본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일본 아리타의 조선도공 이참평에 관한 연구

A study of Korean potter Lee ChamPyong at Arita Japan

노성환
대한일어일문학회 (The Japanese Language And Literature Society Of Korea)|2014.05|일어일문학 (The Japanese Language and Literature Association of Korea)|제62호|pp. 293-313|DOI 10.18631/jalali.2014..62.016

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

SagaArita佐賀李參平金江三兵衛有田陶山神社Lee ChampyongKanegae SanbeiDozan shrine
주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This article is about the Arita potter Lee ChamPyong study. His Japanese name were known asKanegae Sanbei, but his real name, hometown, and the purpose of migration to Japan is not clear. But,he was migrated with the Japanese troops in Japanese invasion of Korea (1592) and met with the BaekJa Gwang. Also, He is the one that brought the prosperity to the Arita by production of the china. Hewasn’t became a God right after his death. After the transition to private enterprise and developing newmarket in Meiji period, Arita needed a progenitor. There were myth and shrine about Joseon potter andno discrimination against the Joseon people in Arita. Most suitable person to the qualification forprogenitor was the Kanagae Sanbei. The name of the Lee ChamPyong was combined with the ‘Imo’ and‘Sanbei’. Kume Kunitage, one of the key person who has in this process, called ‘李氏三平' but laterchanged to the Lee ChamPyong and enshrined in Dozan shrine. His lionization work were continued. Ishiba shrine enshrined the statue of the Lee Champyong with the wearing Korean traditional clothesHanbok. Also, his monuments were built in Aritawa Taku and Korea. He was called Baekshin(白神), asa God of the white porcelain, to the movie professionals. Lee Champyong was a figure that grandlyenshrined in modern and contemporary age.

Abstract

This article is about the Arita potter Lee ChamPyong study. His Japanese name were known asKanegae Sanbei, but his real name, hometown, and the purpose of migration to Japan is not clear. But,he was migrated with the Japanese troops in Japanese invasion of Korea (1592) and met with the BaekJa Gwang. Also, He is the one that brought the prosperity to the Arita by production of the china. Hewasn’t became a God right after his death. After the transition to private enterprise and developing newmarket in Meiji period, Arita needed a progenitor. There were myth and shrine about Joseon potter andno discrimination against the Joseon people in Arita. Most suitable person to the qualification forprogenitor was the Kanagae Sanbei. The name of the Lee ChamPyong was combined with the ‘Imo’ and‘Sanbei’. Kume Kunitage, one of the key person who has in this process, called ‘李氏三平' but laterchanged to the Lee ChamPyong and enshrined in Dozan shrine. His lionization work were continued. Ishiba shrine enshrined the statue of the Lee Champyong with the wearing Korean traditional clothesHanbok. Also, his monuments were built in Aritawa Taku and Korea. He was called Baekshin(白神), asa God of the white porcelain, to the movie professionals. Lee Champyong was a figure that grandlyenshrined in modern and contemporary age.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 김수현, "16·17세기 비전도자에 대한 일고찰", 석사, 역사교육, pp.2007
  2. 김충식, "슬픈 열도-영원한 이방인 사백년의 기록-", pp.231~ (2006), 효형출판
  3. 신봉승, "한글한자문화", pp.18~19 (2008), 전국한자교육추진총연합회
  4. 신일철, "문학사상(10)" (1976), 문학사상사
  5. 신일철, "일본문화의 뿌리 한국<구원회편>", pp.30~ (1986), 상서각
  6. 신혜원, "도장(陶匠) 사카이다카키에몬(酒井田右衛)에 관한 고찰", 일본문화연구, (21), pp.85~97 (2007), 동아시아일본학회
  7. 우동규, "조선도공들의 도자기 발달과 후예들", 일본학, 6, pp.216~219 (1987), 동국대 일본학연구소
  8. 윤용이, "조선초기 도자와 일본 도자에의 영향", 일본연구, 9, pp.36~ (1994), 한국외대 일본연구소
  9. 이미숙, "조선사기장 李參平의 피납과정과 활동에 관한 연구", 인문과학연구, (26), pp.227~248 (2010), 인문과학연구소
  10. 정성일, "한국과 일본, 왜곡과 콤플렉스의 역사", pp.101~ (1993), 자작나무
  11. 최승범, "조선도공을 생각한다", pp.116~122 (1994), 신영출판사
  12. 森淳, "李參平과 有田白磁의 發展", 미술사연구, (6), pp.154~ (1991), 미술사연구회
  13. 有田町歷史編纂委員會, "有田町史 商業編(2)", pp.217~ (1985), 有田町
  14. 今泉元佑, "陶祖李參平と磁器の創始", 陶說, 332, pp.41~ (1980), 日本陶磁器協會
  15. 馬渡八太郞, "李氏は日本磁器の元祖(上)(下)", 肥前史談, 10(4), pp.17~ (1937), 肥前史學會
  16. 金達壽, "日本の中の朝鮮文化(9)-肥前ほか肥後(長崎県, 佐賀県, 熊本県)-", 月刊 韓國文化, 4, pp.9~ (1988), 自由社
  17. 倉田芳郞, "磁器へのあこがれ", pp.30~32 (1994), 多久市敎育委員會
  18. 小松和彦, "神になった人びと", pp.11~12 (2001), 淡交社
  19. 小宮木代良, "<陶祖>言說の成立と展開", 九州史學, 153, pp.61~66 (2009), 九州史學硏究會
  20. 中島浩氣, "肥前陶磁史考", pp.444~ (1936), 肥前陶磁史考刊行會
  21. 中里紀元, "秀吉の朝鮮侵攻と民衆, 文祿の役(上)", pp.271~ (1993), 文獻出版
  22. 松本源次, "皿山なぜなぜ", pp.24~ (1989), 有田町敎育委員會
  23. 三衫隆敏, "歷史読本 日本と韓国.朝鮮の2000年", pp.119~ (1985), 新人物往來社
  24. 三杉隆敏, "やきもの文化史", pp.156~ (1989), 岩波書店
  25. 三上次男, "日本. 朝鮮陶磁史硏究", pp.110~111 (1989), 中央公論美術出版
  26. 宮地武彦, "肥前伊万里の昔話と伝說", pp.429~430 (1986), 三彌井書店
  27. 吉永陽三, "李氏朝鮮王朝の陶工たちの恩惠", 葉隱硏究, (48), pp.14~ (2002), 葉隱硏究會

관련 논문AI추천

일본 하기의 조선도공 미와가에 관한 연구노성환대한일어일문학회 · 일어일문학2019 · 제83호일본의 조선 여성 도공 백파선노성환한국일어일문학회 · 일어일문학연구2020 · 제112권 일본 사가현 아리타의 조선도공에 관한 일고찰노성환대한일어일문학회 · 일어일문학2009 · 제42호일본 하기의 조선도공 이작광과 이경노성환동북아시아문화학회 · 동북아 문화연구2019 · 제1권 제61호‘백파선(百婆仙)’연구 : ‘여성 도공’으로서의 의미를 중심으로김선미한국여성연구원 · 여성학논집2023 · 제40권 제2호일본 나가사키현 미가와치 부산신사의 신이 된 조선여인노성환한국일본언어문화학회 · 일본언어문화2013 · 제24호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)

類義語「準備」と「用意」「支度」についての考察권기수pp. 5-25類義語「ぜひ」「きっと」「必ず」の意味機能の研究김창규pp. 27-39문화관련 홍보 텍스트의 번역전략 연구 -전문 번역사 심층인터뷰를 중심으로-김현정pp. 41-66前田本『日本書紀』한국 고유명의 声点에 대하여박미현pp. 67-81能動型「～テアル」構文と「～テオク」構文との比較分析(2) -複文構造をとる例文の特徴比較を中心に-배은정pp. 83-99
원문 보기