日本語のYouTubeコメントに見られる正当化ストラテジー ― 「フェミニズム」に関する否定的なコメントを例に ―
Strategies of Legitimation in Japanese on YouTube Comments-Focus on Negative Comments about Feminism
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article tries to identify the reason why feminism in Japanese society is not active in terms of linguistics. Therefore, Japanese negative YouTube comments about feminism are analyzed from the perspective of legitimation to reveal the awareness of Japanese people. First, the results of codifying the comments os that there are 91% of negative comments, and also, the results of analyzing them in terms of legitimation is that classification is used the most, and quotation > evaluation > definition > emotion > speculation and estimation > example > authorization > cooperation = others are seen. Some awareness about feminism in Japanese society is confirmed from these result. First of all, there is the premise which is the reason why they are feminists is that they are not pretty and are not seen as sex objects. On the other hand, classification strategies which only a part of feminists(TwiFemi, radical feminists, etc) are criticized and, the past feminists are sympathized, however, modern feminists are not sympathized are found. Moreover, quotation strategies which not only the current situation in Japanese society but also the past such as the war era and school days are used to express the opposition to the needs of feminism. Furthermore, the premise in which feminists and females have the privilege because they are in a weak position and knew that are revealed with evaluating the character of feminists, definition, and example strategy. Also, in the case of speculation and estimation, the one claim which female are seen as sex objects because they makeup and dress up, therefore, this awareness affect to the disgust and victimblaming. Besides, through cooperation strategy, many opinions in which gender equality is impossible because there is the scientific basis of the difference between brain and body between males and females. These discussions are revealed in feminism researches, however, these are also found in YouTube comments from the perspective in linguistics in this research. It can be able to do the comparison research to other nations by using this legitimation forms.
Abstract
This article tries to identify the reason why feminism in Japanese society is not active in terms of linguistics. Therefore, Japanese negative YouTube comments about feminism are analyzed from the perspective of legitimation to reveal the awareness of Japanese people. First, the results of codifying the comments os that there are 91% of negative comments, and also, the results of analyzing them in terms of legitimation is that classification is used the most, and quotation > evaluation > definition > emotion > speculation and estimation > example > authorization > cooperation = others are seen. Some awareness about feminism in Japanese society is confirmed from these result. First of all, there is the premise which is the reason why they are feminists is that they are not pretty and are not seen as sex objects. On the other hand, classification strategies which only a part of feminists(TwiFemi, radical feminists, etc) are criticized and, the past feminists are sympathized, however, modern feminists are not sympathized are found. Moreover, quotation strategies which not only the current situation in Japanese society but also the past such as the war era and school days are used to express the opposition to the needs of feminism. Furthermore, the premise in which feminists and females have the privilege because they are in a weak position and knew that are revealed with evaluating the character of feminists, definition, and example strategy. Also, in the case of speculation and estimation, the one claim which female are seen as sex objects because they makeup and dress up, therefore, this awareness affect to the disgust and victimblaming. Besides, through cooperation strategy, many opinions in which gender equality is impossible because there is the scientific basis of the difference between brain and body between males and females. These discussions are revealed in feminism researches, however, these are also found in YouTube comments from the perspective in linguistics in this research. It can be able to do the comparison research to other nations by using this legitimation forms.
참고문헌 (25)
- 新井恭子, "説得力とは何か―広告表現におけることばの効果―", 経営論集, (69), pp.171~183 (2007), 東洋大学学術情報リポジトリ
- 李聖娥, "フェミニズムは誰のもの? ―女性嫌悪発言から見る現代韓国社会－", 早稲田社会科学総合研究. 別冊, 2015年度学生論文集, pp.57~67 (2015), 早稲田大学社会科学学会
- 원지은, "日韓の説得コミュニケーション研究の現状と課題", 일본문화연구, (38), pp.367~382 (2011), 동아시아일본학회[DOI]
- 원지은, "日韓の説得コミュニケーションの研究", 일본근대학연구, (52), pp.29~44 (2016), 한국일본근대학회[DOI]
- ウンサ―シュッツ・ジャカーラ, "電子掲示板における「常識」への訴えの役割―正当化ストラテジーと「常識」の関係―", 立正大学心理学研究所紀要, 16, pp.23~36 (2008), 立正大学心理学研究所
- 韓娥凛, "日韓政治ディスコースにおける正当化ストラテジー：批判的談話分析による異文化間対照の試み", 阪大日本語研究, 30, pp.41~69 (2018)
- 菊池夏野, "「女子力」とポストフェミニズムー大学生の「女子力」使用実態アンケート調査からー", 人間文化研究, (25), pp.18~48 (2016), 名古屋市立大学大学院人間文化研究科
- 菊池夏野, "日本のポストフェミニズム―「女子力」とネオリベラリズム", pp.80~81 (2019), 大月書店
- Hashitani Moeka, "正当化の観点から見るストラテジーの日韓比較 ― #MeTooに関するYouTubeのコメントを中心に ―", 日本語敎育, (91), pp.179~198 (2020), 한국일본어교육학회[DOI]
- Antonio Reyes, "Strategies of Legitimation in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions", Discourse & Society, 22(6), pp.781~807 (2011), The SAGE Social Science Collections
- Camelia-Mihaela Cmeciu, "Online Discursive (De)legitimation of the Roma Community", Journal of Media Research, 24, pp.80~98 (2016)
- Patricia Bou-Franch, "Gender ideology and social identity processes in online language aggression against women", Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 2(2), pp.226~248 (2014), Oxford University Press
- Maria Joutsenvirta, "Discursive (de)legitimation of a contested Finnish greenfield investment project in Latin America", Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25, pp.85~96 (2009)
- Mark C. Suchman, "Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches", The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp.571~610 (1995)
- Van Leeuwen, T., "Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford Studies in sociolinguistics" (2008), Oxford University Press
- "体毛の歴史から考える、女性らしさとフェミニズム" (2020)[URL]
- "加藤純一、フェミニストを再び論破してしまう" (2020)[URL]
- "『フェミニスト』の皆さん、勉強しなさい＜現在削除されている＞", ~ (2020)
- "自称フェミニストが害悪すぎる件について" (2020)[URL]
- "フェミニズムってなんか怖い？と思っているあなたに届け" (2020)[URL]
- "【フェミニズムと北条政子】おはようバーチャルおばあちゃん【2020年2月9日号】" (2020)[URL]
- "【テキサス親父】韓国のフェミニズムが米国を超える" (2020)[URL]
- "女性専用車両は馬鹿げてる？英国、フェミニストや政治家が批判" (2020)[URL]
- "が韓国女性について話さない理由とは？韓国の男女の葛藤？フェミニズム？＜現在削除されている＞", ~ (2020)
- "『フェミニストからのメッセージ』予告編-Netflix" (2020)[URL]