노마디즘 관점에서 로렌스의 Aaron’s Rod 다시 읽기
Reassessment of D.H. Lawrence’s Aaron’s Rod from the Perspective of Gill Deleuze
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
D.H. Lawrence’s characters are mostly restless and nomadic; one of them is Aaron Sisson, the protagonist in Aaron’s Rod(1922). It is no accident that Lawrence is one of Gill Deleuze’s favorite writers. This paper aims to explicate the novel under discussion from the perspective of Gill Deleuze, particularly in terms of nomadism coined by him. Deleuze’s key notions such as becoming, rhizome, and nomadism, to name a few, are highly applicable to analyzing Lawrence’s characters. Above all, Lawrence reacted against such ideas as sameness and being fixed (or the old stable ego) in favor of singularity and creativity. To begin, some motives for being nomadic in the aftermath of the First World War will be discussed. Then, this paper will chart nomadic spaces such as London and Florence. Thirdly, this paper will draw attention to rhizomic connextion leading to horizontal and unhierarchical relationships. It is well known that Lawrence had a strong objection to the possessive will which destroys a mutual respect and imposes a submission. Alternatively, Lawrence sought after a new mode of being fully charged with life-force or vitality. Aaron celebrates a spontaneous and new life in Florence, denouncing English tightness and self-consciousness. The nomadic subject refuses to be trapped by both home-comfort ideology and state (war) ideology. The importance of this study lies in identifying the common ground shared by Lawrence the writer and Deleuze the thinker, more importantly, applying Deleuzean key words to a practical analysis of the text. This fresh attempt goes beyond the existing Freudian, Feminist, and Cultural (or Political) approaches, confirming that Lawrence questions and challenges the dominant established order by creating the nomadic subject.
Abstract
D.H. Lawrence’s characters are mostly restless and nomadic; one of them is Aaron Sisson, the protagonist in Aaron’s Rod(1922). It is no accident that Lawrence is one of Gill Deleuze’s favorite writers. This paper aims to explicate the novel under discussion from the perspective of Gill Deleuze, particularly in terms of nomadism coined by him. Deleuze’s key notions such as becoming, rhizome, and nomadism, to name a few, are highly applicable to analyzing Lawrence’s characters. Above all, Lawrence reacted against such ideas as sameness and being fixed (or the old stable ego) in favor of singularity and creativity. To begin, some motives for being nomadic in the aftermath of the First World War will be discussed. Then, this paper will chart nomadic spaces such as London and Florence. Thirdly, this paper will draw attention to rhizomic connextion leading to horizontal and unhierarchical relationships. It is well known that Lawrence had a strong objection to the possessive will which destroys a mutual respect and imposes a submission. Alternatively, Lawrence sought after a new mode of being fully charged with life-force or vitality. Aaron celebrates a spontaneous and new life in Florence, denouncing English tightness and self-consciousness. The nomadic subject refuses to be trapped by both home-comfort ideology and state (war) ideology. The importance of this study lies in identifying the common ground shared by Lawrence the writer and Deleuze the thinker, more importantly, applying Deleuzean key words to a practical analysis of the text. This fresh attempt goes beyond the existing Freudian, Feminist, and Cultural (or Political) approaches, confirming that Lawrence questions and challenges the dominant established order by creating the nomadic subject.
참고문헌 (23)
- 가타리, 펠릭스, "분자혁명" (1998), 푸른숲
- 김정매, "로렌스의 생태주의적 사유: 노마드적 “됨”과 끝없는 “탈주”", D.H. 로렌스 연구, 10(1), pp.1~ (2002), 한국로렌스학회
- 들뢰즈, 질, "앙띠 오이디푸스" (1997), 민음사
- 김재인, "천 개의 고원." (2001), 새물결출판사
- 박시영, "상징주의적 재현 파괴: D. H. 로렌스의 아론의 지팡이", D.H. 로렌스 연구, 13(2), pp.177~194 (2005), 한국로렌스학회
- 최영진, "들뢰즈와 그 적들", pp.61~100 (2006), 우물이있는집
- 정영호, "로렌스의 “지도자 소설” 재평가 - Aaron's Rod를 중심으로 -", D.H. 로렌스 연구, 10(2), pp.7~199 (2002), 한국로렌스학회
- 최영진, "들뢰즈와 그 적들", pp.361~394 (2006), 우물이있는집
- 오영진, "니체와 로렌스: ‘권력에의 의지’의 역사", D.H. 로렌스 연구, 20(1), pp.47~74 (2012), 한국로렌스학회[DOI]
- 육홍분, "Aaron’s Rod에 나타난 반여성주의 고찰", 로렌스연구, 8(1), pp.135~156 (2000)
- 이진경, "노마디즘 1: 천의 고원을 넘나드는 유쾌한 철학적 유목" (2002), 휴머니스트
- 이진경, "노마디즘 2 : 천의 고원을 넘나드는 유쾌한 철학적 유목" (2002), 휴머니스트
- 장시기, "들뢰즈의 로렌스― ｢용감한 거북이｣의 생산하는 욕망과 생성의 시간", 로렌스연구, 12(1), pp.167~183 (2004)
- 최영진, "들뢰즈와 그 적들", pp.35~58 (2006), 우물이있는집
- 황지헌, "들뢰즈와 문학기계", pp.259~285 (2002), 소명출판
- Baker, Paul G, "A Reassessment of D.H. Lawrence’s Aaron’s Rod" (1983), UMI Research P
- Eagleton, Terry, "Exiles and Emigres" (1970), Chatto & Windus
- Lawrence, D.H, "Aaron’s Rod" (1972), Penguin Books
- Lawrence, D.H, "The Selected Letters of D. H. Lawrence" (2000), Cambridge University P
- Niven, Alastair. D.H, "Lawrence: The Novels" (1978), Cambridge University P
- Schneider, Daniel J. D.H, "Lawrence: The Artist as Psychologist" (1984), UP of Kansas
- Wiener, Gary A, "Profile of an Anti-Hero: Aaron Sisson Reconsidered", D.H. Lawrence Review, 10(1), pp.182~193 (1977)
- Williams, Raymond, "Culture and Society, 1780-1950" (1958), Chatto & Windus