간호교육에서의 전문직 간 교육에 대한 현황과 발전방향
Current Status and Future Direction of Interprofessional Education in Nursing Education
2
조회
0
다운로드
34
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examined the perception and readiness of nursing educators regarding interprofessional education (IPE), and discussed the validity and application of IPE in nursing. From December 2016 to January 2017, 239 nursing professors and nurses completed a structured questionnaire consisting of general characteristics, the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale, the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Survey (RIPLS), and an IPE action plan. The collected data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and t-test using the IBM SPSS ver. 23.0 program (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The analysis revealed that 91.6% of the participants had not experienced IPE, and only 11.7% knew about IPE. However, approximately 80.0% answered that IPE is necessary. The results of this study showed that the score of the perceived need for cooperation was higher in nurses than it was in professors, while the score on competency and autonomy was higher in professors than it was in nurses. With reference to the scores on the RIPLS, those of professors were high on the sub-scales of teamwork and collaboration, professional identity, and roles and responsibility. The results revealed that participants considered the upper-grade undergraduate years as the ideal time for imparting IPE, and it was deemed suitable to include communication, simulation, and clinical practice in IPE. Doctors, pharmacists, and physiotherapists were thought to require cooperation for IPE the most. Despite the presence of several barriers to IPE, the participants thought that IPE can achieve learning outcomes such as interprofessional communication and cooperation, conflict resolution, and teamwork. It is necessary to cooperate with professionals in the complex clinical environment as professional areas are specialized and subdivided. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the application of IPE in undergraduate education and in on-the-job training.
Abstract
This study examined the perception and readiness of nursing educators regarding interprofessional education (IPE), and discussed the validity and application of IPE in nursing. From December 2016 to January 2017, 239 nursing professors and nurses completed a structured questionnaire consisting of general characteristics, the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale, the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Survey (RIPLS), and an IPE action plan. The collected data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and t-test using the IBM SPSS ver. 23.0 program (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The analysis revealed that 91.6% of the participants had not experienced IPE, and only 11.7% knew about IPE. However, approximately 80.0% answered that IPE is necessary. The results of this study showed that the score of the perceived need for cooperation was higher in nurses than it was in professors, while the score on competency and autonomy was higher in professors than it was in nurses. With reference to the scores on the RIPLS, those of professors were high on the sub-scales of teamwork and collaboration, professional identity, and roles and responsibility. The results revealed that participants considered the upper-grade undergraduate years as the ideal time for imparting IPE, and it was deemed suitable to include communication, simulation, and clinical practice in IPE. Doctors, pharmacists, and physiotherapists were thought to require cooperation for IPE the most. Despite the presence of several barriers to IPE, the participants thought that IPE can achieve learning outcomes such as interprofessional communication and cooperation, conflict resolution, and teamwork. It is necessary to cooperate with professionals in the complex clinical environment as professional areas are specialized and subdivided. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the application of IPE in undergraduate education and in on-the-job training.
참고문헌 (27)
- Fernandes AR, "Dissecting through barriers : a mixed-methods study on the effect of interprofessional education in a dissection course with healthcare professional students", Anat Sci Educ, 8(4), pp.305~316 (2015)
- Shakman L, "Inter professional education in health care", Int J Nurs Educ, 5(1), pp.86~91 (2013)
- Hammick M, "A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME guide no. 9", Med Teach, 29(8), pp.735~751 (2007)
- 윤병준, "보건의료분야 전문가간 대학 교육에 대한 사례연구", 한국학교·지역보건교육학회지, 11(1), pp.149~158 (2010), 한국학교·지역보건교육학회
- "Framework for action in interprofessional education & collaborative practice" (2010)[URL]
- Stone T, "Evaluation of an international and interprofessional collaboration forum", Nurse Educ Today, 46, pp.10~16 (2016)
- Barr J, "Developing a patient focussed professional identity : an exploratory investigation of medical students' encounters with patient partnership in learning", Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 20(2), pp.325~338 (2015)
- 이영희, "Perception of interprofessional conflicts and interprofessional education by doctors and nurses", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 26(4), pp.257~264 (2014), 한국의학교육학회[DOI]
- Kim HS, "Problems and improvement plans of practice curriculum in health and nursing department" (2013), Educational Research Institute of Korean Council for College Education
- McFadyen AK, "The Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale(IEPS) : an alternative remodelled sub-scale structure and its reliability", J Interprof Care, 21(4), pp.433~443 (2007)
- Curran VR, "Attitudes of health sciences faculty members towards interprofessional teamwork and education", Med Educ, 41(9), pp.892~896 (2007)
- Gotlib Conn L, "Interprofessional communication with hospitalist and consultant physicians in general internal medicine : a qualitative study", BMC Health Serv Res, 12, pp.437~ (2012)
- George A, "Inter-professional education", IOSR J Dent Med Sci, 14(3), pp.35~38 (2015)
- Loversidge J, "Faculty perceptions of key factors in interprofessional education", J Interprof Care, 29(4), pp.298~304 (2015)
- "Accreditation standards and guidelines for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree" (2011)[URL]
- Zorek J, "Interprofessional education accreditation standards in the USA : a comparative analysis", J Interprof Care, 27(2), pp.123~130 (2013)
- Olenick M, "Faculty intent to engage in interprofessional education", J Multidiscip Healthc, 6, pp.149~161 (2013)
- Bennett PN, "Faculty perceptions of interprofessional education", Nurse Educ Today, 31(6), pp.571~576 (2011)
- Mickan SM, "Evaluating the effectiveness of health care teams", Aust Health Rev, 29(2), pp.211~217 (2005)
- Sheldon M, "Preparing rehabilitation healthcare providers in the 21st century : implementation of interprofessional education through an academicclinical site partnership", Work, 41(3), pp.269~275 (2012)
- Breitbach AP, "From buy-in to integration: melding an interprofessional initiative into academic programs in the health professions", J Allied Health, 42(3), pp.e67~e73 (2013)
- Paul Olson TJ, "Surgeon-reported conflict with intensivists about postoperative goals of care", JAMA Surg, 148(1), pp.29~35 (2013)
- Karimi R, "Developing and implementing an interprofessional course and identifying its strengths and challenges", Health Interprof Pract, 1(2), pp.eP1019~ (2012)
- Friend ML, "Critical care interprofessional education : exploring conflict and power-lessons learned", J Nurs Educ, 55(12), pp.696~700 (2016)
- Thistlethwaite J, "Learning outcomes for interprofessional education (IPE): literature review and synthesis", J Interprof Care, 24(5), pp.503~513 (2010)
- Dornan T, "How can experience in clinical and community settings contribute to early medical education? : a BEME systematic review", Med Teach, 28(1), pp.3~18 (2006)
- Gonzalo JD, "Authentic clinical experiences and depth in systems : toward a 21st century curriculum", Med Educ, 48(2), pp.104~105 (2014)