본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선시대의 형사제재

The Punishment System of Joseon Dynasty

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Under the Korean Criminal law system, crime and punishment are the means which are developed by a historical awareness of European countries. Korea, however, established an independent Criminal legal system. In the era of founding the State, Joseon dynasty borrowed "the Great Ming Code"(Da Ming Lu) of Ming dynasty of China. After that, Joseon dynasty enacted "Great Codes for Governance of the State", called Gyeongguk daejeon, which was based on Da Ming Lu. Thus, Joseon dynasty had an independent penal code and administered an independent criminal legal system. But some scholars make an objection to this view. The purpose of this paper is to oppose the opinion that Joseon dynasty did not an independent criminal legal system. Also, This paper argues that in order to understand the legal categories, specifically the criminal legal categories, of a Korean Joseon dynasty by the annals of the Joseon Dynasty(also known as the Joseon dynasty sillok). In conclusion, the main purpose of this paper is to redefine the punishment system of Joseon dynasty. Finally, this article argues that the penalty system of Joseon is not a pragmatical system which was based on retributionism but is an inheritable value which was based on an independent criminal legal idealism.

Abstract

Under the Korean Criminal law system, crime and punishment are the means which are developed by a historical awareness of European countries. Korea, however, established an independent Criminal legal system. In the era of founding the State, Joseon dynasty borrowed "the Great Ming Code"(Da Ming Lu) of Ming dynasty of China. After that, Joseon dynasty enacted "Great Codes for Governance of the State", called Gyeongguk daejeon, which was based on Da Ming Lu. Thus, Joseon dynasty had an independent penal code and administered an independent criminal legal system. But some scholars make an objection to this view. The purpose of this paper is to oppose the opinion that Joseon dynasty did not an independent criminal legal system. Also, This paper argues that in order to understand the legal categories, specifically the criminal legal categories, of a Korean Joseon dynasty by the annals of the Joseon Dynasty(also known as the Joseon dynasty sillok). In conclusion, the main purpose of this paper is to redefine the punishment system of Joseon dynasty. Finally, this article argues that the penalty system of Joseon is not a pragmatical system which was based on retributionism but is an inheritable value which was based on an independent criminal legal idealism.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 서일교, "조선왕조 형사제도의 연구" (1974), 박영사
  2. 이재룡, "조선시대의 법제도와 유교적 민본주의", 동양사회사상, 3, pp.99~ (2000)
  3. 박종성, "조선은 법가의 나라였는가 -죄와 벌의 통치공학-", pp.494~ (2007), 인간사랑
  4. 조지만, "조선시대의 형사법 -대명률과 국전-" (2007), 경인문화사
  5. "국사편찬위원에서 제공하는 웹사이트"[URL]
  6. 김성돈, "조선전기 형사법과 형정운용에 나타난 愛民的 刑事政策", 성균관법학, 20(1), pp.277~309 (2008), 법학연구소
  7. 仁井田陛, "中國法制史(第3刷)" (1956), 岩波書店
  8. 박병호, "한국법제사의 시대구분과 각시기의 특징, in 근세의 법과 법사상", pp.35~ (1996), 도서출판 진원
  9. "조선왕조실록", ~
  10. 정희철, "조선시대 형벌제도 및 형집행에 관한 연구, in 조선시대의 규범이론과 규범체계(1권)", pp.383~ (2006), 한국학술정보
  11. 仁井田陛, "中國法制史硏究 刑法", pp.118~ (1959), 東京大學出版會
  12. 김기춘, "조선시대 형전", pp.107~ (1990), 삼영사
  13. 이종길, "朝鮮社會法史攷", pp.89~ (2007), 동아대학교 출판부

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)