教養日本語講座における教授法と学習スタイルの比較分析-新羅大学教養課程大学の教師と学習者に対するアンケート調査を通して-
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The role of teacher has sifted from the leader of the class or the one who gives students only knowledge to the helper for students when they are active as the main participants of language class. In such a movement, the most important thing for developing the ability of Japanese language is to know how students are taught in class as well as students' learning style. This research conducted questionnaires targeted at Japanese language teachers and students in Liberal Arts course of Silla University to compare the teachers’ teaching method and the learning style of learners. In this paper, first, we report on the results of questionnaire for teachers measured by factor analysis, and compare these results and the results of questionnaire for students referred in Kim and Akiha (2013). The factor analysis of the results of questionnaire for teachers identified two factors, “Assignment and Basic Learning Activity” and “Conversation and Pronunciation Practice and Applicational Activity”. The analysis by unpaird t-test revealed that Korean teachers showed significant differences (1%) in the score of the contents of “Assignment and Basic Learning Activity”, and also Japanese teachers showed significant differences (5%) on “Conversation and Pronunciation Practice and Applicational Activity”. These results suggest that the difference occurred due to team-teaching system in which Korean teachers are in charge of the grammar class and Japanese teachers are conversation class.
Abstract
The role of teacher has sifted from the leader of the class or the one who gives students only knowledge to the helper for students when they are active as the main participants of language class. In such a movement, the most important thing for developing the ability of Japanese language is to know how students are taught in class as well as students' learning style. This research conducted questionnaires targeted at Japanese language teachers and students in Liberal Arts course of Silla University to compare the teachers’ teaching method and the learning style of learners. In this paper, first, we report on the results of questionnaire for teachers measured by factor analysis, and compare these results and the results of questionnaire for students referred in Kim and Akiha (2013). The factor analysis of the results of questionnaire for teachers identified two factors, “Assignment and Basic Learning Activity” and “Conversation and Pronunciation Practice and Applicational Activity”. The analysis by unpaird t-test revealed that Korean teachers showed significant differences (1%) in the score of the contents of “Assignment and Basic Learning Activity”, and also Japanese teachers showed significant differences (5%) on “Conversation and Pronunciation Practice and Applicational Activity”. These results suggest that the difference occurred due to team-teaching system in which Korean teachers are in charge of the grammar class and Japanese teachers are conversation class.
참고문헌 (13)
- 고이즈미, "日本語教授法의 諸問題", 외국학연구, (4), pp.269~284 (2000), 중앙대학교 외국어문학연구소
- 김세련, "日本語敎育의 效率性 創出을 위한 學習者 滿足度 現況分析-新羅大學校 敎養SJP*팀티칭 事例를 中心으로-", 일어일문학연구, 79(1), pp.107~128 (2011), 한국일어일문학회
- 김세련, "新羅大 敎養日本語 팀티칭 授業에 있어 敎授者 滿足度 分析", 日語学研究, (35), pp.399~423 (2012), 檀國大學校 日本硏究所
- 정기영, "부산지역 고등학교의 일본어 교수법에 관한 실태조사", 外大論叢, 20, pp.101-132~101 (2000)
- 조문희, "한국의 일본어 교수법 변천사", 일본어교육연구, 19, pp.79~79 (2005)
- 최광준, "뉴라인 일본어1" (2009), 다락원
- 최광준, "뉴라인 일본어2" (2009), 다락원
- 小塩真司, "SPSSとAmosによる心理·調査データ解析─因子分析·共分散構造分析まで" (2004), 東京図書株式会社
- 金世連, "日本語学習者の学習スタイル及び授業に対するニーズ分析ー新羅大学教養課程大学における日本語学習者に対するアンケート調査を通してー", 東アジア日本語教育·日本文化研究学会-2013年度国際学術発表大 会発表要旨文, pp.61~ (2013)
- 澤田田津子, "日本語教授法に関する議論の流れについてーコミュニカティブ·アプローチの現在ー", 社会言語科学, 6(1), pp.138~148 (2003)
- 日本語教育学会編, "新版日本語教育事典", pp.725~751 (2005), 大修館書店
- 藤田裕子, "外国語学習スタイルに関する日本·韓国·中国共通の尺度作成の試み", 言語科学論集, (6), pp.107~118 (2002), 東北大学
- Hayashi Masato, "Japanese student's learning style preferences in the EFL classroom", Bulletin of Hokuriku University, 28, pp.83~93 (2004)
