配慮表現としてのテミルと아/어 보다 ─ 待遇表現としてのテ形補助動詞における間主観性 ─
‘temiru’ and ‘a/eo boda’ as Consideration Expression ; -teform Auxiliary Verbs as Politeness on View of Intersubjectivity-
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Not only Japanese and Korean, most of all language has visional verb as a polysemantic verb and these languages seems to have common tendency, like have a meaning of ‘trial’ by modalverbslike use. However, it acts like a politeness in Korean. Seeing teform auxiliaries in Japanese and Korean on a view of each politeness ways, and reconsider the constructions of Japanese and Korean politeness and intersubjectivity. The most remarkable difference is the way of expression the relationship of speaker and hearer. In Korean, revealing familiarity using subjective face of ‘boda’ can leads intersubjectivity, because of its strict and concrete politeness constructions, focuses on users´ social positions. However, in Japanese, it can not expand to this way because its fuzzy and easychangeable relationship depends on the situation. Much more, it has preferred expressions far to near, low to high degree of intimacy to express polite manners. Even though, these days some brand new stream for politeness with a view of the degree of intimacy in Japan, and more useful and easy understandable substitute for traditional complicate styles of politeness in Japanese. It focuses not formal politeness by making the distance of participants clear, but casual politeness by making it vague and sometimes shorten with focusing intersubjectivity and appeal the participants as a community. Not completed as moderate polite manners still now, but teform auxiliary verbs in Japanese will have taken a part of casual style of politeness as a softened way to focus familiarity and intersubjectivity in brand new speech styles near future.
Abstract
Not only Japanese and Korean, most of all language has visional verb as a polysemantic verb and these languages seems to have common tendency, like have a meaning of ‘trial’ by modalverbslike use. However, it acts like a politeness in Korean. Seeing teform auxiliaries in Japanese and Korean on a view of each politeness ways, and reconsider the constructions of Japanese and Korean politeness and intersubjectivity. The most remarkable difference is the way of expression the relationship of speaker and hearer. In Korean, revealing familiarity using subjective face of ‘boda’ can leads intersubjectivity, because of its strict and concrete politeness constructions, focuses on users´ social positions. However, in Japanese, it can not expand to this way because its fuzzy and easychangeable relationship depends on the situation. Much more, it has preferred expressions far to near, low to high degree of intimacy to express polite manners. Even though, these days some brand new stream for politeness with a view of the degree of intimacy in Japan, and more useful and easy understandable substitute for traditional complicate styles of politeness in Japanese. It focuses not formal politeness by making the distance of participants clear, but casual politeness by making it vague and sometimes shorten with focusing intersubjectivity and appeal the participants as a community. Not completed as moderate polite manners still now, but teform auxiliary verbs in Japanese will have taken a part of casual style of politeness as a softened way to focus familiarity and intersubjectivity in brand new speech styles near future.
참고문헌 (16)
- 伊藤達也, "Voir と「見る」に於ける知覚動詞の多義に関与する異質的要因の研究(第二部)", 名古屋外国語大学紀要, 32, pp.157~170 (2007), 名古屋外国語大学外国語学部
- 北原賢一, "多義動詞の第一言語習得に関する認知論的考察―知覚動詞seeを例に", 麗澤レビュー, (19), pp.3~18 (2013), 麗澤大学英米文化研究会
- 滝浦真人, "日本の敬語論―ポライトネス理論からの再検討" (2005), 大修館書店
- 田中聡子, "動詞「みる」の多義構造", 言語研究, 110, pp.120~142 (1996), 日本言語学会
- 曹美庚, "日本語と韓国語における敬語表現の比較", 人間環境学研究, 2(1), pp.105~118 (2003), 広島修道大学人間環境学会
- 守屋三千代, "日本語の配慮表現―文法構造からのアプローチ", 日本語日本文学, (14), pp.A1~A16 (2004), 創価大学日本語日本文学会
- 守屋三千代, "日本語における<共同主観的>特徴と文法現象―認知言語学の観点より", 日本語日本文学, (18), pp.37~48 (2008), 創価大学日本語日本文学会
- 山岡政紀, "日本語における配慮表現研究の現状", 日本語日本文学, (14), pp.A17~A39 (2004), 創価大学日本語日本文学会
- 山崎雅人, "アルタイ諸語、朝鮮語と日本語における視覚動詞の試行相文法化的用法の展開", 言語処理学会第23回年次大会発表論文集, pp.70~73 (2017), 言語処理学会
- 辻幸夫, "認知言語学キーワード事典" (2002), 研究社
- 日本語教育学会, "日本語教育事典" (2006), 大修館書店
- 東野圭吾, "夢幻花" (2013), 株式会社PHP研究所
- 민경욱, "몽환화" (2005), 도서출판 비채
- 道尾秀介, "月と蟹" (2010), 株式会社文芸春秋
- 김은모, "달과 게" (2011), 북풀리오
- 森見登美彦, "夜行" (2016), 小学館
