본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Case Study for the Legislation of Criminal Laws in the Early Joseon Dynasty

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In this paper, I discuss the legislation of criminal laws in the early Joseon dynasty through a case study. It was the homicide case between two brothers in 1478(the 9th year of King Seongjong’s reign). Despite the simplicity of the case, almost 40 higher officials in the royal court participated in the discussion of the case. The reason why the higher officials took the case seriously was that the older brother was a son by a concubine and the younger was a son by the legal wife. There was a deep and rigorous distinction between sons by the legal wife and sons by concubines in the Joseon dynasty. The higher officials thought that the social status order by birth legitimacy was not reflected adequately in The Great Ming Code, the basic criminal code in the Joseon dynasty. They reinterpreted the case from various perspectives in order to establish the firm social status order between sons by the legal wife and sons by concubines. Not only the number of higher officials participating in the discussion, but also the different legal opinions presented in the royal presence exemplify the process and the reasoning of making new criminal laws in the early Joseon dynasty.

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss the legislation of criminal laws in the early Joseon dynasty through a case study. It was the homicide case between two brothers in 1478(the 9th year of King Seongjong’s reign). Despite the simplicity of the case, almost 40 higher officials in the royal court participated in the discussion of the case. The reason why the higher officials took the case seriously was that the older brother was a son by a concubine and the younger was a son by the legal wife. There was a deep and rigorous distinction between sons by the legal wife and sons by concubines in the Joseon dynasty. The higher officials thought that the social status order by birth legitimacy was not reflected adequately in The Great Ming Code, the basic criminal code in the Joseon dynasty. They reinterpreted the case from various perspectives in order to establish the firm social status order between sons by the legal wife and sons by concubines. Not only the number of higher officials participating in the discussion, but also the different legal opinions presented in the royal presence exemplify the process and the reasoning of making new criminal laws in the early Joseon dynasty.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Lee Jongil, "Study on the evolution of social status for the Suh-er during the Yi dynasty", Ph.D., pp.1988
  2. Ji Seungjong, "The status of sons by concubines in the early Joseon dynasty", Society and History, 27 (1991)
  3. Lee Seongmu, "A study of yangban in the early Joseon dynasty" (1995), Hangukhaksuljeongbo
  4. ", Vol. 25, Mar. 10, 1413"[URL]
  5. , Vol. 29, June 25, 1415, , 1415
  6. 庶孼子孫 勿許赴文科生員進士試,
  7. Jiang Yonglin,
  8. , Vol. 1, July 28, , 1392
  9. Cho Jiman, "Criminal law in the Joseon dynasty" (2007), Gyeonginmunhwasa
  10. 김대홍, "조선초기 형사법상 引律比附에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학과, pp.2012
  11. , Vol. 94, July 16, , 1478
  12. 其兄姉毆殺弟妹 杖一百徒三年,
  13. 用大明律,
  14. 凡律令該載不盡事理 若斷罪而無正條者 引律比附,
  15. 凡奴婢毆良人者 死者斬,
  16. 凡弟妹毆兄姉者 死者皆斬,
  17. 凡鬪毆殺人者 並絞,
  18. (Commentary of Zuo). 以賤妨貴少陵長 爲六逆之首,
  19. 凡奴婢毆良人者 死者斬,
  20. Shigeo Nakamura, "Criminal law in the Qing period reflected in criminal cases", pp.194~201 (2004), Seogyeongmunhwasa
  21. , Vol. 72, Apr. 20, , 1436
  22. 若姦緦麻以上親各杖一百徒三年,
  23. Park Byeong-Ho, "Law in the Sejong era", pp.73~74 (2005), Sejongdaewangginyeomsaeobhoe
  24. , Vol. 22, Oct. 27, , 1423
  25. , Vol. 235, Dec. 22, , 1489
  26. 凡奴及雇工人姦家長妻女者 各斬,
  27. 常賤之姦妻母者 斬,

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)