로런스문학에서의 ‘느낌’과 ‘존재’
“Feeling” and “Being” in D. H. Lawrence
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article attempts to illuminate the significance of “feeling” and “being” in the works of D. H. Lawrence with reference to some concepts addressed by theories of affect. Lawrence and Massumi seem to have such affinities as the impersonal, unfixed nature of feeling or affect; anti-Cartesianism; the emphasis on the relations and physicality. However, it is crucial to recognize how Lawrence differs from major philosophers of affect theories. Despite Deleuze’s high appraisal of Lawrence for his radical critique of psychoanalysis and Oedipus complex, in particular, there exist crucial differences between the two authors; the machine, the representative Deleuzian concept turns out to be incompatible with that of ‘life’, or ‘living beings’, the only creative reality in the Lawrencean thought. Also unique is Lawrence’s way of thinking in the Western tradition, which can be neither confined to monism, nor to dualism. My reading of “The Horse-Dealer’s Daughter” targets to prove the inevitability of the intervention of the whole consciousness of readers in responding to a literary work, while challenging the limits of conventional language and characters.
Abstract
This article attempts to illuminate the significance of “feeling” and “being” in the works of D. H. Lawrence with reference to some concepts addressed by theories of affect. Lawrence and Massumi seem to have such affinities as the impersonal, unfixed nature of feeling or affect; anti-Cartesianism; the emphasis on the relations and physicality. However, it is crucial to recognize how Lawrence differs from major philosophers of affect theories. Despite Deleuze’s high appraisal of Lawrence for his radical critique of psychoanalysis and Oedipus complex, in particular, there exist crucial differences between the two authors; the machine, the representative Deleuzian concept turns out to be incompatible with that of ‘life’, or ‘living beings’, the only creative reality in the Lawrencean thought. Also unique is Lawrence’s way of thinking in the Western tradition, which can be neither confined to monism, nor to dualism. My reading of “The Horse-Dealer’s Daughter” targets to prove the inevitability of the intervention of the whole consciousness of readers in responding to a literary work, while challenging the limits of conventional language and characters.
참고문헌 (16)
- 강미숙, "오이디푸스 콤플렉스를 넘어서: 로렌스와 들뢰즈의 정신분석학 비판", D.H. 로렌스 연구, 19(1), pp.1~22 (2011), 한국로렌스학회[DOI]
- 강병희, "“나를 사랑하나요?”: 정동이론으로 바라본 D. H. 로렌스의 「말장수 딸」", D.H. 로렌스 연구, 27(1), pp.1~24 (2019), 한국로렌스학회[DOI]
- 김성호, "로렌스와 스피노자: 접점들과 분기점들", D.H. 로렌스 연구, 27(2), pp.57~74 (2019), 한국로렌스학회[DOI]
- 김성호, "정동적 미메시스: 정동 순환의 매체로서의 소설", 안과밖:영미문학연구, (48), pp.14~38 (2020), 영미문학연구회[DOI]
- 마수미, 브라이언, "정동정치" (2018), 갈무리
- 백낙청, "황찬호교수 정년기념 논문집", pp.157~176 (1987), 명지출판사
- Bell, Michael, "Le coeur a ses raisons....”: Lawrence, Logic and the Life of Feeling", Études Lawrenciennes, 42, pp.21~35 (2011)
- Deleuze, Gilles, "Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia" (1996), U of Minnesota P
- Lawrence, D. H, "Reflections on the Death of a Porcupine and Other Essays", pp.61~83 (1988), Cambridge UP
- Lawrence, D. H, "England, My England" (1990), Cambridge UP
- Lawrence, D. H, "Fantasia of the Unconscious and Psychoanalysis and the Unconscious" (1977), Penguin
- Lawrence, D. H, "Kangaroo" (1994), Cambridge UP
- Lawrence, D. H, "Phoenix: The Posthumous Papers of D. H. Lawrence" (1978), Penguin
- Lawrence, D. H, "Phoenix II: Uncollected, Unpublished, and other Prose Works by D. H. Lawrence" (1978), Penguin
- Lawrence, D. H, "Study of Thomas Hardy and Other Essays" (1985), Cambridge UP
- Massumi, Brian, "Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation" (2002), Duke UP