단군조선 관련 在野文獻에 대한 남⋅북한 연구 성과의 현 단계

Abstract

There are several types of unauthorised history books related to the Dangun Joseon Dynasty. Of these, quite a few a fake books are clearly identified. However, there was a corner of the book, ‘Kyuewon Sahwa’ which was difficult to conclude with a fake book. Therefore, he carefully examined the grounds that the book is a fake book. Especially, the use of the term '文化.' As a result, it seems reasonable to point out '文化' as the traditional use of '文治敎化' rather than as the translation of the modern term 'Culture'. And Dangun's record of supporting water management for Chinese Yao(堯) wages was found in Hulbert's article in 1901 in the monthly 'Korea Review,' written in English. The content is not the same as the technology in the overnight civilization, but the plot is roughly aligned. Thus, unauthorised history books such as 'Kyuwon Sahwa' give rise to the possibility that the books were not made by imagination but by reference. This contradicts the claim that ‘Kyuewon Sahwa’ is a fake book from the 1910s. Of course, we should consider the possibility that Hulbert's 'Korean History' influenced unauthorised history books since 1905. But since Hulbert was deported in 1907, it may have been difficult for him to spread his English-written book. Moreover, it is hard to imagine that those who can write history books without authority had the ability to master English writings. Therefore, the relationship of influence between the two is regarded as an unrealistic inference. However, it was not the conclusion that the ‘Kyuewon Sahwa’ hypocrisy was fictitious. There were no direct documents related to the Dangun vessel. In this context, the selective acceptance of the 'standardization' of North Korean academia was interpreted as a product of an inevitable way of expanding the use of feed. Recognition about the history of the Dangun dynasty is a major part of 'Kyuewon Sahwa'. More and more, a cool approach to 'nuclearization of normality' should be provided. In addition, active communication between South and North Korean scholars is more important.