경찰서유치장 관련법령 및 관리운영상의 문제점과 개선방향
Acts and Subordinate Statutes on Police Custody in Korea
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korean police can hold an arrestee for up to 10 days before they must bring him a prosecutor. Before suspects are indicted, pretrial detainees, in principles, should be held in detention facilities(jail) under the authorities of the Justice Ministry, not of the investigators. However in almost all cases they are detained in police station cells(lockups) for up to 10, or, in special cases 20 days for the police investigation. To make matters worse in the area where the detention facilities are not sufficient, pretrial detainees and unsentenced detainees are held in police station cells, that is, substitute jail. The police station can be provided with a lockup to intern those who are placed in detention according to the procedures as prescribed by relevant acts, or have received a judgement or have disposition restricting corporal freedom. Thus not only the detained suspects but also those who received penal detention or detention in a workhouse, compulsory appearance etc can be interned in police station cells. In Korea the police custody system has been criticised as a hotbed for infringement on the rights of citizens like coerced confession, violation of right to counsel etc. Recently there are some litigation against police because of execution strip search on persons who was detained in police custody. Strip search has been a hot issue in Korean society, because it humiliate detainees seriously. From the viewpoint of police, keeping the safety and order in custody could be a important thing. But Supreme Court and Constitutional Court of Korea made up a strict principles about the body search. Many issues that have risen in the police station cells have its origin in defects of acts and subordinate statutes on police custody. In this study I tried to handle the problems that cause troubles in police jail and to find ways to solve them from a standpoint of legal system.
Abstract
Korean police can hold an arrestee for up to 10 days before they must bring him a prosecutor. Before suspects are indicted, pretrial detainees, in principles, should be held in detention facilities(jail) under the authorities of the Justice Ministry, not of the investigators. However in almost all cases they are detained in police station cells(lockups) for up to 10, or, in special cases 20 days for the police investigation. To make matters worse in the area where the detention facilities are not sufficient, pretrial detainees and unsentenced detainees are held in police station cells, that is, substitute jail. The police station can be provided with a lockup to intern those who are placed in detention according to the procedures as prescribed by relevant acts, or have received a judgement or have disposition restricting corporal freedom. Thus not only the detained suspects but also those who received penal detention or detention in a workhouse, compulsory appearance etc can be interned in police station cells. In Korea the police custody system has been criticised as a hotbed for infringement on the rights of citizens like coerced confession, violation of right to counsel etc. Recently there are some litigation against police because of execution strip search on persons who was detained in police custody. Strip search has been a hot issue in Korean society, because it humiliate detainees seriously. From the viewpoint of police, keeping the safety and order in custody could be a important thing. But Supreme Court and Constitutional Court of Korea made up a strict principles about the body search. Many issues that have risen in the police station cells have its origin in defects of acts and subordinate statutes on police custody. In this study I tried to handle the problems that cause troubles in police jail and to find ways to solve them from a standpoint of legal system.
참고문헌 (25)
- 조국, "경찰서유치장에 수용된 형사피의자에 대한 신체검사", 형사정책연구, 11(4), pp.255~ (2000)
- 임준태, "경찰서유치장 운영실태 및 개선방안", 치안논총, 17, pp.223~ (2001)
- 고시면, "경찰서 유치장 수용과정에서 알몸수색으로 인한 형사피의자의 피해자화에 대한 고찰", 피해자학연구, 10(2), pp.169~188 (2002), 한국피해자학회
- 이재상, "신형사소송법(제2판)", 244~ (2008)
- 황정익, "유치관련 경찰직무상의 법적 문제점에 관한 고찰", 한국공안행정학회보, (16), pp.277~320 (2003), 한국공안행정학회
- 수원, "경찰의 인권보호 향상방안–경찰서유치장 실태와 관련하여–", 전북대학교 사회과학연구논집, (28), pp.12~ (2002)
- 우열, "경찰서유치장 시설 및 운영에 대한 유치인의 인식연구", 한국경호경비학회지, (13), pp.438~ (2007)
- 신용해, "경찰서유치장 및 대용구치시설 관련 판례연구", 교정, 49(2) (2005)
- 原一彦, "佐佐木史朗, 西原春夫 共編", 現代刑罰法大系, 6, pp.359~ (1982)
- 김태명, "미결구금시설로서의 경찰서 유치장제도", 형사정책연구, 15(3), pp.45~80 (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
- 日本辯護士連合會 拘禁二法案對策本部, "解說 一弁連 刑事處遇法案-施設管理法から人道的處遇法へ", 17~ (1994)
- 김태명, "일본의 대용감옥에 대한 논쟁에 비추어 본 우리나라 경찰서 유치장 제도의 문제점과 개선방안", 경찰학연구, (9), pp.126~156 (2005), 경찰대학
- 이동희, "일본:검․경 단계형 수사구조", 비교수사제도론, pp.684~ (2004)
- 신동운, "신형사소송법", pp.226~ (2008)
- 황정익, "유치장설치의 법적 근거와 운영에 따른 문제점", ~
- 이상희, "유치장 내의 신체검사에 대한 비판과 대안", ~
- 조국, "미국법상 알몸수색의 법리와 그 함의", ~
- 장규원, "유치장관리 개선을 위한 방향", 10~
- 이덕연, "유치장내 화장실 설치 및 관리행위 위헌확인", 법률신문, ~ (2001)
- 최복규, "변호인의 수진권행사에 대한 사법경찰관 및 의무관의 참여 허용여부", 대법원판례해설 41호, 771~ (2002)
- 박재풍, "경찰서유치장에서의 인권보호에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2005
- 김남진, "훈령(개발제한구역관리규정)의 법적 성질", 3~ (2000), 5
- 김용섭, "행정규칙의 대외적 구속력 –대법원 1999.11.26.선고 97누13474 판결–", 법조, 50(3), pp.150~ (2001)
- 유치장 시설환경 인권실태 조사보고서, "국가인권위원회", 64~ (2003)
- 김태명, "일본의 受刑者處遇法의 내용과 평가", 矯正硏究, 29, pp.129~158 (2005), 한국교정학회
