본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

피의자 등 호송제도의 문제점 및 개선방안에 관한 연구

A study on the Issues and Improvement Plans of the Prisoner Escort System in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The prisoner escort service is one of the most simple affairs in criminal justice system, not requiring legal or expert knowledge. But actually, this prisoner escort service sometimes plays a role as cause of conflict among the criminal justice agencies. In Korea, especially between the public prosecutor's office and police agency, the prisoner escort issue has brought serious confrontations and even developed into legal issues. This is a rare phenomenon that is not seen in other countries The root of this problem lies in the issue of whether to allow the police investigative authority independent of prosecutor's office, which is one of the old issues in criminal justice in Korea. So police's refusal of prisoner escort can't be regarded as the mere problem of escort itself, but it is regarded as the police's expression of long-lasting bad feelings against the prosecution's limitless control authority over the police investigation. To solve this problem, we should define the notion of prisoner escort definitely. We should also acknowledge that the prisoner escort doesn't belong to criminal investigation, because it is not identifying and apprehending the suspected offender, and not collecting the evidence to prove him guilty. It is a mere practical administrative service. Therefore it doesn't belong to the scope of prosecution's control authority over the police investigation. The scope of the prosecution's control authority over the police investigation should be interpreted as severely as possible by the court's decision and commentary. This makes the prosecution's control authority over the police investigation sound, and will have good influence on the prosecutor's office in the long term. Laws and regulations involved with the prisoner escort should be modified and the problem that which agency should take responsibility for the prisoner escort in each case should be clear. That will make arbitrary interpretation reduce. After this every effort is made, the cooperation among criminal justice agencies can be possible.

Abstract

The prisoner escort service is one of the most simple affairs in criminal justice system, not requiring legal or expert knowledge. But actually, this prisoner escort service sometimes plays a role as cause of conflict among the criminal justice agencies. In Korea, especially between the public prosecutor's office and police agency, the prisoner escort issue has brought serious confrontations and even developed into legal issues. This is a rare phenomenon that is not seen in other countries The root of this problem lies in the issue of whether to allow the police investigative authority independent of prosecutor's office, which is one of the old issues in criminal justice in Korea. So police's refusal of prisoner escort can't be regarded as the mere problem of escort itself, but it is regarded as the police's expression of long-lasting bad feelings against the prosecution's limitless control authority over the police investigation. To solve this problem, we should define the notion of prisoner escort definitely. We should also acknowledge that the prisoner escort doesn't belong to criminal investigation, because it is not identifying and apprehending the suspected offender, and not collecting the evidence to prove him guilty. It is a mere practical administrative service. Therefore it doesn't belong to the scope of prosecution's control authority over the police investigation. The scope of the prosecution's control authority over the police investigation should be interpreted as severely as possible by the court's decision and commentary. This makes the prosecution's control authority over the police investigation sound, and will have good influence on the prosecutor's office in the long term. Laws and regulations involved with the prisoner escort should be modified and the problem that which agency should take responsibility for the prisoner escort in each case should be clear. That will make arbitrary interpretation reduce. After this every effort is made, the cooperation among criminal justice agencies can be possible.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 강구진, "형사소송법원론" (1982), 학연사
  2. 강기택 외, "비교경찰론" (2006), 수사연구사
  3. 김재민, "경찰수사론" (2003), 경찰대학
  4. 대검찰청, "검찰연감" (2009), 대검찰청
  5. 박창호, "비교수사제도론" (2004), 박영사
  6. 배종대, "신형사소송법" (2008), 홍문사
  7. 백형구, "형사소송법강의(신정2판)" (1996), 박영사
  8. 사법연수원, "수사절차론" (2005), 사법연수원
  9. 송광섭, "형사소송법" (1997), 유스티아누스
  10. 신동운, "신형사소송법" (2008), 법문사
  11. 신현주, "형사소송법(신정판)" (1999), 박영사
  12. 유상현, "경찰행정법" (2008), 법률출판사
  13. 이재상, "신형사소송법(제2판)" (2008), 박영사
  14. 임동규, "형사소송법(제5판)" (2008), 법문사
  15. 정영석, "형사소송법" (1994), 법문사
  16. 정진수, "미결수용자처우에 관한 연구" (2003), 한국형사정책연구원
  17. 강경래, "교정시설의 민영화와 우리나라의 추진상황", 제34회 한국공안행정학회 학술대회자료집 (2009), 한국공안행정학회
  18. 미국 지방검찰청의 조직운영과 수사실무, "김재훈", 대검찰청, ~ (2006)
  19. 김태명, "일본의 대용감옥에 대한 논쟁에 비추어 본 우리나라 경찰서 유치장 제도의 문제점과 개선방안", 경찰학연구, (9), pp.126~156 (2005), 경찰대학
  20. 이동희, "한국 수사구조의 비교법제적 위상 및 개선방향", 경찰학연구, (7), pp.146~190 (2004), 경찰대학
  21. 임준태, "각국의 유치장 운영실태 및 개선방안", 치안논총, 17 (2001), 치안연구소
  22. 황정익, "유치관련 경찰직무상의 법적 문제점에 관한 고찰", 한국공안행정학회보, (16), pp.277~320 (2003), 한국공안행정학회
  23. Hatchard J., "Comparative Criminal Procedure" (1996), The British Institute of International and Comparative Law
  24. James W. Osterburg, "Criminal Investigation: A method for reconstructing the past" (2000), Anderson Publishing Company
  25. Ostrum, E., "Pattens of Metropolitan Policing" (1978), Ballinger Pub Co.
  26. Rolando V. del Carmen, "Criminal Procedure(3rd ed.)" (1999), 길안사
  27. 三井誠, "입문일본형사수속법" (2003), 법문사
  28. Bureau of Justice Statistics, "Census of State and Federal Correctional Facilities", ~ (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)