환유의 경계설정에 관한 연구
A Study on the Demarcation of Metonymy
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to deal with the issue of demarcation of metonymy. It is commonly stated that metonymy is more basic than metaphor. Including this idea, the opinion that metonymy is a cognitive process in which one conceptual entity, the vehicle, provides mental access to another conceptual entity, the target, within the same domain, or ICM is influential on the world of cognitive linguistics. More recent approaches to metonymy stress that metonymy is related to language as well as thought. We can say that metonymy is more basic than metaphor in many aspects. For example, it is said that the whole system of language has the metonymic basis and that metonymy is the basis of all linguistic signs. And metonymy plays a critical role in the process of inference and guides our categorization to a great extent. Generally, metonymy has been overlapped with various figurative languages such as metaphor and synecdoche. In this paper, we consider what is metonymy and what is not metonymy by defining the boundary of metonymy, realizing that the boundary of metonymy may be vague because of its basicness and ubiquity.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to deal with the issue of demarcation of metonymy. It is commonly stated that metonymy is more basic than metaphor. Including this idea, the opinion that metonymy is a cognitive process in which one conceptual entity, the vehicle, provides mental access to another conceptual entity, the target, within the same domain, or ICM is influential on the world of cognitive linguistics. More recent approaches to metonymy stress that metonymy is related to language as well as thought. We can say that metonymy is more basic than metaphor in many aspects. For example, it is said that the whole system of language has the metonymic basis and that metonymy is the basis of all linguistic signs. And metonymy plays a critical role in the process of inference and guides our categorization to a great extent. Generally, metonymy has been overlapped with various figurative languages such as metaphor and synecdoche. In this paper, we consider what is metonymy and what is not metonymy by defining the boundary of metonymy, realizing that the boundary of metonymy may be vague because of its basicness and ubiquity.
참고문헌 (25)
- Barcelona, A., "Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective", pp.1~28 (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
- Bierwiaczonek, B., "Metonymy in language, thought and brain" (2013), Equinox Publishing Ltd
- Evans, V., "Cognitive linguistics: An introduction" (2006), Edinburgh University Press
- Halliday, M. A. K., "An introduction to functional grammar" (1994), Edward Arnold
- Herrero, J., "The role of metaphor, metonymy, and conceptual blending in understanding advertisements: The case of drug-prevention ads", Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 19, pp.169~190 (2006)
- functional research, "Experimental and empirical methods in cognitive", pp.2010, Hilpert, M.
- Kövecses, Z., "Metaphor: A practical introduction" (2010), Oxford University Press
- Kövecses, Z., "Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view", Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), pp.37~77 (1998)
- Lakoff, G., "Women, fire and dangerous Things: What categories reveal about the mind" (1987), The University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, G., "Metaphors we live by" (1980), The University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, G., "More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor" (1989), The University of Chicago Press
- Langacker, R. W., "Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar" (1990), Mouton de Gruyter
- Langacker, R. W., "Reference-point constructions", Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), pp.1~38 (1993)
- Langacker, R. W., "Grammar and conceptualization" (1999), Mouton de Gruyter
- Radden, G., "Cognitive English grammar" (2007), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Radden, G., "Metonymy and in language and thought", pp.17~59 (1999), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., "Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual interaction", Atlantis, 19(1), pp.281~295 (1997)
- Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., "Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective", pp.109~132 (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
- Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., "Metonymy and the grammar: motivation, constraints and interaction", Language & Communication, 21(4), pp.321~357 (2001)
- Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., "Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast", pp.489~532 (2002), Mouton de Gruyter
- Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., "Studies in linguistic motivation", pp.293~320 (2004), Mouton de Gruyter
- Seto, K. -I., "Metonymy and in language and thought", pp.91~120 (1999), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Taylor, J. R., "Cognitive grammar" (2002), Oxford University Press
- Ungerer, F., "An introduction to cognitive linguistics" (2006), Longman
- Wojciechowska, S., "Conceptual metonymy and lexicographic representation" (2012), Peter Lang