본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국내외 조직범죄에 있어 증인 보호에 관한 연구

A Study on Protection for Witness of Organized Crime

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The biggest obstacle to investigation of organized crime is that victims or witnesses evade testifying about details of the damage or crime facts. The reason they evade is that there has been a lot of concerns about revenge and exposure of identity, as well as being overwhelmed about appearing in court and investigative agencies. Revenge crimes has increased year by year, from 104 cases in 2003 to 162cases in 2008, so it is really urgent to protect witnesses, but existing regulations about protecting victims or witnesses are scattered around some investigator special acts, and at the same time, the regulations lack of organization and are not being any effective tools to protect witnesses. Therefore, to deal with organized crime effectively, it is the most important to protect witnesses letting them to testify facts freely. So it is time to adopt some witness protection system such as from United States, Japan, or Germany to Korean circumstances. The system, has to be made to guarantee safeties of victims and witnesses on criminal proceedings, as well as on investigating or judiciary proceedings, and has to reject exposure of identity,cross-examination, face-to-face testimony, or meeting with assailants directly. In addition, the system would have to be able not to make working people get disadvantages from workplaces because of absence for their testimony. Not only with readjustments of related laws, institutions such as the court, the prosecution, and the police have to hold recognition and will act about protection of witnesses, for the particularly crucial part. The newly readjusted system has to let anyone to give evidence about their experiences and to report crimes to the institutions freely, getting out from terror of reprisal.

Abstract

The biggest obstacle to investigation of organized crime is that victims or witnesses evade testifying about details of the damage or crime facts. The reason they evade is that there has been a lot of concerns about revenge and exposure of identity, as well as being overwhelmed about appearing in court and investigative agencies. Revenge crimes has increased year by year, from 104 cases in 2003 to 162cases in 2008, so it is really urgent to protect witnesses, but existing regulations about protecting victims or witnesses are scattered around some investigator special acts, and at the same time, the regulations lack of organization and are not being any effective tools to protect witnesses. Therefore, to deal with organized crime effectively, it is the most important to protect witnesses letting them to testify facts freely. So it is time to adopt some witness protection system such as from United States, Japan, or Germany to Korean circumstances. The system, has to be made to guarantee safeties of victims and witnesses on criminal proceedings, as well as on investigating or judiciary proceedings, and has to reject exposure of identity,cross-examination, face-to-face testimony, or meeting with assailants directly. In addition, the system would have to be able not to make working people get disadvantages from workplaces because of absence for their testimony. Not only with readjustments of related laws, institutions such as the court, the prosecution, and the police have to hold recognition and will act about protection of witnesses, for the particularly crucial part. The newly readjusted system has to let anyone to give evidence about their experiences and to report crimes to the institutions freely, getting out from terror of reprisal.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 2009 경찰백서, "경찰청", 경찰청, ~ (2009)
  2. 조직범죄에 대한 국제적인 대응과 증인보호대책에 관한 연구, "송기오", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2006)
  3. 송희진, "형사절차상 피해자 및 증인보호방안에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2000
  4. 신동운, (2007), 法文社
  5. 양태규, "조직폭력범죄수사론" (2003), 大旺社
  6. 염장호, "세계조직범죄론" (2001), 오성출판사
  7. 임 웅, "조직범죄와 형사법" (2004), 법문사
  8. 김주현, "조직범죄수사에 필요한 제도개선 방향에 관한 연구", 강력검사연구논문집, 4 (1994)
  9. 김영철, "미국의 피해자 및 증인보호방안에 관한 연구", 해외 파견검사논문집, 9 (1993), 법무연수원
  10. 박찬홍, "범죄 피해자 보호대책", 검사 세미나 연수자료집(Ⅹ) (1991), 법무연수원
  11. 송희진, "형사절차상 피해자 및 증인 보호방안에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2000
  12. 안경옥, "독일 형사 적차상의 증인 및 피해자보호", 형사정책, (11) (1999), 한국형사정책연구원
  13. 양태규, "조직범죄의실태와 대책에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2003
  14. 이건호 역, "독일의 범죄피해자보상제도", 형사정책연구소식, 통권 : 52 (1999), 한국형사정책 연구원
  15. 이진국, "독일 형법제46a조: 자율적 범행 원상회복", 비교형사법연구 (1999)
  16. 조균석, "일본의 조직폭력규제법으로서의 폭력단 대책법연구", 형사정책연구, 3(1) (1992)
  17. 진성진, "독일의 대조직범죄 투쟁방안 고찰", 해외연수검사 연구논문집, 13 (1997), 법무연수원
  18. 하태훈, "증인 또는 범죄피해자 보호제도", 피해자학연구, (4) (1998), 피해자연구학회
  19. 三井誠, "犯罪被害者保護のための新法律", 法學敎室, (240) (2000)
  20. 三井誠, "入門刑事手續法, 제3판" (2001)
  21. 大泉隆史, "組織的犯罪對策" (2003), 共犯理論と組織犯罪
  22. 警察白書, "日本警察廳", ~ (2009)
  23. Bottcher, "Der gefährdete Zeuge im Strafverfahren" (1993), FS-Schüler- Springorum
  24. Michael Jaeger, "Der Kronzeuge unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von § 31 BtMG" (1986), Frankfurter

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)