「残る・残す」と「남다・남기다」の日韓対照研究
A Contrastive Study on Japanese Verbs ‘nokoru (残る)・nokosu (残す)’ and Korean Verbs ‘namda (남다)・namgida (남기다)’
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper presents an investigation into the Japanese verbs ‘nokoru (残る)・nokosu (残す)’ and their Korean counterparts ‘namda (남다)・namgida (남기다)’ from the perspective of contrastive linguistics. The study provides three major results that have not been stated in previous studies: ⅰ)Basically, intransitive verbs ‘nokoru (残る) vs namda (남다)’ and transitive verbs ‘nokosu (残す) vs namgida (남기다)’ make two verb pairs that share many common features in a semantic way. They are in contrast to the pair ‘kiru (切る) vs jaleuda (자르다)’ that have more differences than similarities between them. ⅱ) ‘sala namda (살아 남다)’ was analyzed as a type with an intervening element and distinguished from ‘～nokoru (残る)’ that belongs to the type of no intervening elements like ‘ikinokoru (生き残る)’. This approach offers some proper explanations about differences such as the separation of a boundary between them. ⅲ) ‘～nokosu (残す)’ belongs to the type of no intervening elements that has three uses according to 1) whether the act of V1 is complete, 2) whether the act of V1 is suspended or did not occur at all, and 3) whether the survival of an outcome is visible or not. Korean translations corresponding to each of these uses are realized differently.
Abstract
This paper presents an investigation into the Japanese verbs ‘nokoru (残る)・nokosu (残す)’ and their Korean counterparts ‘namda (남다)・namgida (남기다)’ from the perspective of contrastive linguistics. The study provides three major results that have not been stated in previous studies: ⅰ)Basically, intransitive verbs ‘nokoru (残る) vs namda (남다)’ and transitive verbs ‘nokosu (残す) vs namgida (남기다)’ make two verb pairs that share many common features in a semantic way. They are in contrast to the pair ‘kiru (切る) vs jaleuda (자르다)’ that have more differences than similarities between them. ⅱ) ‘sala namda (살아 남다)’ was analyzed as a type with an intervening element and distinguished from ‘～nokoru (残る)’ that belongs to the type of no intervening elements like ‘ikinokoru (生き残る)’. This approach offers some proper explanations about differences such as the separation of a boundary between them. ⅲ) ‘～nokosu (残す)’ belongs to the type of no intervening elements that has three uses according to 1) whether the act of V1 is complete, 2) whether the act of V1 is suspended or did not occur at all, and 3) whether the survival of an outcome is visible or not. Korean translations corresponding to each of these uses are realized differently.
참고문헌 (64)
- 金鎰炳, "국어 합성어 연구", pp.96~102 (2000), 도서출판 역락
- 金倉燮, "現代国語의 複合動詞 研究", 国語研究, 47, pp.1~98 (1981), 国語研究会
- 서정수, "국어 문법의 연구 Ⅱ", pp.59~94 (1992), 한국문화사
- 이양혜, "‘먹다’의 기능과 의미 변화", 한국어학, 15, pp.9~210 (2002), 한국어학회
- 李翊燮, "국어문법론강의", pp.69~71 (2001), 학연사
- 이충규, "日韓語の動詞結合の対照研究 ―「食べる／먹다」をV2とする例を中心に―", 日本文化學報, (41), pp.17~38 (2009), 한국일본문화학회[DOI]
- 이충규, "形態レベルからみた日韓語の動詞結合 -「連用形」「語基」「語幹」を適用した形態構造分析 -", 日本語文學, 1(43), pp.89~117 (2009), 한국일본어문학회
- 이충규, "介在要素有りタイプの動詞結合の下位分類 - 「가다」をV2とする例を中心に -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(39), pp.277~297 (2014), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- 이충규, "「죽다」と「死ぬ」との対照研究", 日本文化學報, (71), pp.97~116 (2016), 한국일본문화학회[DOI]
- 이충규, "韓国人のための複合動詞データベース -現状報告と有効性の検討-", 日本語文學, 1(75), pp.149~167 (2017), 한국일본어문학회[DOI]
- 이충규, "切断動詞「切る」と「자르다」の対照研究", 일어일문학, (77), pp.193~210 (2018), 대한일어일문학회[DOI]
- 이충규, "「捨てる」と「버리다」との対照研究", 일본근대학연구, (61), pp.29~48 (2018), 한국일본근대학회[DOI]
- 이충규, "格パターンによる「～込む」の下位分類 ― 韓国人学習者を念頭に置いた試み ―", 日本文化學報, (83), pp.177~199 (2019), 한국일본문화학회[DOI]
- 이충규, "「抜く」と「뽑다」の日韓対照研究", 日本語文學, 1(83), pp.67~93 (2019), 한국일본어문학회[DOI]
- 影山太郎, "文法と語形成", pp.74~177 (1993), ひつじ書房
- 影山太郎, "複合動詞研究の最先端：謎の解明に向けて", pp.3~46 (2013), ひつじ書房
- 加藤重広, "日本語文法入門ハンドブック", pp.27~ (2006), 研究社
- 김옥영, "잔여의 의미를 나타내는 남다의 의미 분석 및 이에 대응하는 일본어와의 대조", 한국민족문화, (28), pp.415~435 (2006), 한국민족문화연구소
- 杉村泰, "コーパスを利用した複合動詞｢－残す｣の意味分析", 名古屋大学言語文化論集, 30(1), pp.47~60 (2008), 名古屋大学大学院国際言語文化研究科
- 杉村泰, "コーパスを利用した複合動詞｢－残る｣の意味分析", 名古屋大学言語文化論集, 30(2), pp.171~180 (2009), 名古屋大学大学院国際言語文化研究科
- 塚本秀樹, "対照言語学の新展開", pp.297~317 (2004), ひつじ書房
- 野村雅昭, "複合動詞資料集", pp.147~ (1987), 国立国語研究所
- 小泉保, "日本語基本動詞用法辞典" (1989), 大修館書店
- "複合動詞レキシコン"[URL]
- 田忠魁, "類義語使い分け辞典" (1998), 研究社
- 松井栄一, "ちがいがわかる類語使い分け辞典" (2008), 小学館
- 森田良行, "基礎日本語辞典" (2007), 角川学芸出版
- 森山新, "日本語多義語学習辞典動詞編" (2012), アルク
- "고려대 한국어대사전" (2009)[URL]
- "엣센스 국어사전" (1996)
- 민중서림, "연세 한국어사전" (1998)
- "표준국어대사전" (1999)[URL]
- "岩波国語辞典" (2000), 岩波書店
- "広辞苑第六版日韓辞典" (2012), 어문학사
- "集英社国語辞典" (1993), 集英社
- "新明解国語辞典" (1997), 三省堂
- "大辞林", 小学館
- "使い方の分かる類語例解辞典", 小学館
- "明鏡国語辞典" (2003), 大修館書店
- "新韓日辞典(例解)" (1996), 민중서림
- "엣센스 韓日辞典" (2006), 민중서림
- "프라임 한일사전" (2009), 두산동아
- "朝鮮語辞典" (2005), 小学館
- "엘리트 일한사전" (1993), YBM 시사영어사
- "엣센스 日韓辞典" (2006), 민중서림
- "프라임 일한사전" (2005), 두산동아
- "경기신문"[URL]
- "뉴스엔미디어"[URL]
- "머니투데이"[URL]
- "매일신문"[URL]
- "서울경제"[URL]
- "셀주크 투르크와 전쟁 ②"[URL]
- "신경림의 시｢또 한 번 겨울을 보낸 자들은｣", ~
- "SBS 뉴스"[URL]
- "MBC NEWS"[URL]
- "OBS NEWS"[URL]
- "이투뉴스"[URL]
- "중도일보"[URL]
- "충청남도의회 교육사회위원회 회의록"[URL]
- "한라일보"[URL]
- "掃除ロボット｢ルンバ(Roomba)｣"[URL]
- "今日はＩＭさんのサポート内容の記録です"[URL]
- "鴻上尚史の新作｢サバイバーズ・ギルト＆シェイム｣に舞台初主演の山本涼介"[URL]
- "松本学の野党ウオッチ"[URL]