개념적 혼성에서 환유의 작용 방식에 관한 연구
A Study on the Way Metonymy Operates in Conceptual Blending
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to deal with the issue of whether it is possible to incorporate metonymy into the framework of conceptual blending theory. It is usually claimed in cognitive linguistics that metonymy is a cognitive process in which one element provides mental access to another element in the same ICM (Idealized Cognitive Model). And conceptual blending theory posits the four-space network consisting of two input spaces, the generic space, and the blended space. At first glance, metonymy seems to be incompatible with conceptual blending theory. Here I will show two ways for metonymy to operate in conceptual blending. The first is the way metonymy operates within one input space, and the second is the way metonymy operates between two input spaces. Especially, for the second way, I will show the first discussion of metonymy in terms of conceptual blending theory by Coulson & Oakley (2003) and the discussion of the relationship of metonymy and conceptual blending at the neural level by Bierwiaczonek (2013).
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to deal with the issue of whether it is possible to incorporate metonymy into the framework of conceptual blending theory. It is usually claimed in cognitive linguistics that metonymy is a cognitive process in which one element provides mental access to another element in the same ICM (Idealized Cognitive Model). And conceptual blending theory posits the four-space network consisting of two input spaces, the generic space, and the blended space. At first glance, metonymy seems to be incompatible with conceptual blending theory. Here I will show two ways for metonymy to operate in conceptual blending. The first is the way metonymy operates within one input space, and the second is the way metonymy operates between two input spaces. Especially, for the second way, I will show the first discussion of metonymy in terms of conceptual blending theory by Coulson & Oakley (2003) and the discussion of the relationship of metonymy and conceptual blending at the neural level by Bierwiaczonek (2013).
참고문헌 (24)
- 임지룡, "‘화’의 개념화 양상", 언어학, 25(4), pp.693~721 (2000)
- Bierwiaczonek, B, "Metonymy in language, thought and brain" (2013), Equinox Publishing Ltd
- Coulson, S, "Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending", Ph.D, pp.1997
- Coulson, S, "Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Coulson, S, "Blending basics", Cognitive linguistics, 11, pp.175~196 (2000)
- Coulson, S, "Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing", pp.51~79 (2003), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Damasio, A, "The feeling of what happens. Body and emotion in the making of consciousness" (1999), Harcourt Inc
- Fauconnier, G, "Mental Spaces" (1994), MIT Press
- Fauconnier, G, "Mappings in thought and language" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Fauconnier, G, "Conceptual structure, discourse, and language", pp.113~130 (1996), CSLI Publications
- Fauconnier, G, "Conceptual integration networks", Cognitive science, 22(2), pp.133~187 (1998)
- Fauconnier, G, "Metonymy in language and thought", pp.77~90 (1999), John Benjamins
- Fauconnier, G, "The way we think. Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities" (2002), Basic Books
- Grady, J, "Metaphor in cognitive linguistics", pp.101~124 (1999), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Kövecses, Z, "Metaphors of anger, pride, and love: A aexical approach to the structure of concepts" (1986), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Kövecses, Z, "Language, mind, and culture: A practical introduction" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Lakoff, G, "Women. fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind" (1987), University of Chicago Press
- Littlemore, J, "Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication" (2015), Cambridge University Press
- Panther, K, "A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation", Journal of pragmatics, 30, pp.755~769 (1998)
- Peirsman, Y, "Metonymy as a prototypical category", Cognitive linguistics, 17(3), pp.269~316 (2006)
- Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J, "Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast", pp.489~532 (2002), Mouton de Gruyter
- Turner, M, "Cognitive dimensions of social science" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Warren, B, "Metonymy in language and thought", pp.121~137 (1999), John Benjamins
- Warren, B, "Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast", pp.113~130 (2003), Mouton de Gruyter