기본의학교육 평가인증기준의 사회적 책무성 반영 수준 분석
Analysis of the degree of social accountability in accreditation standards for basic medical education
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to the World Health Organization, for medical schools to fulfill their obligation of social accountability, it is necessary for medical education, research, and service areas to ref lect the healthcare system’s relevance, quality, cost-effectiveness, and equity. This study utilized Boelen and Heck’s (1995) social accountability grid model to analyze the degree to which the Accreditation Standards of Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation 2019 (ASK2019) standards apply the World Federation for Medical Education’s (WFME) standards. The social accountability characteristics of the former were compared to those of the WFME, the Liaison Committee on Medical Education, and the Australian Medical Council. Experts with experience and certification in medical education and evaluation classified the ASK2019 standards according to the grid model, evaluated social accountability perspectives, and categorized them according to the process, content, and outcome. Of the 92 standards, 61 (66.30%) were selected as social accountability standards; these encompassed all areas. There was a particular focus on outcome-related areas, such as “mission and outcomes,” “student assessment,” “educational evaluation,” and “continuous improvement.” Education and quality were the most common (33, 54.11%), followed by 18 standards related to education and relevance. However, the standards on cost effectiveness and equity corresponding to education, research, and service were significantly insufficient. As a result of classification using a logic model, many criteria were incorporated into the process, producing results similar to those of international accreditation institutions. Therefore, to fulfill medical schools’ social accountability, it is necessary to develop cost effectiveness and equity standards with reference to grid models and expand them beyond education to include research and service areas. Developing content and outcome standards is also required.
Abstract
According to the World Health Organization, for medical schools to fulfill their obligation of social accountability, it is necessary for medical education, research, and service areas to ref lect the healthcare system’s relevance, quality, cost-effectiveness, and equity. This study utilized Boelen and Heck’s (1995) social accountability grid model to analyze the degree to which the Accreditation Standards of Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation 2019 (ASK2019) standards apply the World Federation for Medical Education’s (WFME) standards. The social accountability characteristics of the former were compared to those of the WFME, the Liaison Committee on Medical Education, and the Australian Medical Council. Experts with experience and certification in medical education and evaluation classified the ASK2019 standards according to the grid model, evaluated social accountability perspectives, and categorized them according to the process, content, and outcome. Of the 92 standards, 61 (66.30%) were selected as social accountability standards; these encompassed all areas. There was a particular focus on outcome-related areas, such as “mission and outcomes,” “student assessment,” “educational evaluation,” and “continuous improvement.” Education and quality were the most common (33, 54.11%), followed by 18 standards related to education and relevance. However, the standards on cost effectiveness and equity corresponding to education, research, and service were significantly insufficient. As a result of classification using a logic model, many criteria were incorporated into the process, producing results similar to those of international accreditation institutions. Therefore, to fulfill medical schools’ social accountability, it is necessary to develop cost effectiveness and equity standards with reference to grid models and expand them beyond education to include research and service areas. Developing content and outcome standards is also required.
참고문헌 (31)
- Global strategy for health for all by the year 2000, "World Health Organization", World Health Organization, 90~ (1981)
- "Defining and measuring the social accountability of medical schools" (1995)[URL]
- Charles Boelen, "La stratégie de l'OMS « Vers l'Unité Pour la Santé » et la responsabilité sociale des facultés de médecine", Santé Publique, 15(HS), pp.137~145 (2003), CAIRN[DOI]
- Charles Boelen, "Building a Socially Accountable Health Professions School: Towards Unity For Health", Education for Health: Change in Learning & Practice, 17(2), pp.223~231 (2004)[DOI]
- Boelen C, "Social accountability and accreditation : a new frontier for educational institutions", Med Educ, 43(9), pp.887~894 (2009)[DOI]
- 길윤민, "의과대학의 사회적 책무성: 개념과 실천전략", 의학교육논단, 21(3), pp.127~136 (2019), 연세대학교 의과대학[DOI]
- "Global Consensus for Social Accountability of Medical Schools" (2010)[URL]
- Charles Boelen, "Why should social accountability be a benchmark for excellence in medical education?", Educación Médica, 17(3), pp.101~105 (2016), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Ingrid Philibert, "Responsiveness to societal needs in postgraduate medical education: the role of accreditation", BMC Medical Education, 20(S1), pp.309~ (2020), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Nihar Ranjan Dash, "Evaluation of the integration of social accountability values into medical education using a problem-based learning curriculum", BMC Medical Education, 22(1), pp.181~ (2022), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- 임기영, "의학교육 평가인증의 미래를 위한 제언", 의학교육논단, 22(1), pp.28~31 (2020), 연세대학교 의과대학[DOI]
- 양은배, "미래 의학교육을 위한 다섯 가지 제언", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 26(3), pp.167~178 (2014), 한국의학교육학회[DOI]
- 맹광호, "한국의학교육 평가인증제도의 역사와 의미: 의학교육 평가인증제 도입 배경 및 초창기 활동을 중심으로", 의학교육논단, 22(1), pp.1~8 (2020), 연세대학교 의과대학[DOI]
- Sangmi T. Lee, "Factors affecting social accountability of medical schools in the Korean context: exploratory factor and multiple regression analyses", Medical Education Online, 27(1), pp.2054049~ (2022), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- 안덕선, "Current trend of accreditation within medical education", Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 17, pp.1~7 (2020), 한국보건의료인국가시험원[DOI]
- 유효현, "Changes in the accreditation standards of medical schools by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation from 2000 to 2019", Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 17, pp.1~10 (2020), 한국보건의료인국가시험원[DOI]
- Stefan Lindgren, "Social accountability of medical education: Aspects on global accreditation", Medical Teacher, 33(8), pp.667~672 (2011), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Abdalla ME, "Social Accountability of Medical Schools : do accreditation standards help promote the concept?", J Case Stud Accredit Assess, 3, pp.1~12 (2014)
- Robert Woollard, "Accrediting excellence for a medical school's impact on population health", Education for Health, 32(1), pp.41~48 (2019), The Network: Towards Unity for Health[DOI]
- "Basic medical education:WFME global standards for quality improvement" (2003)[URL]
- "Functions and structure of a medical school: standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to MD degree" (2008)[URL]
- "Assessment and accreditation of medical schools: standards and procedures" (2002)[URL]
- "CACMS Standards and Elements" (2017)[URL]
- "Standards for assessment and accreditation of primary medical programs by the Australian Medical Council" (2012)[URL]
- "Promoting excellence: standards for medical education and training" (2015)[URL]
- "WHO-WFME guidelines for accreditation of basic medical education" (2005)[URL]
- "Rationale for Accreditation:accreditation" (2005)[URL]
- Abdalla ME, "Suggested new standards to measure social accountability of medical schools in the accreditation systems", J Case Stud Accredit Assess, 3, pp.1~25 (2014)
- "WFME global standards for quality improvement in medical education: European specifications" (2007)[URL]
- "The new standards for accreditation (ASK2019)" (2019)[URL]
- Mark A Albanese, "Defining characteristics of educational competencies", Medical Education, 42(3), pp.248~255 (2008), Wiley[DOI]