본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

선행어에 따른 문법적 결속고리 전환연구: 영한번역을 중심으로

The Relationship between the Number of Lexical Units in Antecedents and Grammatical Cohesion Shifts in English-Korean translation.

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

This paper attempts to examine the potential differences in grammatical cohesion shifts caused by the number of lexical units in antecedents between a set of English source texts and their Korean translations and to explore the nature of motivations behind these shifts. Two types of shift are expected to occur: language-oriented cohesion shifts, motivated by systemic differences between the two languages, and translation-oriented cohesion shifts, caused by the translation process. Identification of language-oriented cohesion shifts presupposes the recognition of intrinsic cohesion differences between Korean and English. To do this, a set of Korean comparable texts are analysed. The analysis reveals that the number of lexical units in antecedents influences the cohesion pattern in each type of text. The English source texts use far more percentage of the grammatical cohesive devices than the Korean comparable texts if the antecedent is a single lexical unit. The English source and the Korean comparable texts use about the same percentage of grammatical cohesive devices if the antecedent is more than one lexical unit. In Korean target texts, the percentage of grammatical cohesive devices falls about the half from the source texts regardless of the number of lexical units in antecedents. This is probably because the translators attempt to mediate the cohesion pattern differences between the English source and the Korean target but still under the influence of interference from the source texts on the one hand; and probably because the translators are not aware of the cohesion pattern differences caused by the number of lexical units in antecedents on the other.

Abstract

This paper attempts to examine the potential differences in grammatical cohesion shifts caused by the number of lexical units in antecedents between a set of English source texts and their Korean translations and to explore the nature of motivations behind these shifts. Two types of shift are expected to occur: language-oriented cohesion shifts, motivated by systemic differences between the two languages, and translation-oriented cohesion shifts, caused by the translation process. Identification of language-oriented cohesion shifts presupposes the recognition of intrinsic cohesion differences between Korean and English. To do this, a set of Korean comparable texts are analysed. The analysis reveals that the number of lexical units in antecedents influences the cohesion pattern in each type of text. The English source texts use far more percentage of the grammatical cohesive devices than the Korean comparable texts if the antecedent is a single lexical unit. The English source and the Korean comparable texts use about the same percentage of grammatical cohesive devices if the antecedent is more than one lexical unit. In Korean target texts, the percentage of grammatical cohesive devices falls about the half from the source texts regardless of the number of lexical units in antecedents. This is probably because the translators attempt to mediate the cohesion pattern differences between the English source and the Korean target but still under the influence of interference from the source texts on the one hand; and probably because the translators are not aware of the cohesion pattern differences caused by the number of lexical units in antecedents on the other.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 국립국어연구원, "영어 한국어 번역의 언어학적 연구" (1994), 계문사
  2. 국립국어연구원, "번역문체의 역사적 연구" (1994), 계문사
  3. 김미형, "한국어 대명사" (1995), 한신문화사
  4. 김일웅, "대명사의 생략현상", 언어학연구, 7, pp.1~20 (1984)
  5. 김정우, "국어 교과서의 외국어 번역투에 대한 종합적 고찰", 배달말, (33), pp.143~167 (2003), 배달말학회
  6. 김혜영, "국어 번역문과 번역 글쓰기" (2009), 한국문화사
  7. 박영목, "영문 번역문체의 생성 요인과 그 양상" (1994), 대한교과서
  8. 박영환, "국어의 대용 현상. 국어학 신연구", pp.374~386 (1986), 탑출판사
  9. 서정수, "현대 국어문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
  10. 양명희, "국어대용어의 특성과 기능", 국어학, 24, pp.259~289 (1994)
  11. 양명희, "영한 번역 기사문의 응결 장치에 대하여", 텍스트언어학, 15, pp.199~223 (2003), 한국텍스트언어학회
  12. 이근희, "이근희의 번역산책 : 번역투에서 번역의 전략까지" (2005), 한국문화사
  13. 이상원, "나는 왜 '그녀'를 꺼리는가", 통역과 번역, 14(1), pp.193~211 (2012), 한국통역번역학회
  14. 이희재, "번역의 탄생" (2009), 교양인
  15. 채서영, "영시 번역에 나타난 한국어 2인칭 대명사의 사용양상", 언어와언어학, (44), pp.235~260 (2009), 언어연구소
  16. 韓載賢, "생략과 대용 현상 : 한국어와 영어를 중심으로", 박사, pp.1980
  17. Beaugrande, R. de, "Introduction to Text Linguistics" (1981), Longman
  18. Berber, S., "Patterns of Lexis in Original and Translated Business Reports: Textual Differences and Similarities, In Translating Sensitive Texts: Linguistic Aspects", pp.147~153 (1996), Rodopi
  19. Blum-Kulka, S., "Shifts of Cohesion and Coherence in Translation, In Interlingual and Interculatural Communication: Discourse and Cognition in Translation and Second Language Acquisition Studies", pp.17~35 (1986), Gunter Narr
  20. Carrell, P. L., "Cohesion Is Not Coherence", Tesol Quarterly, 16(4), pp.479~488 (1982)
  21. El-Shiyab, S., "Lexical Cohesion with Reference to the Identity Chain : Application of(IC)to Different Types of Arabic Texts", IRAL, 35(3), pp.211~223 (1997)
  22. Folkart, B., "Cohesion and the teaching of translation", Meta, 33(2), pp.142~155 (1988)
  23. Halliday, M.A.K., "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman
  24. Halliday, M. A. K., "Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective" (1989), Oxford University Press
  25. Hasan, R., "Coherence and Cohesive Harmony, In Understanding Reading Comprehension: Cognition, Language, and the Structure of Prose", pp.181~219 (1984), International Reading Association
  26. Hoey, M., "Patterns of Lexis in Text" (1991), Oxford University Press
  27. Karoly, K., "The Role of Lexical Repetition in Text, Eötvös Loránd University", 박사, pp.1998
  28. Kirk, S., "Contrastive Analysis of Cohesive Patterns of English Source and Korean Target" (2010), Hankook Publishing Co
  29. Kirk, S., "Text and Textuality" (2001), Hankook Publishing Co
  30. Klaudy, K., "Back-Translation as a Tool for Detecting Explicitation Strategies in Translation, In Translation Studies in Hungary", pp.99~114 (1996), Scholastica
  31. Lotfipour-Saedi, K., "Lexical cohesion and translation equivalence", META, 42(1), pp.185~192 (1997)
  32. Morgan, J., "Discourse and linguistic theory, In Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension", pp.165~200 (1980), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  33. Stoddard, S., "Text and Texture : Patterns of Cohesion" (1991), Ablex Publishing Corporation
  34. Tierney, R. J., "Cohesion and Textual Coherence", Research in the Teaching of English, 17(3), pp.215~229 (1983)
  35. Toury, G., "What are Descriptive Studies into Translation Likely to Yield Apart from Isolated Description?, In Translation Studies: The State of the Art: Proceedings of the First James S. Holmes Symposium on Translation Studies" (1991), Rodopi
  36. Toury, G., "Descriptive Translation studies and beyond" (1995), John Benjamins
  37. Tyler, A., "The Role of Repetition in Perceptions of Discourse Coherence", Journal of Pragmatics, 21, pp.671~688 (1994)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)