본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선시대의 죄형법정주의의 이념적 기초와 실천적 함의

The Ideological Basis and Implication of the Principle of Legality during the Joseon Dynasty

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

The primary objective of this article is to examine which practical implication based on which ideological base is possessed by the principle of legality of Joseon. In addition, this article seeks to appreciate which values of Joseon's principle of legality can be handed down to today's criminal law, which is equipped with modern rationalism. The article also looks briefly into the exterior of Joseon's principle of legality had adopted for the two subjects mentioned above. Having explored the principle of legality of Choson I concluded as following: Joseon mobilised constitutional governance to implement Confucionism into their social politics. This process caused the criminal law to display more of the doctrin of mandotory sentencing rather than the principle of legality. The substantial reason to advocate the doctrin of mandotory sentencing was to primarily guarantee an equal penal application by eliminating the judge's discretion. Judges planned for an objective and equal legal application to reach the ultimate goal of Confucionism in democracy. This was not a simple principle of division of power, but an expression of love of the people by the king, who was the at the peak of the kingdom's authority. His consideration of an objective and equal legal application had been displayed as the doctrin of mandotory sentencing. In addition, objective law acted as a strict standard for legislative institutions. Merciless punishments sentenced to legislative officials reflects the strict standard, so does their permanent resignation, which limits them from being appointed into office. Like so, Joseon's principle of legality is an important implication which is relevant to today's penal execution of Korea. In the Korean society, the application of criminal law barely reflects the formal significance of the principle of legality, and is distinctly expressed in the famous Korean quote, "yujeon-mujoe, mujeon-yujoe (money talks and bullshit walks)." Furthermore, significant cases of subjective and unfair legal application are being strictly applied in crimes committed by the people, whereas relatively light penalties are sentenced for corruption by an authority or crimes committed by government officials. Korea's distorted criminal policy (perspective), where illegal acts by politicians or government officials are neglected, and law-abiding spirit is emphasised and foced upon the citizen, must seek for basic reconsideration from its past through Joseon's principle of legality.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 서일교, "조선왕조형사제도의 연구" (1974), 박영사
  2. 김비환, "경국대전체제에 나타난 유교적 법치주의의 구조와 성격 『조선왕조실록』 기사를 중심으로", 성균관법학, 20(1), pp.491~524 (2008), 법학연구소
  3. 이정훈, "조선시대 예의 법적 특성에 관한 연구", 법사학연구, (33), pp.55~
  4. 한국역사연구회, "수교집록", ~
  5. 이정훈, "조선시대 유교적 법치의 법해석론: 조선의 목적중심적 법해석론의 규명", 동양정치사상사, 6(2), pp.164~
  6. 김지수, "전통중국법의 정신", 전남대학교출판부
  7. 홍영기, "법이념 관점에서 죄형법정주의", ~ (2006)
  8. 박종성, "조선은 법가의 나라였는가. -죄와 벌의 통치공학" (2007), 인간사랑
  9. 김성돈, "조선전기 형사법과 형정운영에 나타난 애민적 형사정책", 성균관법학, 20(1), pp.~277
  10. 김비환, "조선초기 유교적 입헌주의의 제요소와 구조: 헌법요소의 화육신으로서의 군주와 권력구조의 상호작용", ~
  11. 이재룡, "조선시대의 법제도와 유교적 민본주의", 동양사회사상, 3, pp.98~
  12. 심재우, "동양의 자연법사상", 고대 법학논집, 33, pp.369~377
  13. 이정훈, "포용적 법실증주의 법개념연구", 박사, pp.2008

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)