본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

역사 속에서 새로운 창작의 혁신을 찾다 -1984년에서부터 1989년까지의 중국영화-

Having Searched for a New Way for Creation in History - The History of Chinese Cinema from 1984 to 1989 -

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The Chinese cinema from 1984 to 1989 was certainly different from that of the previous period based on the conventions of classical revolutionary realism which had remained dominant in the context of Chinese films until the beginning of the period. It is Deng Xiaoping’s open-door policy of the late 1970s that is the underlying reason for the change. The policy gave rise to a revolution in the classical revolutionary realism which had been formed throughout the Cultural Revolution after the Communist take-over in 1949. It criticized Mao Zedung’s ideology and revolutionary class struggle. It also had a significant influence on the arts and culture policy of the time and raised radical changes. From the late 1970s director-centered filmmaking gradually appeared. As a result, a variety of themes, historical evens, and modernized figures of China came to move into the centre of Chinese arts and culture. Among others, it is the Roots movement that exemplified the changes. The Roots movement is a cultural and literal movement to search for Chinese identity and roots emphasizing local and minority cultures and began in about the year between 1982-1984. It underlaid the Chinese cinema from 1984 to 1989. Therefore, many of the Chinese films of this period reflected the reconstruction of that identity that the movement searched for. Especially, many of directs of the time paid attention to contemporary literature and painting which was not only inspired by the Roots movement. They mainly adapted ideas and narratives from the literatures, and the visual method of the paintings of the time. Their efforts was to restore the Chinese own identity and aesthetic ideas and forms that had been destroyed and forgotten. They came to go beyond the conventions of classical revolutionary realism and began to look at the Chinese history and present from the various perspectives. They were new films which had not been able to be shown in the history of Chinese cinema until the time. This new way of filmmaking was opened by a series of directors who are grouped into the Fifth Generation, Zhang Jinzhao, Chen Kaige, Zhang Yimou, Huang Jianxin, and Tian ZhuanZhuang. The cinema of the time, however, were shaped not only by the Fifth Generation directors, but also by the Fourth Generation directors, such as Wu Ziniu, Ling Zifeng, Huang Jianzhong, Wu Tiangmin, Xie Jin, and Xie Fei. Their works cannot be excluded when examining the Chinese cinema of this period. It is a limited and narrow perspective to devote the Chinese cinema of the period to the Fifth Generation. This essay examines the underlying reasons for overcoming the viewpoint of representing the history of Chinese cinema from 1984 to 1989 as the Fifth Generation.

Abstract

The Chinese cinema from 1984 to 1989 was certainly different from that of the previous period based on the conventions of classical revolutionary realism which had remained dominant in the context of Chinese films until the beginning of the period. It is Deng Xiaoping’s open-door policy of the late 1970s that is the underlying reason for the change. The policy gave rise to a revolution in the classical revolutionary realism which had been formed throughout the Cultural Revolution after the Communist take-over in 1949. It criticized Mao Zedung’s ideology and revolutionary class struggle. It also had a significant influence on the arts and culture policy of the time and raised radical changes. From the late 1970s director-centered filmmaking gradually appeared. As a result, a variety of themes, historical evens, and modernized figures of China came to move into the centre of Chinese arts and culture. Among others, it is the Roots movement that exemplified the changes. The Roots movement is a cultural and literal movement to search for Chinese identity and roots emphasizing local and minority cultures and began in about the year between 1982-1984. It underlaid the Chinese cinema from 1984 to 1989. Therefore, many of the Chinese films of this period reflected the reconstruction of that identity that the movement searched for. Especially, many of directs of the time paid attention to contemporary literature and painting which was not only inspired by the Roots movement. They mainly adapted ideas and narratives from the literatures, and the visual method of the paintings of the time. Their efforts was to restore the Chinese own identity and aesthetic ideas and forms that had been destroyed and forgotten. They came to go beyond the conventions of classical revolutionary realism and began to look at the Chinese history and present from the various perspectives. They were new films which had not been able to be shown in the history of Chinese cinema until the time. This new way of filmmaking was opened by a series of directors who are grouped into the Fifth Generation, Zhang Jinzhao, Chen Kaige, Zhang Yimou, Huang Jianxin, and Tian ZhuanZhuang. The cinema of the time, however, were shaped not only by the Fifth Generation directors, but also by the Fourth Generation directors, such as Wu Ziniu, Ling Zifeng, Huang Jianzhong, Wu Tiangmin, Xie Jin, and Xie Fei. Their works cannot be excluded when examining the Chinese cinema of this period. It is a limited and narrow perspective to devote the Chinese cinema of the period to the Fifth Generation. This essay examines the underlying reasons for overcoming the viewpoint of representing the history of Chinese cinema from 1984 to 1989 as the Fifth Generation.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 毛澤東, "毛澤東의 문학예술론" (1989), 논장
  2. 李澤厚, "中國美學史" (1992), 대한교과서 주식회사
  3. 임두빈, "세계관으로서의 미술론" (1999), 서문당
  4. 張法, "동양과 서양, 그리고 미학" (1999), 푸른숲
  5. Stefan Kramer, "중국영화사" (2000), 이산
  6. 김시준, "중국당대문학사조사연구" (2000), 서울대학교 출판부
  7. 서진영, "현대중국 정치론" (1997), 나남출판사
  8. 서진영, "21세기 중국정치" (2008), 폴리테이아
  9. 정영호, "중국영화사의 이해" (2006), 전남대학교 출판부
  10. 김영문, "등샤오핑과 중국정치" (2007), 탐구당
  11. 장동천, "영화와 현대중국" (2008), 고려대학교 출판부
  12. 한국 중국현대문학학회, "중국영화의 이해, 문학과 영화-장르를 넘어 경계를 넘어" (2008), 동녘
  13. 한국 중국현대문학학회, "문학과 영화-중국영화의 각색과 전환" (2008), 동녘
  14. Xudong Zhang, "Chinese Modernism in The Era of Reforms" (1997), Duke University Press
  15. 전평국, "중국 제 5세대 영화의 영상미학적 연구", 박사, pp.1997
  16. 임대근, "중국영화 세대론 비판", 중국학연구, (31), pp.121~148 (2005), 중국학연구회
  17. 임대근, "‘붉은 수수밭’ : 모옌(莫言)과 장이머우(張藝謀) 혹은 소설과 영화에 관한 어떤 탐구", 중국연구, 36, pp.155~170 (2005), 중국연구소

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)