日本語複合動詞の用法に関する対照言語学的分析-「V＋こむ」の事例分析を中心に-
A contrastive linguistic analysis about the usage of Japanese compound verbs -a case study of「V＋komu」-
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Japanese has lots of compound verbs, which is more than 7 times compared to Korean one (cf. Lee1997:11). That’s one of the reasons why previous studies examined the correspondence between Japanese compound verbs and Korean expressions. Basically, all the existing studies focused on the dictionary meaning of Japanese compound verbs. Those studies gave just one meaning to one compound verb. At the same time, one Japanese compound verb could have only one corresponding Korean expression and construction. So those studies could not reflect the proper correspondence between Japanese compound verbs and Korean expressions. Also, previous studies compared Japanese books and its Korean translations. It could be useful, but Japanese expressions might have influence the way it is translated. So, in this study, Japanese translation and Korean translation of English books was examined. The part which Japanese compound verbs were used in was compared with its Korean counterpart. In chapter 3, ‘mochi-komu, hairi-komu, uri-komu, kumi-komu, omoi-komu’ was analyzed. It showed that its Korean counterparts are not restricted to just one expression or one construction. And, to suggest a new way to study the correspondence between Japanese compound verbs and Korean expressions, chapter 4 introduced ‘Idealized Cognitive Model.’ It is expected to help analysts to study the correspondence systematically.
Abstract
Japanese has lots of compound verbs, which is more than 7 times compared to Korean one (cf. Lee1997:11). That’s one of the reasons why previous studies examined the correspondence between Japanese compound verbs and Korean expressions. Basically, all the existing studies focused on the dictionary meaning of Japanese compound verbs. Those studies gave just one meaning to one compound verb. At the same time, one Japanese compound verb could have only one corresponding Korean expression and construction. So those studies could not reflect the proper correspondence between Japanese compound verbs and Korean expressions. Also, previous studies compared Japanese books and its Korean translations. It could be useful, but Japanese expressions might have influence the way it is translated. So, in this study, Japanese translation and Korean translation of English books was examined. The part which Japanese compound verbs were used in was compared with its Korean counterpart. In chapter 3, ‘mochi-komu, hairi-komu, uri-komu, kumi-komu, omoi-komu’ was analyzed. It showed that its Korean counterparts are not restricted to just one expression or one construction. And, to suggest a new way to study the correspondence between Japanese compound verbs and Korean expressions, chapter 4 introduced ‘Idealized Cognitive Model.’ It is expected to help analysts to study the correspondence systematically.
참고문헌 (14)
- 이경수, "한 · 일어복합동사의 대조분석", 일본어학연구, (10), pp.133~145 (2004), 한국일본어학회
- 池上嘉彦, "自然な日本語を教えるために—認知言語学をふまえて", pp.2~59 (2009), ひつじ書房
- 李相五, "韓·日における複合動詞の対照考察", 人文研究, 2, pp.1~26 (1982)
- 李相烈, "韓·日 複合動詞의 意味構造에 관한 硏究", 석사, 일어교육, pp.1996
- 李昌烈, "現代韓国語와 日本語의 複合動詞의 대조分析", 日本學報, 24(1), pp.101~123 (1990)
- 백종찬, "日本語の複合動詞と韓国語との対応関係", 일어일문학연구, 72(1), pp.179~195 (2010), 한국일어일문학회
- 森田良行, "動詞·形容詞·副詞の辞典", pp.18~52 (2008), 東京党出版
- 羅聖榮, "韓·日語 複合動詞의 類型分析", 日本學誌, 2-3, pp.133~166 (1982)
- 梁淳恵, "現代韓日両国語の対照比較(II)—複合動詞を中心にして", 日語日文学研究, 3, pp.63~76 (1982)
- 兪長玉, "日本語 複合動詞의 類型分析 —韓国語의 対応様相 中心으로—", 語文学研究, 6, pp.151~241 (1993)
- Lakoff, George, "Metaphors We Live", pp.4~47 (1980), University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, George, "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things", pp.68~76 (1987), University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, George, "Metaphor and Thought", pp.202~251 (1993), Cambridge University Press
- Longman, "Language Activator", F8~B11 (1993)