혁신활동 결과의 전유방법에서 특허와 영업비밀의 상대적 선호
The Relative Preference of Patent and Secrecy for Appropriation Mechanisms
2
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
혁신활동은 기업 및 국가의 지속적인 성장에 중요한 요인으로 작용하고 있으며 특히 혁신활동 결과물의 전유문제가 지속적인 혁신활동을 보장하는 중요한 수단으로 작용하고 있다. 본 연구는 혁신활동 결과물의 전유방법으로써 대표적으로 대비되는 특허시스템과 영업비밀에 대한 상대적 선호에 혁신주체와 혁신결과물의 특성들이 미치는 영향을 ‘2005년 기술혁신조사: 제조업부분’ 자료와 Ordered Logit 방법을 통해 실증분석하였다. 분석결과 공정혁신활동보다는 제품혁신활동에서 선호도에 미치는 영향이 뚜렷한 것으로 나타났다. 또한 대부분의 연구주제에서 본 연구는 기존의 연구 및 전유방법들에서처럼 본연의 특성과 일치하는 결과를 나타냈으나 혁신활동의 정보원천과 관련된 분석결과에서는 기존의 연구와 상당한 차이점이 나타났다. 이는 본 연구가 기존의 연구에 비해 최신의 자료를 이용함으로써 기존연구와의 차별성을 분석해낸 결과로 볼 수 있을 것이다.
Abstract
The innovation activity is an important factor for sustained growth in nations and firms. Particularly, the problem of appropriation of results of the innovative activity is very important for innovators since it enables them to enjoy the profits generated by their innovations. This study is intended to empirically analyse relative preference of patent and secrecy that is affected by characteristics of innovators and results of innovation using data from ‘2005: The Korean Innovation Survey’ and Ordered Logit method. As a result of this study, the preference for a specific mechanism is clearly revealed in product innovation rather than process innovation. Also, in most research, questions results of analysis are equal to the previous studies and the nature of appropriation methods. However, the result of a research question based on sources of information is very different from previous researches. This study utilized more recent data than previous studies. This result reflects that existing patterns have been changed during recent period.
참고문헌 (32)
- 과학기술정책연구원, "2005년도 한국의기술혁신조사: 제조업부문", 조사연구 2005-05, ~ (2005)
- 김학수, "연구개발투자에 대한 조세지원제도의 효과 분석", 한국경제연구원, 7(4) (2007)
- 이성우, "로짓․프로빗모형 응용" (2005), 박영사
- 특허청, "영업비밀 보호 가이드북", 특허청, ~ (2004)
- 특허청, "지식재산통계 연보", 특허청, ~ (2008)
- OECD, "Proposal Guideline for Measuring and Interpreting Technology Innovation Data-The Oslo Manual", OECD, ~, pp.Third Edition (2005)
- Arrow,K, "Economic Welfare and The Allocation of Resources for Invention in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity", pp.609~625 (1962), Princeton University Press
- Arundel,A, "The Relative Effectiveness of Patents and Secrecy for Appropriation", Research Policy, 30, pp.611~624 (2001)
- Arundel, A, "What Percentage of Innovative Activity is Patented?", Research Policy, 27, pp.127~141 (1998)
- Blind, K, "Motives to Patent: Empirical Evidence from Germany", Research Policy, 35, pp.655~672 (2006)
- Brouwer, E, "Innovative Output, and A Firm Propensity to Patent. An Exploration of CIS Micro Data", Research Policy, 28, pp.615~624 (1999)
- Bughin, J, "Managerial Efficiency and The Schumpeterian Link Between Size, Market Structure and Innovation Revisited", Research Policy, 23(6), pp.653~659 (1994)
- Cohen, W. M, "The Tradeoff Between Firm Size and Diversity in Pursuit of Technological Progress", Small Business Economics, 4, pp.1~14 (1992)
- Cohen, W. M, "Appropriability Conditions and Why Firms Patent and Why They Do Not in the American Manufacturing Sector" (1998), Carnegie Mellon University
- Dyerson, R, "Learning, Teamwork and Appropriability: Managing Technological Change in The Department of Social Security", Journal of Management Studies, 36(5), pp.629~652 (1999)
- Harter,J.F.R, "The Propensity to Patent with Differentiated Products", Southern Economic Journal, 61, pp.195~200 (1993)
- Horstmann, I, "Patents as Information Transfer Mechanisms: to Patent or (maybe) Not to Patent", Journal of Political Economy, 93, pp.837~858 (1985)
- Hurmelinna, P, "The Janus Face of the Appropriability Regime in the Protection of Innovations: Theoretical Re-appraisal and Empirical Analysis" (2007), Technovation
- Kingston,W, "Innovation Needs Patents Reform", Research Policy, 30, pp.403~423 (2001)
- Klepper,S, "Entry, Exit, Growth and Innovation Over the Product Life Cycle", American Economic Review, 86, pp.562~583 (1996)
- Kortum, S, "What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?", Research Policy, 28, pp.1~22 (1999)
- Levin, R. C, "Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development", Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 3, pp.783~820 (1987)
- Mansfield,E, "Patents and Innovations: an Empirical Study", Management Science, 32(2), pp.173~181 (1986)
- Mazzoleni, R, "The Benefits and Costs of Strong Patent Protection: a Contribution to the Current Debate", Research Policy, 27, pp.273~284 (1998)
- Norman,P.M, "Protecting Knowledge in Strategic Alliances: Resource and Relational Characteristics", The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13, pp.177~202 (2002)
- Pindych, R. S, "Microeconomics(5th ed.)" (2001), Prentice Hall
- Rauch,L, "Estimates from the Manufacturer’s Innovations Survey Pilot" (1995), National Science Foundation
- Scherer, F. M, "Patents and the Corporation: a Report on Industrial Technology Under Changing Public Policy" (1959), Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration, 2nd Edn
- Schumpeter,J, "Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy" (1942), Harper and Row
- Scotchmer,S.,J.Green, "Novelty and Disclosure in Patent Law", RAND Journal of Economics, 21, pp.131~146 (1990)
- Teece,D, "Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy in The Competitive Challenge", pp.185~219 (1987), Ballinger Publishing
- Teece,D, "Capturing Value from Technological Innovation: Integration, Strategic Partnering and Licensing Decisions", Interfaces, 18(3) (1998)