그리스어 필사본 Tractatus Coislinianus 120에 관한 연구
A Study on the Greek Codex Tractatus Coislinianus 120
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Greek Codex Tractatus Coislinianus 120 is very important and valuable manuscript that is supposed to include the content of Aristotle’s lost Poetics book II. This article provides a philologically edited Greek text and Korean translation. This codex has attracted the attention of classical scholars since 1839. It was found by J.A. Cramer and, after philological examination, was published. He maintained that Tractatus Coislinianus 120 is intimately related to the theory on Greek comedy, especially to Aristotle’s poetic theory. However, his opinion has not gained strong support from classical philologists because many scholars believe that Aristotle did not author the original text of this manuscipt and that the content does not correspond to the Aristotelian philosophy and view of literature. But L. Cooper and R. Janko maintained a positive position about the Tractatus Coislinianus 120 in relation to Aristotle’sexistent Poetics. R. Janko is especially convinced that Aristotle’s Poetics Book II existed in the past and this manuscript is its summary. Accordingly, he attempted to reconstruct Aristotle’s Poetics II on the basis of this codex. However, the success of his attempt is still controversial.
Abstract
The Greek Codex Tractatus Coislinianus 120 is very important and valuable manuscript that is supposed to include the content of Aristotle’s lost Poetics book II. This article provides a philologically edited Greek text and Korean translation. This codex has attracted the attention of classical scholars since 1839. It was found by J.A. Cramer and, after philological examination, was published. He maintained that Tractatus Coislinianus 120 is intimately related to the theory on Greek comedy, especially to Aristotle’s poetic theory. However, his opinion has not gained strong support from classical philologists because many scholars believe that Aristotle did not author the original text of this manuscipt and that the content does not correspond to the Aristotelian philosophy and view of literature. But L. Cooper and R. Janko maintained a positive position about the Tractatus Coislinianus 120 in relation to Aristotle’sexistent Poetics. R. Janko is especially convinced that Aristotle’s Poetics Book II existed in the past and this manuscript is its summary. Accordingly, he attempted to reconstruct Aristotle’s Poetics II on the basis of this codex. However, the success of his attempt is still controversial.
참고문헌 (38)
- 김헌, "아리스토텔레스의 『시학』에 나타난 창작의 원리", 지중해지역연구, 11(1), pp.61~103 (2009), 지중해지역원
- 김헌, "서양 고전문헌학에서 텍스트 재구성과 해석의 태도 －아리스토텔레스의 『시학』 을 예시로－", 해석학연구, (24), pp.1~37 (2009), 한국해석학회
- 김헌, "아리스토텔레스의『시학』제2권의 실재 가능성에 관한 문헌학적 연구", 서양고전학연구, (41), pp.89~121 (2010), 한국서양고전학회
- Arndt, E, "De ridiculi doctrina rhetorica" (1904), Bonn
- Atkin, J. W. H, "Literary Criticism in Antiquity II" (1934), Cambridge
- Bernay, J, "Eränzung zu Aristoteles’ Poetik, in Zwei Abhandlungen über die Aristotelische Theorie des Drama" (1880), Berlin
- Bywater, I, "Aristotle on the Art of Poetry" (1909), Oxford
- Cantarella, R, "I “libri” della Poetica di Aristotele", Rend. Ac. Lincei, 30, pp.289~297 (1975)
- Copper, L, "An Aristotelian Theory of Comedy with an Adaptation of the Poetics and a Translation of the ‘Tractatus Coislinianus’. New York", ~ (1922)
- Cramer, J. A, "Anecdota Graeca e Codd. Manuscriptis Bibliothecae Regiae Parisiensis" (1839), Oxford
- D’Alton, J. F, "Roman Literary Theory and Criticism" (1931), London
- Devreesse,R, "Bibliothèque Nationale, Catalogue des Manuscrits grecs II" (1945), le Fonds Coislin
- Dosi, A, "Sulle trace della Poetica di Thefrasto", Rendiconti dell’Instituo Lombardo, Classe di Lettere, Scienze morali e storiche, 94, pp.599~672 (1960)
- Dover, K. J, "Aristophanic Comedy" (1972), Berkeley
- Duckworth, G. E, "The Nature of Roman Comedy" (1952), Princeton
- Else, G. F, "Aristotle’s Poetics: the Argument" (1957), Cambridge Mass
- Feibleman, J. K, "In Praise of Comedy, A Study in its theory and practice. London", ~
- Fuhrmann, M, "Einführung in die antike Dichtungstheorie" (1973), Darmstadt
- Gallavotti, C, "Aristotele" (1974), Poetica
- Glibert-Thirry, A, "Pseudo-Andronicus of Rhodes" (1977), Leiden
- Grosch, G, "De Codice Coisliniano 120" (1886), Jena
- Grube, G. M. A, "The Greek and Roman Critics" (1965), London
- Gudeman, A, "Aristoteles" (1934), Berlin-Leipzig
- Comedy: the Irrational Vision, "Comedy:the Irrational Vision,Ithaca:N.Y" (1975), Ithaca
- Janko, R, "Aristotle on Comedy" (1984), Berkeley
- Janko, R, "Aristotle Poetics with the Tractatus Coislinianus, reconstruction of Poetics II, and the fragments of the On Poets" (1987), Cambridge
- Kaibel. G, "Comicorum Graecorum Fragmenta. vol. I" (1889), Berlin
- Kassel, R, "Aristotelis de Arte Poetica" (1966), Oxford
- Kayser, J, "De Veterum Arte Poetica Quaestiones Selectae" (1906), Leipzig
- Lucas, D. W, "Aristotle" (1968), Poetics
- Nesselrath, H. -G, "Die attische mittlere Komodie: ihre Stellung in der antiken Literaturkritik und Literaturgeschichte" (1990), New York
- Plebe, A, "La theoria del comico da Aristotele a Plutraco" (1952), Turin
- Rostagni, A, "Aristotele ed aristotelismo nella estetica antica", Studi it. di Filol. cl. N.S., 2, pp.1~147 (1922)
- Russell, D. A, "Criticism in Antiquity" (1981), London
- Rutherforth, W. G, "A Chapter in the History of Annotation; being Scholia Aristophanica. Vol. III" (1905), London
- Starkie, W. J. M, "An Aristotelian analysis of “the comic", Hermathena, 42, pp.26~51 (1920)
- Swabey, M. C, "Comic Laughter: a Philosophical Survey" (1961), New Haven
- Vahlen, J, "Aristotelis de arte poetica liber" (1885), Leipzig