China’s Threat Perception and Response Strategy toward the THAAD Deployment in South Korea－Focusing on Power, Identity, Geopolitics Factors－
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This year celebrates the 25th anniversary of the 1992 establishment of South Korea-China diplomatic relations. However, due to the conflict surrounding the THAAD(Terminal High Altitude Area Defense missile) deployment issue, relationship between South Korea and China is said to be going through its greatest crisis since their diplomatic establishment. Since the launch of the then-new South Korean government in 2013, the relationship between the countries were regarded as going through its best period ever; but the THAAD deployment issue quickly cooled the relationship. THAAD deployment was confirmed by the South Korean government as aftermath of North Korea’s fourth nuclear testing in 2016, when the perceived North Korean nuclear threat was at its peak. Since then, China has strongly voiced its opinions, pressuring the South Korean government both diplomatically and in the form of economic retaliation. It is proving difficult to find a breakthrough. This paper points out the importance of accurately identifying China’s perceived threat in resolving the conflict of South Korea- China relationships surrounding the THAAD issues. The purpose of this paper is to analyze China’s perceived threat based on THAAD-related papers published in China, and to understand China’s strong objections towards THAAD. This paper emphasizes that China’s perceived threat is consolidated around the complex interplay of power, identity, and geopolitics factors and that continued academic and policy-related attention is required to accurately understand them. Successful diplomatic solutions might be hard to come to unless China’s perceived threat can be understood accurately.
Abstract
This year celebrates the 25th anniversary of the 1992 establishment of South Korea-China diplomatic relations. However, due to the conflict surrounding the THAAD(Terminal High Altitude Area Defense missile) deployment issue, relationship between South Korea and China is said to be going through its greatest crisis since their diplomatic establishment. Since the launch of the then-new South Korean government in 2013, the relationship between the countries were regarded as going through its best period ever; but the THAAD deployment issue quickly cooled the relationship. THAAD deployment was confirmed by the South Korean government as aftermath of North Korea’s fourth nuclear testing in 2016, when the perceived North Korean nuclear threat was at its peak. Since then, China has strongly voiced its opinions, pressuring the South Korean government both diplomatically and in the form of economic retaliation. It is proving difficult to find a breakthrough. This paper points out the importance of accurately identifying China’s perceived threat in resolving the conflict of South Korea- China relationships surrounding the THAAD issues. The purpose of this paper is to analyze China’s perceived threat based on THAAD-related papers published in China, and to understand China’s strong objections towards THAAD. This paper emphasizes that China’s perceived threat is consolidated around the complex interplay of power, identity, and geopolitics factors and that continued academic and policy-related attention is required to accurately understand them. Successful diplomatic solutions might be hard to come to unless China’s perceived threat can be understood accurately.
참고문헌 (74)
- An, Munsuk, "Why is the US in a hurry for the THAAD deployment?", People and Thought, 229, pp.76~91 (2017)
- Ko, Young-dae, "China’s THAAD South Korean deployment aimed at China; Stability and Stability of the US-China Strategy", Creative and Criticism, 43(3), pp.554~565 (2015)
- Na, Young-ju, "THAAD Placement in South South Korea and China’s Response Strategies", National Research, 67, pp.48~77 (2016)
- Park, Kun Young, "Security and THAAD of South Korea (THAAD)", South Korean and International Politics, 32(3), pp.27~55 (2016)
- 최영미, "한반도 사드 배치를 둘러싼 논쟁과 평가기준: 전문가 조사 분석을 중심으로", 한국과 국제정치, 32(3), pp.57~87 (2016), 극동문제연구소[DOI]
- 박휘락, "한미동맹과 한중관계에서 사드(THAAD) 논란이 갖는 의미: 자율성-안보 교환 모델의 적용", 국제관계연구, 21(1), pp.33~63 (2016), 일민국제관계연구원[DOI]
- Park, Geun-jae, "Controversy and Policy Implications of the THAAD (South South Korea) Arrangement", Strategic Research, 68, pp.37~66 (2016)
- 박광희, "한반도의 지정학적 의미에 대한 중국 정치엘리트의 전통적 인식", 신아세아, 13(3), pp.7~22 (2006), 신아시아연구소
- 주민욱, "중국 신문보도에 나타난 한반도 사드(THAAD) 배치 논란의 네트워크 텍스트 분석", 중국학연구, (78), pp.187~207 (2016), 중국학연구회
- Jung, Kyung-Young, "THAAD Placement Decision and Conflict Management", Military Issue, 87, pp.105~134 (2016)
- Jung, Wook-sik, "The Peninsula after the THAAD Announcement", Practical Literature, (123), pp.142~152 (2016)
- Kim, Yong - Ku, "Traditional Recognition of Chinese Political Elites on the Geopolitical Meanings of the South Korean Peninsula", 13(3), pp.13~ (2001)
- Jervis, Robert, "Perception and Misperception in International Politics" (1976), Princeton University Press
- Walt, Stephan M., "The Origins of Alliances" (1987), Cornell University Press
- Bartles, Charles K, "Russian Threat Perception and the Ballistic Missile Defense System", The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 30(2), pp.152~169 (2017)
- Cohen, Raymond, "Threat Perception in International Crisis", Political Science Quarterly, 93(1) (1978)
- Jervis, Robert, "War and Misperception", The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), pp.675~700 (1988)
- Gries, Peter H., "Problems of Misperception in U.S.-China Relations", Orbis, 53(2), pp.220~232 (2009)
- Hermman, R. K., "Images in International Relations: An Experimental Test of Cognitive Schemata", International Studies Quarterly, (41), pp.403~433 (1997)
- Castano, Emmanuele, "The perception of the Other in International Relations: Evidence for the Polarizing Effect of Entitativity", International Society of Political Psychology, 24(3), pp.449~468 (2003)
- Rousseau, David L., "Identity, Power, and Threat Perception : A Cross-National Experimental Study", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(5), pp.744~771 (2007)
- Wolhforth, William C, "The Perception of Power: Russia in the Pre-1914 Balance", World Politics, 29(3), pp.353~381 (1987)
- 高浩荣, "寄望于韩国下届政府解决 “萨德入韩”不现实", 军事文摘, (9) (2017)
- 高浩荣, "韩国在 “萨德”问题上散布奇谈怪论应予以批驳", 军事文摘, 2016(19) (2016)
- 公子无忌, "韩国新总统,能解决萨德和半岛问题吗?", 中国经济周刊, 2017(19) (2017)
- 寇佳丽, "萨德阴影下的中韩贸易", 经济, 2016(25) (2016)
- 郭 丹, "论 “萨德”入韩对东北亚地缘局势的影响简", 延边大学学报, 2017(1) (2017)
- 郭 锐, "中国在朝鲜半岛的地缘战略选择: 资源基础、目标构想与主要课题", 当代韩国, 2014(2) (2014)
- 董向荣, "韩国决定部署萨德的战略考量与战术安排——兼谈部署萨德对东北亚地区关系的影响", 当代世界, 2016(08) (2016)
- 董向荣, "部署 “萨德”对东北亚的长远影响", 世界知识, 2016(21) (2016)
- 独孤九段, "美韩的萨德反导系统, 对中国威胁到底有多大", 中国经济周刊, 2016(7) (2016)
- 马 菲, "反对 ‘萨德’, 我们斗争到底", 人民日报, ~ (2017)
- 栗 硕, "日本也要部署 “萨德”?", 世界知识, 2017(6) (2017)
- 李沁妤, "“萨德”导弹系统部署韩国的地缘政治学解读", 当代韩国, 2016(4) (2016)
- 王俊生, "面对朝鲜半岛局势中国需保持战略定力", 东北亚学刊, 2017(3) (2017)
- 陆华东, "第三方因素与中美关系的逆社会化——以中国周边安全态势为例", 国际安全研究, 2017(1) (2017)
- 李大光, "“萨德”打造美日韩军事一体化", 中国经贸导刊, 2016(12) (2016)
- 李 枏, "“萨德”入韩:东北亚新冷战格局的浮现?", 世界知识, 2016(15) (2016)
- 李婷婷, "亚投行与 “萨德”:韩国的两难选择?", 世界知识, 2015(9) (2015)
- 刘匡宇, "“萨德入台”: 天方夜谭还是假戏真做?", 世界知识, 2017(6) (2017)
- 刘雪莲, "国家自主性与朝鲜半岛的未来", 东北亚论坛, 2017(1) (2017)
- 刘 磊, "奥巴马政府的全球导弹防御政策与 “萨德”在韩国的部署", 国际论坛, 2017(2) (2017)
- 刘 冲, "美国酝酿在韩部署 “萨德”系统问题辨析", 现代国际关系, 2015(5) (2015)
- 刘清才, "俄罗斯对朝鲜半岛核问题和萨德的立场与中俄战略协作", 辽宁大学学报, 2017(2) (2017)
- 苗鹤青, "“萨德”进驻韩国,威胁中国有多大?", 坦克装甲车辆, 2016(18) (2016)
- 沈定昌, "美国与朝鲜半岛无核化", 东北亚学刊, 2017(1) (2017)
- 薛 慧, "THAAD反导系统中的 “千里眼”——AN", 军事文摘, pp.2016, 2016(7)[DOI]
- 孙绍红, "萨德”搅乱东北亚风云", 世界知识, 2015(9) (2015)
- 石源华, "朝鲜半岛局势的新特点和中国政策调整建议", 世界知识, 2016(24) (2016)
- 石源华, "东亚政治安全格局面临 “冷战化”的危险", 世界知识, 2016(15) (2016)
- 石源华, "“萨德”入韩与韩国的国家主权", 世界知识, 2017(5) (2017)
- 邢 强, "“萨德”导弹:进攻意味十足的防御型武器", 国防科技工业, 2016(4) (2016)
- 杨锡联, "2016年朝鲜半岛形势回顾与展望", 和平与发展, 2017(2) (2017)
- 杨希雨, "“萨德”入韩与半岛安全博弈", 军事文摘, 2016(19) (2016)
- 王世涛, "韩国部署萨德系统对中国沿海弹道导弹影响浅析", 飞航导弹, 2016(9) (2016)
- 丘 山, "“萨德”反导系统遭遇俄罗斯克星", 军事文摘, 2016(7) (2016)
- 虞少华, "重新审视朝鲜半岛无核化问题", 2017(2) (2017)
- 张东明, "中国做好自身定位,再去思考应对 “萨德”入韩问题", 延边大学学报, 2016(5) (2016)
- 张玉山, "“萨德”也是政治问题,不能完全用经济手段应对", 延边大学学报, 2016(5) (2016)
- 张茜喆, "双边层面的思考:中韩关系症结所在和应对", 世界知识, 2017(4) (2017)
- 贺东伟, "“萨德”对中国经济的影响有多大?", 特区经济, 2017(3) (2017)
- 郑兆岚, "美 “萨德”入韩的影响及对策", 国防, 2016(12) (2016)
- 邹治波, "美国谋求在韩部署 “萨德”系统的战略意涵", 当代世界, 2016(4) (2016)
- 朱风云, "美国陆军反导利器: “萨德” 系统发展", 军事文摘, 2016(7) (2016)
- 朱克川, "朝鲜半岛的 “稳”与 “乱.”", 军事文摘, 2017(1) (2017)
- 金东珠, "论朝鲜半岛新一轮紧张动荡局势的成因", 东北亚学刊, 2017(1) (2017)
- 金强一, "韩国部署 “萨德”必将陷入新的困境", 延边大学学报, 2016(5) (2016)
- 蔡美花, "萨德入韩与中国的半岛策略", 延边大学学报, 2016(5) (2016)
- 崔永杰, "“萨德”入韩带来的挑战及中国的应对策略", 政工论坛, 2016(20) (2016)
- 乔 良, "从南海仲裁和 “萨德”部署看美国对华战略图谋", 军事文摘, 2016(19) (2016)
- 祁昊天, "萨德入韩与美国亚太反导布局的战术与战略考量", 现代国际关系, 2016(7) (2016)
- 洪 源, "萨德入韩可能引发哪些地缘危机", 人民论坛, 2016(33) (2016)
- 黄永明, "美国用萨德绑架韩国", 人才资源开发, 2016(21) (2016)
- 胡海洋, "论全球治理过程中面临的挑战——从韩国部署 “萨德”反导系统谈起", 长春教育学院学报, 2016(12) (2016)