한일근대여성문학에 나타난 기혼자의 ‘연애(恋愛)’ 고찰 - 김명순의 『외로운사람들』과 다무라 도시코(田村俊子)의 『포락의 형벌(炮烙の刑)』을 중심으로 -

Abstract

This paper is one of the modern discourse of ‘Yeonae(Renai)-love’ for Korea's first modern female writer, Kim, Myeongsun “lonely people” and Japan's first modern female writer Tamura, Toshiko of the ”Houraku-no-kei(炮烙の刑)“ shown in the center of the love of married comparison, were investigated. “Houraku-no-kei” the ‘love’ feelings about the concentration, as an individual, if so dug, “lonely people” talk a lot of ‘love’ around that can be organically connected. At the time the love of a married woman ‘adultery' is considered as the rights of women historically have been suppressed, was found in the Legislative facts. We look at “Houraku-no-kei” Ryuko married love ‘adultery’ and close, yet one of the modern concept of 'Renai' had come not far away. In contrast, the love of a married man, as well as customary in Japan, at the time of the criminal law can be seen, was not guilty. Until Korea is a colony that adultery ‘pair of men to punish the’ apply, but the occupation of Japan as Japan's criminal law and apply the same laws were applied. Therefore, as well as the love of a married man was not guilty of adultery is. Ryuko of “Houraku-no-kei” and Sunchul of “lonely people”, as a married man and woman not his spouse ‘Yeonae:Renai’ feelings were exchanges. Ryuko's love did not have sexual relations in light of the fact that the time was popular among modern intellectuals ‘Yeonae/Renai’ is none other than. Modern intellectuals recognized the divine and sublime love was present, such a practice is active, married women for dating and can not be ruled out that seems to have recognized. On the other hand, Sunchul is married to Soonyoung that he several times had the opportunity to reveal the confession does not even through third parties will be notified. Sunchul lies broken due to the depth of Soonyoung eventually die, but he was no fault of his own, rather than ‘the evil of early marriage as’ a shift that makes the wrong. Sunchul's ‘love’ was a divine rather than the fault of the social customs, anxious for an excuse that due to the selfishness of a man is shown to be an expression of thought.