正当化の観点から見るストラテジーの日韓比較 ― #MeTooに関するYouTubeのコメントを中心に ―
A Comparison of Strategies between Japan and Korea from Legitimation: Focus on YouTube Comments about #MeToo
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article clarifies what kind of legitimation strategies are used by Japanese and Korean people in YouTube comments regarding the #MeToo movement and gender awareness in Japan and Korea. Legitimation is based on several constructs: authorization, emotion, evaluation, speculation and estimation, quotation, definition, classification, comparison, and cooperation. This study reveals that evaluation, quotation, and classification strategies were used the most in both countries. However, several discrepancies were found in the results. First, in the case of evaluation, Japanese people tended to use only negative expressions, whereas Korean people tended to use both positive and negative ones. Moreover, in the case of quotation, Japanese people mostly referred to events relayed by the media, whereas Korean people also shared their own experiences. Interestingly, in the case of classification, Japanese people drew a clear distinction between a younger and an older generation, assessing the latter one negatively. Also, Japanese people’s lack of awareness about social issues was emphasized when compared to North American people. In opposition, Korean people distinguished victims from assailants, and victims expressed empathy by telling their own stories and regarding them as inner and outer. Lastly, Korean people were more prone to express their emotions compared to Japanese people. In conclusion, many negative aspects of the #MeToo movement were mentioned by Japanese people, however, there were not only negative one but also positive one which Korean people told their own experiences and show empathy despite the rate of using strategies was almost close. The reason of the result can be the huge influence of Japanese and Korean history, culture, and media.
Abstract
This article clarifies what kind of legitimation strategies are used by Japanese and Korean people in YouTube comments regarding the #MeToo movement and gender awareness in Japan and Korea. Legitimation is based on several constructs: authorization, emotion, evaluation, speculation and estimation, quotation, definition, classification, comparison, and cooperation. This study reveals that evaluation, quotation, and classification strategies were used the most in both countries. However, several discrepancies were found in the results. First, in the case of evaluation, Japanese people tended to use only negative expressions, whereas Korean people tended to use both positive and negative ones. Moreover, in the case of quotation, Japanese people mostly referred to events relayed by the media, whereas Korean people also shared their own experiences. Interestingly, in the case of classification, Japanese people drew a clear distinction between a younger and an older generation, assessing the latter one negatively. Also, Japanese people’s lack of awareness about social issues was emphasized when compared to North American people. In opposition, Korean people distinguished victims from assailants, and victims expressed empathy by telling their own stories and regarding them as inner and outer. Lastly, Korean people were more prone to express their emotions compared to Japanese people. In conclusion, many negative aspects of the #MeToo movement were mentioned by Japanese people, however, there were not only negative one but also positive one which Korean people told their own experiences and show empathy despite the rate of using strategies was almost close. The reason of the result can be the huge influence of Japanese and Korean history, culture, and media.
참고문헌 (13)
- ウンサ―シュッツ, "電子掲示板における"常識"への訴えの役割―正当化ストラテジーと"常識"の関係―", 立正大学心理学研究所紀要, 16, pp.23~36 (2008), 立正大学心理学研究所
- 大原志麻, "映像文化における日韓ジェンダー比較", アジア研究, 7, pp.41~60 (2012), 静岡大学人文学部アジア研究センター
- 韓娥凛, "日韓政治ディスコースにおける正当化ストラテジー－批判的談話分析による異文化間対照の試み－", 阪大日本語研究, 30, pp.41~69 (2018), 大阪大学大学院文学研究科日本語学講座
- Hashitani Moeka, "日本の政治ディスコースにおける 正当化ストラテジー －政治家のジェンダーに関する炎上発言を中心に－", 일본언어문화, (47), pp.51~69 (2019), 한국일본언어문화학회[DOI]
- Antonio Reyes, "Strategies of Legitimation in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions", The SAGE Social Science Collections, 22(6), pp.781~807 (2011)
- Patricia Bou-Franch, "Gender ideology and social identity processes in online language aggression against women", Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 2(2), pp.226~248 (2014)
- Christina Neumayer, "Which Alernative? A Critical Analysis of YouTube Comments in Anti-Fascist Protest", Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 10(1), pp.56~65 (2012)
- Eero Vaara, "Pulp and Paper Fiction : On the Discursive Legitimation of Grobal Industrial Restructuring", Organization Studies, 27(6), pp.789~810 (2006)
- Marta Dynel, "Swearing Methodologically : The(Im)Politeness of Expletives in Anonymous Commentaries on YouTube", The Journal of English Stadies, Universidad de La Rioja, 10, pp.25~50 (2012)
- Mark C. Suchman, "Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches", The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp.571~610 (1995)
- Patricia Bou-Franch, "Gender ideology and social identity processes in online language aggression againstwomen", Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, pp.226~248 (2014)
- Sabina Perrino, "Recontexualizing racialized stories on YouTube", Narrative Inquiry, 27(2), pp.261~285 (2017)
- Van Leeuwen, T., "Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis" (2008), Oxford University Press