본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

Accreditation standards items of post-2nd cycle related to the decision of accreditation of medical schools by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타의약학

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the accreditation standards items related to the decision of accreditation of medical schools by the Korea Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation (KIMEE). Methods: The subjects are medical schools in Korea that have received post-2nd cycle accreditation from the KIMEE between 2012 and 2016. Analyses were conducted for differences in accreditation decisions according to the characteristics of medical schools, sufficient ratios of basic standards items, and correlation between standards items related to accreditation decisions. Results: After examining differences in accreditation decisions by the medical school’s characteristics, there were no significant correlations between accreditation standard items and accreditation decisions. Second, according to the number of schools that sufficiently or insufficiently met each standard item, from the total of 97 standard items, 20 (20.6%) were sufficiently fulfilled by all medical schools. Standard item 2-5-2 demonstrated the highest insufficiency ratio. Third, with respect to the standard item that had an effect on accreditation decisions, standard item 1-5-1 showed the highest correlation with the sufficiency rate. Conclusion: The validity of accreditation standards items was assured as this study evaluated the post-2nd cycle accreditation standards items regardless of each medical school’s characteristics. The accreditation standards items were found to have a meaningful impact on the development of medical schools and qualitative improvement in medical education. The findings are expected to contribute to guaranteeing the validity and reliability of accreditation decisions and raising the quality of accreditation.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the accreditation standards items related to the decision of accreditation of medical schools by the Korea Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation (KIMEE). Methods: The subjects are medical schools in Korea that have received post-2nd cycle accreditation from the KIMEE between 2012 and 2016. Analyses were conducted for differences in accreditation decisions according to the characteristics of medical schools, sufficient ratios of basic standards items, and correlation between standards items related to accreditation decisions. Results: After examining differences in accreditation decisions by the medical school’s characteristics, there were no significant correlations between accreditation standard items and accreditation decisions. Second, according to the number of schools that sufficiently or insufficiently met each standard item, from the total of 97 standard items, 20 (20.6%) were sufficiently fulfilled by all medical schools. Standard item 2-5-2 demonstrated the highest insufficiency ratio. Third, with respect to the standard item that had an effect on accreditation decisions, standard item 1-5-1 showed the highest correlation with the sufficiency rate. Conclusion: The validity of accreditation standards items was assured as this study evaluated the post-2nd cycle accreditation standards items regardless of each medical school’s characteristics. The accreditation standards items were found to have a meaningful impact on the development of medical schools and qualitative improvement in medical education. The findings are expected to contribute to guaranteeing the validity and reliability of accreditation decisions and raising the quality of accreditation.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. 정한나, "Is accreditation in medical education in Korea an opportunity or a burden?", Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 17, pp.1~10 (2020), 한국보건의료인국가시험원[DOI]
  2. 맹광호, "History of the medical education accreditation system in Korea: implementation and activities in the early stages", Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 17, pp.1~8 (2020), 한국보건의료인국가시험원[DOI]
  3. 임기영, "A proposal for the future of medical education accreditation in Korea", Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 17, pp.1~5 (2020), 한국보건의료인국가시험원[DOI]
  4. 안덕선, "Introducing a legal mandate for basic medical education accreditation in Korea", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 28(1), pp.5~7 (2016), 한국의학교육학회[DOI]
  5. Yang EB, "Analysis on the performance and tasks of accreditation system for medical colleges", J Korean Med Assoc, 51(6), pp.586~592 (2008)
  6. Post-2 cycle medical education accreditation, "Korean Institute of Medical Education", Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation, ~ (2019)
  7. Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation, "Rules of the Accreditation" (2017), Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation
  8. 유효현, "Changes in the accreditation standards of medical schools by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation from 2000 to 2019", Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 17, pp.1~10 (2020), 한국보건의료인국가시험원[DOI]
  9. Research Institute for Healthcare Policy, "A study on the present state of medical education in Korea: the White Book" (2014), Research Institute for Healthcare Policy
  10. Hunt D, "The variables that lead to severe action decisions by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education", Acad Med, 91(1), pp.87~93 (2016)
  11. 안덕선, "Current trend of accreditation within medical education", Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 17, pp.1~7 (2020), 한국보건의료인국가시험원[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Changes in the accreditation standards of medical schools by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation from 2000 to 2019김민경, 박원균, 유효현, 윤유상, 이근미, 이종훈, 허정식, 홍승재한국보건의료인국가시험원 · Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions2020 · 제17권 Challenges and potential improvements in the Accreditation Standards of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation 2019 (ASK2019) derived through meta-evaluation: a cross-sectional studyCheol Woong Jung, Chungwon Ha, Dong-Mi Yoo, Jihye Yu, Jun Moo Ahn, Min-jung Lee, Seung-Hee Lee, Ye Ji Kang, Yoonjung Lee한국보건의료인국가시험원 · Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions2024 · 제21권 A proposal for the future of medical education accreditation in Korea임기영한국보건의료인국가시험원 · Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions2020 · 제17권 의학교육 평가인증, 기회인가 부담인가?안신기, 전우택, 정한나연세대학교 의과대학 · 의학교육논단2020 · 제22권 제1호Goodness of fit of the items used in the 2nd cycle of evaluation and accreditation of medical schools by the Korea Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation based on the Rasch model허선, 임만섭한국보건의료인국가시험원 · Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions2019 · 제16권 Is accreditation in medical education in Korea an opportunity or a burden?안신기, 전우택, 정한나한국보건의료인국가시험원 · Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions2020 · 제17권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)