영어 대화연속체에서 한국인 대학생들의 인접대귀 구조 분석
An Analysis of Adjacency Pairs in Sequential Organizations between Korean Speakers of English
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study explores the adjacency pairs in English talk-in-interactions between non-native speakers whose native language is Korean. English oral data from 20 participants were transcribed and analysed, applying conversation analysis (CA). All adjacency pairs were identified and grouped by proficiency level(lower- and higher-) of the Korean university students. The analysis of spoken discourse shows the characteristics of adjacency pairs in Korean speakers(KSs). The results show that the types of adjacency pairs used are very similar between the lower- and higher-proficiency groups. Both groups use many adjacency pairs that were inserted in other adjacency pairs to communicate. The lower-proficiency groups have a tendency to use more unmarked types which are different from ordinary conversation because of incompetent pragmatic competence. Compared with the lower-proficiency groups, the higher-proficiency groups have a tendency to use more marked types which are very similar with ordinary conversation. The findings indicate that pragmatic preference structures should be studied in the skillful use of adjacency pairs in KSs. Finally, this study shows interactive characteristics in KSs, suggesting the need to explore the interaction in KSs for pedagogical implications.
Abstract
This study explores the adjacency pairs in English talk-in-interactions between non-native speakers whose native language is Korean. English oral data from 20 participants were transcribed and analysed, applying conversation analysis (CA). All adjacency pairs were identified and grouped by proficiency level(lower- and higher-) of the Korean university students. The analysis of spoken discourse shows the characteristics of adjacency pairs in Korean speakers(KSs). The results show that the types of adjacency pairs used are very similar between the lower- and higher-proficiency groups. Both groups use many adjacency pairs that were inserted in other adjacency pairs to communicate. The lower-proficiency groups have a tendency to use more unmarked types which are different from ordinary conversation because of incompetent pragmatic competence. Compared with the lower-proficiency groups, the higher-proficiency groups have a tendency to use more marked types which are very similar with ordinary conversation. The findings indicate that pragmatic preference structures should be studied in the skillful use of adjacency pairs in KSs. Finally, this study shows interactive characteristics in KSs, suggesting the need to explore the interaction in KSs for pedagogical implications.
참고문헌 (15)
- Du Bois, J., "Outline of Discourse Transcription" (1993), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Heritage, J., "Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology" (1984), Polity Press
- Hosoda, Y., "Other-repair in Japanese conversation between nonnative and native speakers", Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11(1), pp.39~63 (2000)
- Kurhila, S., "Correction in talk between native and non-native speakers", Journal of Pragmatics, 33, pp.1083~1110 (2001)
- Kurhila, S., "Second Language Conversations", pp.58~74 (2004), Continuum
- Levinson, S., "Pragmatics" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Sacks, H., "Lecture Notes, Irivine", School of Social science, pp.1971
- Sacks, H., "Lectures on Conversation, Vol Ⅱ", pp.521~532 (1972), Blackwell
- Sacks, H., "Talk and Social Organization", pp.54~69 (1973), Multilingual Matters
- Schegloff, E., "The preference for selfcorrection in the organization of repair in conversation", Language, 53, pp.361~382 (1977)
- Schegloff, E., "Opening up closings", Semiotica, 7, pp.289~327 (1973)
- Varonis, E., "Non-native", non-native conversation: A model for negotiation of meaning, 1985, pp.6, 71~90
- Weber, E. G., "Varieties of Questions in English Conversation" (1993), Benjamins
- Wong, J., "Delayed next turn repair initiation in native", nonnative speaker English conversation, 2000, pp.21, 274~297
- Wong, J., "The Token "Yeah" in Nonnative Speaker English Conversation", Research on Language on Language and Social Interaction, 33(1), pp.37~60 (2000)