020), 창비
  7. 이진경, "철학과 굴뚝청소부" (2005), 그린비
  8. Deleuze, Gilles, "Dialogues" (1987), Columbia UP
  9. Hardy, Thomas, "Tess of the d’Urbervilles" (1978), Penguin
  10. Lawrence, D. H., "Women in Love" (2001), 신아사
  11. Lawrence, D. H., "Reflections on the Death of a Porcupine and Other Essays", pp.61~83 (1988), Cambridge UP
  12. Lawrence, D. H., "The Letters of D. H. Lawrence, Vol. 2: 1913-1916" (1981), Cambridge UP
  13. Lawrence, D. H., "Phoenix: The Posthumous Papers of D. H. Lawrence", pp.398~516 (1972), Viking Press
  14. Lawrence, D. H, "Fantasia of the Unconscious and Psychoanalysis and the Unconscious" (1986), Penguin
  15. Lawrence, D. H., "Study of Thomas Hardy and Other Essays", pp.191~198 (1985), Cambridge UP
  16. Masschelein, Anneleen, "Modernism and Theory", pp.23~39 (2008), Routledge
  17. Worthen, John. D. H, "Lawrence and the Idea of the Novel" (1979), Macmillan

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)