韓国人日本語学習者の事態把握の一考察-韓国語と日本語の対照を通して-
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research analyses the Korean and Japanese writings of native Korean speakers, where they were asked to fill in cartoon dialogues and then explain the story writing. Incidents where participants' cognitive processing could be studied selected, and these incidents were woven into the cartoon plot. Particular attention was paid to which characters the participants focused, and how they perceived the incident (construal). Results indicate that when the participants wrote in Japanese, they tend to focus on certain characters; also, it is to be noted that empathy to the character, and remembering the relationship themselves and the situation the speaker(writer) has passed party to the story, expression description read it and subjective construal were observed around the passive expression. However, follow-up interview it was found that the participants of almost all rely on rote learning by such a passive expression, even advanced learners, like the Japanese native speaker because life cognitive leads to subjective construal. On the other hand, indicate that when the participants wrote in Korean, they tend to focus on behavior main, so awareness of the cognizing subject has been directed is very fluid. And compared to wrote in Japanese, passive expression is less, a description in the active expression are common. Many of participants have recognized the difference of expression Korean and Japanese, so it was seen difference in construal of both languages. But it was not that led to the expression of cognitive processing such as Japanese speaker. Therefore in the field of learning Japanese, as well as control of mere sentence pattern, while teach enough situations in which Japanese is used representation, to connect to the Japanese of suspect that these is a need to attention.
Abstract
This research analyses the Korean and Japanese writings of native Korean speakers, where they were asked to fill in cartoon dialogues and then explain the story writing. Incidents where participants' cognitive processing could be studied selected, and these incidents were woven into the cartoon plot. Particular attention was paid to which characters the participants focused, and how they perceived the incident (construal). Results indicate that when the participants wrote in Japanese, they tend to focus on certain characters; also, it is to be noted that empathy to the character, and remembering the relationship themselves and the situation the speaker(writer) has passed party to the story, expression description read it and subjective construal were observed around the passive expression. However, follow-up interview it was found that the participants of almost all rely on rote learning by such a passive expression, even advanced learners, like the Japanese native speaker because life cognitive leads to subjective construal. On the other hand, indicate that when the participants wrote in Korean, they tend to focus on behavior main, so awareness of the cognizing subject has been directed is very fluid. And compared to wrote in Japanese, passive expression is less, a description in the active expression are common. Many of participants have recognized the difference of expression Korean and Japanese, so it was seen difference in construal of both languages. But it was not that led to the expression of cognitive processing such as Japanese speaker. Therefore in the field of learning Japanese, as well as control of mere sentence pattern, while teach enough situations in which Japanese is used representation, to connect to the Japanese of suspect that these is a need to attention.
참고문헌 (18)
- 서정수, "국어문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 池上嘉彦, "英語の感覚·日本語の感覚<ことばの意味>のしくみ" (2006), NHKブックス
- 池上嘉彦, ""主観的把握"とは何か-日本語話者における"好まれる言い回し", 月刊言語, pp.20~29 (2006)
- 池上嘉彦, ""認知言語学における"事態把握"-"話す主体"の復権"", 月刊言語, pp.62~70 (2009)
- 池上嘉彦, "日本語の主観性·主体性 , In ひつじ意味論講座第5卷 主観性と主体性", pp.49~67 (2011), ひつじ書房
- 上原聡, "主観性に関する言語の対照と類型, In ひつじ意味論講座第5卷主観性と主体性", pp.69~91 (2011), ひつじ書房
- 奥川育子, "語りの談話における視点と事態把握", 筑波応用言語学研究, 14, pp.31~44 (2007)
- 小野寺美智子, "日英語の受動構文の認知的基礎-"事態把握"の観点から-", 拓殖大学言語研究, (119), pp.11~31 (2008)
- 강미선, "運用能力を高めるための文法指導への提案-日本語科書におけるテクル文型を中心に-", 일본문화연구, 25(25), pp.21~36 (2008), 동아시아일본학회
- 許明子, "日本語の韓国語の受身文の対照研究" (2004), ひつじ書房
- 近藤安月子, "中国語母語話者日本語学習者の事態把握-日本語主専攻学習者を対象とする 調査から-", 認知言語学会論文集, 10, pp.690~709 (2010)
- 近藤安月子, "韓国語母語日本語学習者の事態把握-中上級·上級学習者の場合-", 韓国日本語 学会 第26回学術発表会論文集, pp.221~225 (2012)
- 迫田久美子, "日本語教育に生かす第二言語習得研究" (2002), アルク
- 徐珉廷, "日本語話者と韓国語話者における主観的な<事態把握>の対象研究-"ていく", てくる"と"e kata, 박사, pp.昭和女子大学[DOI]
- 松井一美, "日本語母語話者とロシア語母語話者の日本語発話データによる<主観的把握>と<客観的把握>", 認知言語 学会論文集, 10, pp.147~150 (2010)
- 村木新次郎, "日本語動詞の諸相" (1991), ひつじ書房
- Langacker, Ronald. W, "Observation and speculations on subjectivity, In Iconisity in syntax", pp.109~150 (1985), John Benjamins
- 金秀珍, "調査資料イラスト", 박사
