피드백 항목에 따른 일한 번역 피드백 고찰 ― 교수자와 졸업생 평가를 중심으로 ―
Contemplation on Japanese to Korean Translation Feedback According to Feedback Category: Focused on the Evaluation of Trainers and Graduates
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Professor’s feedback is extremely important in translation assignments. A text can be translated into different texts using various different expressions, therefore it could be said that there is no single absolute answer. However, different translations can also result from misunderstandings of the original text or from the use of expressions that turn out to be awkward in the target text. The quality of translation is very important, as it is to be delivered to clients, and quality is determined not only by the translation’s content and the expressions employed within, but also by spelling and compliance to transcriptional method. Therefore, the review and correction of translation assignments by professors, in terms of content and quality, is essential for translation learners. This study looks into the method of evaluating translations with set feedback categories and feedback method for reviewing and correcting translations. It contemplates the pros and cons, as well as objectivity, based on the feedback matching ratio of a translation assignment that has been evaluated by different professors according to set feedback category. The feedback categories have been modified 3 times based on precedent research. The method of feedback has also been modified 3 times through experiments with the purpose of looking for improvement points.
Abstract
Professor’s feedback is extremely important in translation assignments. A text can be translated into different texts using various different expressions, therefore it could be said that there is no single absolute answer. However, different translations can also result from misunderstandings of the original text or from the use of expressions that turn out to be awkward in the target text. The quality of translation is very important, as it is to be delivered to clients, and quality is determined not only by the translation’s content and the expressions employed within, but also by spelling and compliance to transcriptional method. Therefore, the review and correction of translation assignments by professors, in terms of content and quality, is essential for translation learners. This study looks into the method of evaluating translations with set feedback categories and feedback method for reviewing and correcting translations. It contemplates the pros and cons, as well as objectivity, based on the feedback matching ratio of a translation assignment that has been evaluated by different professors according to set feedback category. The feedback categories have been modified 3 times based on precedent research. The method of feedback has also been modified 3 times through experiments with the purpose of looking for improvement points.
참고문헌 (16)
- 김대영, "학부과정 번역 수업에서의 효율적인 피드백 방식 고찰", 한국프랑스어문교육학회 학술대회자료집, pp.115~155 (2016), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
- 김도훈, "번역 교육에 있어서의 서면교정피드백에 대한 연구", 언어학연구, 22(1), pp.1~16 (2017), 한국언어연구학회[DOI]
- 김련희, "번역교육현장에서의 번역물 평가에 대한 제언", 人文科學硏究, 13, pp.79~98 (2007), 동덕여자대학교인문과학연구소
- 김혜영, "번역교육에서의 동료 평가 및 동료 감수의 효과", 통역과 번역, 11(2), pp.39~63 (2009), 한국통역번역학회
- 박선희, "번역평가표를 활용한 학부 번역수업 설계", 프랑스어문교육, (55), pp.87~115 (2016), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
- 성초림, "번역 교육 현장에서의 번역물 품질 평가『한국외대 통역번역대학원 교강사 설문을중심으로』", 번역학연구, 2(2), pp.37~56 (2001), 한국번역학회
- 신지선, "번역교육시 번역평가모델 활용의 필요성 고찰", 번역학연구, 11(3), pp.121~142 (2010), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 오미형, "교수자 가이드에 기반한 자기수정 사례연구", 통번역학연구, 19(4), pp.45~72 (2015), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 이미경, "학부과정 번역수업에서의 피드백 방법에 따른 효과 및 학습자의 피드백 인식 비교", 번역학연구, 12(3), pp.141~168 (2011), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이주리애, "엑셀을 활용한 번역 과제용 양식 연구", 번역학연구, 21(1), pp.159~188 (2020), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 장혜선, "목적별 번역 평가 모델에 관한 小考 － 국내외 번역품질평가(TQA) 분석을 중심으로 －", 외국어교육연구, 25(1), pp.107~136 (2011), 외국어교육연구소[DOI]
- 조수연, "피드백 커뮤니케이션에 대한 학습자 인식 통번역대학원 번역수업 수강생 대상 설문조사 연구", 통번역학연구, 18(4), pp.247~273 (2014), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 최효은, "한영 특허번역의 품질평가 기준 및 규범에 대한 연구", 번역학연구, 17(2), pp.213~250 (2016), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- ケビン·モリセイ, "技術翻訳のチェックポイント-技術英文の作成と評価(2015年第6刷）", pp.150~151 (2005), 丸善出版
- 豊島知穂, "校閲カテゴリ体系に基づく翻訳学習者の誤り傾向の分析", 通訳翻訳研究への招待, 16, pp.47~65 (2016), 日本通訳翻訳学会
- Ellis, R., "A typology of written corrective feedback types", ELT journal, 63(2), pp.97~107 (2009)