진술부사에 관한 일고찰(1) -「もし」「万一」「きっと」를 중심으로 -
A study on the modal adverb - With the Cases of "Moshi" "Manichi" and "Kitto"-
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper attempts to analyze the problems with the establishment of a modal adverb and their causes, focusing on the problems of the conventional theory of setting up words classified as a modal adverb on the basis of a formal concord phenomenon. Also, this study aims to reconsider the location of the modality and the function of the modal adverb. It then attempts to establish appropriate locations of words that fail to meet the new definition of the modal adverb, i.e. "moshi, manichi" and "kitto," which many scholars traditionally assign as modal adverbs based on the phenomenon of concord. This paper defines modal adverb as a word modifying a single independent sentence(i.e. proposition+mood) and an equivalent to what Tokieda defines as "ji." Based on this, "moshi, manichi" fall short of this new definition, but they are instead conditional adverbs, while "kitto" is defined as a quasi-modal adverb, referring to words that have charateristics of a modal adverb but are not fully established as such because examples included in noun modifiers have collected.
Abstract
This paper attempts to analyze the problems with the establishment of a modal adverb and their causes, focusing on the problems of the conventional theory of setting up words classified as a modal adverb on the basis of a formal concord phenomenon. Also, this study aims to reconsider the location of the modality and the function of the modal adverb. It then attempts to establish appropriate locations of words that fail to meet the new definition of the modal adverb, i.e. "moshi, manichi" and "kitto," which many scholars traditionally assign as modal adverbs based on the phenomenon of concord. This paper defines modal adverb as a word modifying a single independent sentence(i.e. proposition+mood) and an equivalent to what Tokieda defines as "ji." Based on this, "moshi, manichi" fall short of this new definition, but they are instead conditional adverbs, while "kitto" is defined as a quasi-modal adverb, referring to words that have charateristics of a modal adverb but are not fully established as such because examples included in noun modifiers have collected.
참고문헌 (15)
- 市川孝, "岩波講座日本語6 文法Ⅰ", pp.236~ (1976), 岩波書店
- 奥津敬一郎, "生成日本文法論", pp.41~75 (1974), 大修館書店
- 工藤浩, "研究報告集(3)", pp.72~ (1982), 秀英出版
- 工藤浩, "モダリティ", pp.163~234 (2000), 岩波書店
- 阪倉篤義, "改稿日本文法の話", pp.236~237 (1985), 敎育出版
- 鈴木重幸, "日本語文法․形態論", pp.476~477 (1972), むぎ書房
- TAKAHASHI MIHO, "思考動詞「思う」のモーダル化 -引用構文との比較を中心に-", 일어일문학연구, 94(1), pp.333~351 (2015), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
- 竹内美智子, "品詞別日本文法講座第5巻", pp.72~146 (1973), 明治書院
- 時枝誠記, "日本文法口語篇", pp.48~55 (1986), 岩波書店
- 橋本進吉, "日本文法体系論", pp.116~118 (1967), 岩波書店
- 橋本進吉, "國文法研究", pp.45~ (1972), 岩波書店
- 原田登美, "否定との関係による副詞の四分類", 国語学, (128), pp.122~ (1982), 武蔵野書院
- 山田孝雄, "日本口語法講義", pp.134~136 (1925), 宝文館
- 山田孝雄, "日本文法概論", pp.148~150 (1936), 宝文館
- 渡辺実, "国語構文論", pp.69~ (1971), 塙書房