R.O.K Minilateral Engagement with ASEAN: Assessment of BIMP-EAGA
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The ASEAN and ROK have played a crucial role in fostering regional peace and economic development. Nevertheless, the recent strategic competition between the US and China has turned the region into a contested arena. The relationship faces challenges due to the ROK's growing alignment with the US, prompting a rising interest in minilateralism as an alternative collaboration model. This paper scrutinizes the impact of ROK's foreign policy behavior, with a focus on minilateralism as a preferred cooperation model with ASEAN. The study centers on BIMP-EAGA, investigating its effectiveness in sustaining collaboration amid geopolitical rivalry. The paper concludes that BIMP-EAGA, as a manifestation of minilateralism, serves as an alternative platform for ROK and ASEAN cooperation. However, the study reveals that the implementation of BIMP-EAGA falls short of expectations. This paper emphasizes the need for greater subregional focus and comprehensive coverage of BIMP-EAGA to truly reflect the shared interests of ASEAN member states.
Abstract
The ASEAN and ROK have played a crucial role in fostering regional peace and economic development. Nevertheless, the recent strategic competition between the US and China has turned the region into a contested arena. The relationship faces challenges due to the ROK's growing alignment with the US, prompting a rising interest in minilateralism as an alternative collaboration model. This paper scrutinizes the impact of ROK's foreign policy behavior, with a focus on minilateralism as a preferred cooperation model with ASEAN. The study centers on BIMP-EAGA, investigating its effectiveness in sustaining collaboration amid geopolitical rivalry. The paper concludes that BIMP-EAGA, as a manifestation of minilateralism, serves as an alternative platform for ROK and ASEAN cooperation. However, the study reveals that the implementation of BIMP-EAGA falls short of expectations. This paper emphasizes the need for greater subregional focus and comprehensive coverage of BIMP-EAGA to truly reflect the shared interests of ASEAN member states.
참고문헌 (39)
- Acharya, A, "The end of American world order" (2018), Polity Press
- Minilateralism for multilateralism in the post COVID age (RSIS Policy Report), "Anuar, A.", Nanyang Technological University, ~ (2021)
- Anugrah, R. S., "Dampak Kerjasama Brunei Indonesia Malaysia Filipina East Asean Growth Area(BIMP-EAGA)Terhadap Ekonomi Indonesia", Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional Fajar, 1(2), pp.1~13 (2023)
- "First Batch of BIMP-EAGA Projects Approved for Korean Funding" (2022)[URL]
- "BKCF Projects" (2023)[URL]
- "Priority Areas" (2023)[URL]
- "May 7. Kishida and Yoon tout “new departure” for South Korea-Japan ties" (2023)[URL]
- "Private sector crucial to roll out $32.8-B project in BIMP-EAGA" (2023)[URL]
- Dent, C., "Sub-Regional Cooperation and Developmental Regionalism: The Case of BIMP-EAGA", Contemporary Southeast Asia, 33(1), pp.1~29 (2011)
- Evangelista, R. G, "Experiences in the Establishment and Operation of the Brunei Darussalam-Indonesia-Malaysia-Philippines-East ASEAN Growth Area (BIMP-EAGA) Initiative", Asia-Pacific De velopment Journal, 7(1), pp.61~89 (2000)
- Falkner, R, "A Minilateral Solution for Global Climate Change? On Bargaining Efficiency, Club Benefits, and International Legitimacy", Perspectives on Politics, 14(1), pp.87~101 (2016)
- Green, M. J., "The Oxford Handbook of the International Relations of Asia" (2014), Oxford University Press
- Gu, B. K, "Institutionalization Process and Implications of ASEAN Subregions: The case of BIMP-EAGA", The Journal of Asian Studies, 25(2), pp.185~208 (2022)
- Ha, H. T, "Understanding the Institutional Challenge of Indo-Pacific Minilaterals to ASEAN", Contemporary Southeast Asia, 44(1), pp.1~30 (2023)
- "Minister outlines three measures for expediting BIMP-EAGA cooperation" (2022)[URL]
- "ASEAN needs to move to minilateralism" (2017)[URL]
- "Korea’s Cooperation with ASEAN and the Brunei Darussalam-Indonesia-Malaysia-Philippines East ASEAN Growth Area (BIMP-EAGA) Republic of Korea (ROK) Cooperation Fund (BKCF)" (2023)[URL]
- "Yoon’s Realignment with the US: Will ASEAN be Relevant for ROK? FULCRUM" (2023)[URL]
- "Minister confirms South Korea’s participation in US-led chip alliance" (2022)[URL]
- "BIMP-EAGA Maritime 2023 effort to become global logistics power: Govt" (2023)[URL]
- Kahler, M, "Multilateralism with small and large numbers", International Organization, 46(3), pp.681~708 (1992)
- Kim, D. Y, "The Impact of Minilateralism on ASEAN Centrality:Strategic Implication on Korea’s Approach to ASEAN", The Southeast Asian Review, 33(3), pp.1~37 (2023)
- "Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol to attend NATO Summit in Madrid" (2022)[URL]
- Kim, S. M., "Minilateralism Revisited: MIKTA as Slender Diplomacy in a Multiplex World", Global Governance, 24(4), pp.475~489 (2018)
- "Customized Strategies for the BIMP-EAGA Should Move toward the ‘Green Partnership.’" (2023)[URL]
- Kussanti, D. P, "Pengembangan Kerjasama Sub-Regional BIMP-EAGA Di Bidang Ekowisata : Perspektif Indonesia", Cakrawala, 8(1), pp.108~116 (2017)
- "Yoon to depart for U.S. to attend summit with Biden, Kishida" (2023)[URL]
- Minilateral Cooperation in ASEAN May Help it Overcome Challenges in Multilateralism, "Lin, J.", ISEAS YUSOF ISHAK, ~, pp.ISEAS YUSOF ISHAK, 2023(16) (2023)
- McGee, J. S., "Exclusive Minilateralism: An Emerging Discourse within International Climate Change Governance?", PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 8(3), pp.1~29 (2011)
- "Outcome of the 1st ROK-BIMP-EAGA Senior Officials’Meeting via Video Conference" (2021)[URL]
- Moore, T. G., "The Evolution of Regionalism in Asia: Economic and Security Issues" (2007), Routledge
- "Minilaterlaism: The Magic Number to Get Real International Action" (2009)[URL]
- "Korea NATO" (2023)[URL]
- "President Jokowi Attends BIMP-EAGA Meeting" (2019)[URL]
- "President Jokowi: Strengthening BIMP-EAGA Cooperation Key to Economic Recovery" (2021)[URL]
- Stewart, P, "The New “New Multilateralism”: Minilateral Cooperation, but at What Cost?", Global Summitry, 1(2), pp.115~134 (2015)
- The Trilateral Strategic Dialogue, Minilateralism, and Asia-Pacific Order Building (US-Japan-Australia Security Cooperation), "Tow, W. T", Stimson Center, ~ (2015)
- Tow, W. T., "The U.S. and Implementing Multilateral Security in the Asia-Pacific: Can Convergent Security Work?", IFANS Review, 19(2), pp.49~72 (2011)
- Van, J, "Power, trust, and network complexity: Three logics of hedging in Asian security", International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 14(3), pp.331~356 (2014)
