日本語教育における授業改善のための工夫 ― アクティブ･ラーニング型授業(Active Learningbased instruction：AL)の質の向上を中心に ―
Strategies for Improving Classes in Japanese Language Education: Focusing on Improving the Quality of Active Learningbased instruction(AL:ALtype class)
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, the important point of learnercentered education is the introduction and operation of a new teaching and learning method, that is, Active Learningbased instruction (AL:ALtype class). As a part of the ALtype class practice strategy, I tried to concretely implement Collaborative learning in the subject of <Communication 日本語>. And as an ALtype class, it was possible to describe the procedure of Flipped Learning. As a result, in the course of the ALtype class, a Rubric evaluation and Reflection/SRN course were required, and an example of a rubric for evaluating the subject was able to be proposed.Through such analysis and instructional practices, the quality of ALtype class is expected to improve. In addition, in implementing the <ALtype class>, it is necessary to examine the improvement of the class according to the characteristics of the subject, the affective characteristics and needs of the learners. For example, it reflects the results of the Learning Strategy Test (MLST) provided by the Center for Teaching & Learning (CTL). Teaching the learners according to their characteristics will be helpful in practicing ALtype classes. This remains a task for future research.
Abstract
In this study, the important point of learnercentered education is the introduction and operation of a new teaching and learning method, that is, Active Learningbased instruction (AL:ALtype class). As a part of the ALtype class practice strategy, I tried to concretely implement Collaborative learning in the subject of <Communication 日本語>. And as an ALtype class, it was possible to describe the procedure of Flipped Learning. As a result, in the course of the ALtype class, a Rubric evaluation and Reflection/SRN course were required, and an example of a rubric for evaluating the subject was able to be proposed.Through such analysis and instructional practices, the quality of ALtype class is expected to improve. In addition, in implementing the <ALtype class>, it is necessary to examine the improvement of the class according to the characteristics of the subject, the affective characteristics and needs of the learners. For example, it reflects the results of the Learning Strategy Test (MLST) provided by the Center for Teaching & Learning (CTL). Teaching the learners according to their characteristics will be helpful in practicing ALtype classes. This remains a task for future research.
참고문헌 (36)
- 고혜정, "플립 러닝의 도입이 학습 효과에 미치는 영향─ 대학 교양일본어의 전통적인 수업과의 비교를 통해서 ─", 日本語敎育, (81), pp.1~15 (2017), 한국일본어교육학회[DOI]
- 김지선, "ピア․ラーニングの協働的な学びに関する一考察 - 学習者の内省に基づいて -", 일본학보, (101), pp.17~32 (2014), 한국일본학회
- 김지선, "블렌디드 러닝에서의 내성활동에 관한 실천보고 - 사이버 캠퍼스를 활용한 학습자간 내성공유와 메타내성 -", 일본어교육연구, (37), pp.29~47 (2016), 한국일어교육학회
- 방극철, "대학 교양 일본어 학습자의 정의적 특성 분석 - 새로운 일본어 교육 방법론을 위한 탐색적 시도 -", 비교일본학, 38, pp.249~266 (2016), 일본학국제비교연구소
- 방극철, "SRN(Self Reflection Note)을 활용한 전공 일본어교육─ 비즈니스 일본어 수업 사례를 중심으로 ─", 日本語敎育, (82), pp.19~38 (2017), 한국일본어교육학회[DOI]
- 방극철, "일본어 교육에서 액티브러닝(Active Learning: AL) 수업의 도입과 전략- 비즈니스 일본어 수업 사례를 중심으로 -", 비교일본학, 50, pp.279~304 (2020), 일본학국제비교연구소
- 백이연, "ブラックボードを活用した協働学習の実践", 일본어교육연구, (38), pp.95~111 (2017), 한국일어교육학회[DOI]
- 신은진, "ブレンデッドラーニング授業の設計と運営 -「メディア日本語」の実践を通して-", 일본어교육연구, (37), pp.119~138 (2016), 한국일어교육학회
- 이선희, "블렌디드 러닝을 적용한 ‘기초일본어1’ 수업", 일본근대학연구, (51), pp.129~144 (2016), 한국일본근대학회[DOI]
- 이현진, "読解授業におけるピア․リーディングの実際と効果 - 相互作用分析(IPA)による話し合いプロセス分析を通じて -", 일본학보, (101), pp.59~73 (2014), 한국일본학회
- 조대하, "PBL 기반 일본어 ‘교과교재연구 및 지도법’ 수업사례 연구", 일본어교육연구, (38), pp.149~166 (2017), 한국일어교육학회[DOI]
- 조선영, "一般大学におけるオンライン授業の実践報告 -学習者の満足度調査を中心に-", 일본어교육연구, (32), pp.191~209 (2015), 한국일어교육학회
- 채경희, "ブレンディッドラーニングを活用した日本語教育-韓国の日本語授業の現況報告をめぐって-", 일본어교육연구, (28), pp.129~143 (2014), 한국일어교육학회
- 채경희, "블렌디드 일본어교육현장에서의 교수자의 역할", 일본어교육연구, (32), pp.227~239 (2015), 한국일어교육학회
- 최욱, "모든 학교를 위한 플립드 러닝 가이드 북 설계,개발,실행,평가", pp.94~ (2020), 교육과학사
- 安永悟, "アクティブラーニングの技法･授業デザイン", pp.34~35 (2016), 東信堂
- 다마오까 요시꼬, "読解授業におけるピア‧リーディングの試み -大学の初級日本語学習者を対象に-", 일본어학연구, (32), pp.51~67 (2011), 한국일본어학회
- 倉持香, "韓国における日本語協働学習の課題 -研究の実態と学習者意識調査を中心に-", 일본어학연구, (32), pp.33~50 (2011), 한국일본어학회
- 쿠라모찌카오루, "内省活動から見た学習者の情意面と教師の役割 －韓国の大学の教養科目における初級日本語学習者を中心に－", 일본언어문화, (27), pp.95~116 (2014), 한국일본언어문화학회[DOI]
- Kobayashi, Akiko, "中上級日本語クラスにおける Problem-based Learningの試み : 学習者の動機づけに着目して", 일본어교육연구, (51), pp.41~57 (2020), 한국일어교육학회[DOI]
- 사이토 아케미, "日本語教育におけるグループ学習の導入について-学生の作文とアンケート調査の結果を中心に-", 일본어학연구, (41), pp.83~100 (2014), 한국일본어학회
- 手塚まゆ子, "反転授業における相互作用のある対話の分析 -日本語上級クラスの文法科目を対象に-", 일본어교육연구, (49), pp.39~54 (2019), 한국일어교육학회[DOI]
- 中嶋洋一責任, "プロ教師 に学ぶ真のアクティブ・ラーニング ＂脳動＂的な英語学習のすすめ", pp.20~23 (2017), 開隆堂
- 中沢紀子, "交換留学生の大学生活と日本語使用について", 日本語敎育, (88), pp.17~26 (2019), 한국일본어교육학회[DOI]
- Honda Miho, "教養日本語における学習者の期待要素 -母語話者教師と非母語話者教師を対象として-", 일본어교육연구, (37), pp.177~196 (2016), 한국일어교육학회
- 溝上慎一, "アクティブラーニングと教授学習パラダイムの転換", pp.17~20 (2014), 東信堂
- 溝上慎一, "アクティブラーニングとしてのPBLと探究的な学習", pp.7~ (2016), 東信堂
- 長澤多代, "アクティブラーニングとしてのPBLと探究的な学習", pp.24~45 (2016), 東信堂
- 横溝紳一郎, "日本語教師のためのアクティブ・ラーニング", pp.7~ (2019), くろしお出版
- 中央教育審議会教育課程部会, "次期学習指導要領等に向けたこれまでの審議のまとめ", 7~13 (2016)
- 文部科学省, "中学校学習指導要領(平成29年度告示)解説総合的な学習の時間編", pp.107~108 (2017), 東山書房
- 山地弘起, "大学教育と情報", pp.3~ (2014), 私立大学情報教育協会
- 脇田里子, "ルーブリックによる日本語ライティングのアセスメント", 専門日本語教育学会研究討論会誌, 21, pp.36~37 (2019), 下関市立大学
- 하야시 토모코, "日本語教育研究の現状と展望", 일본어학연구, (51), pp.67~77 (2017), 한국일본어학회
- "2019年 教育基本統計, 教育部", 韓国教育開発院, ~
- Elizabeth F. Barkley, "学習評価ハンドブック アクティブラーニングを促す50の技法", pp.3~40 (2020), 東京大學出版會