본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

19세기 ‘퇴폐적’ 댄디를 통해 본 모더니티 연구

Study on modernity seen in the 19th century’s ‘decadent dandy’

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Dandyism represents self-poetry and adoration, playfulness and resistance. Decadence can be seen as the antithesis of Dandyism, where the decadent artist, unlike the Dandy, who strives for elegance and restrained aesthetics, is more inclined to sensuality based on morbid sensitivity, giving himself over to his weaknesses. Whereas the dandy represents a calculated mind armed with outward elegance, the decadent artist is preoccupied with sensuality rather than intellect, chaos rather than order, and beauty through sin rather than morality. Thus, Dandyism, an aesthetic current of the early 19th century, and Decadence, a trend in art of the late 19th century, can be summarized as two distinct phenomena that span a century. However, Charles Baudelaire, Artur Langbeau, Paul Verlaine, Oscar Wilde, and Jean Laurent, who are often referred to as decadent artists, were actually dandies. This study aims to identify the seemingly impossible identity of the 'decadent dandy' and prove that it is a mediator of the social, cultural and artistic causality between dandyism and decadence. Modernity is not a value function of what has already “passed,” but a concept of behavior that changes with the times. It is a “futuristic” concept that is closely linked to ideas of emancipation, growth, development, evolution, and reform, and at the same time opposes ideas of immobility and stagnation, as well as tradition and conservatism. Although the Dandies seem to have gone against the grain to form their own aristocracy, it was a 'resistance' to the shallow age of industrialization and an aesthetic challenge to conformity and uniformity. Decadent artists also have the value of modernity in terms of the decline of 'blood aristocracy' and the emergence of a 'republican spirit'. It reflects the end-of-the-century sensibility that linked symbolism and aesthetic movements together, while also signaling a break from social conventions inherited from the theory of original sin. Thus, Dandyism and Decadence, which are opposed to each other in terms of their aesthetic qualities, leave room to see them as one aesthetic current that runs through the 19th century, as they share the same desire for the 'future', or modernity. In particular, the tantalizing dandies of Baudelaire, Wismans, and Wilde reinforce this phenomenon by presenting themselves as 'paradoxical' as dandies, or 'decadent'. In conclusion, the overly romanticized, overly loose, and overly decadent 'decadent dandy' reveals its value as a figure that expresses modern thought and sensibility in the period from the mid-to-late 19th century to the Belle Époque, as well as a sign of what modernity really is.

Abstract

Dandyism represents self-poetry and adoration, playfulness and resistance. Decadence can be seen as the antithesis of Dandyism, where the decadent artist, unlike the Dandy, who strives for elegance and restrained aesthetics, is more inclined to sensuality based on morbid sensitivity, giving himself over to his weaknesses. Whereas the dandy represents a calculated mind armed with outward elegance, the decadent artist is preoccupied with sensuality rather than intellect, chaos rather than order, and beauty through sin rather than morality. Thus, Dandyism, an aesthetic current of the early 19th century, and Decadence, a trend in art of the late 19th century, can be summarized as two distinct phenomena that span a century. However, Charles Baudelaire, Artur Langbeau, Paul Verlaine, Oscar Wilde, and Jean Laurent, who are often referred to as decadent artists, were actually dandies. This study aims to identify the seemingly impossible identity of the 'decadent dandy' and prove that it is a mediator of the social, cultural and artistic causality between dandyism and decadence. Modernity is not a value function of what has already “passed,” but a concept of behavior that changes with the times. It is a “futuristic” concept that is closely linked to ideas of emancipation, growth, development, evolution, and reform, and at the same time opposes ideas of immobility and stagnation, as well as tradition and conservatism. Although the Dandies seem to have gone against the grain to form their own aristocracy, it was a 'resistance' to the shallow age of industrialization and an aesthetic challenge to conformity and uniformity. Decadent artists also have the value of modernity in terms of the decline of 'blood aristocracy' and the emergence of a 'republican spirit'. It reflects the end-of-the-century sensibility that linked symbolism and aesthetic movements together, while also signaling a break from social conventions inherited from the theory of original sin. Thus, Dandyism and Decadence, which are opposed to each other in terms of their aesthetic qualities, leave room to see them as one aesthetic current that runs through the 19th century, as they share the same desire for the 'future', or modernity. In particular, the tantalizing dandies of Baudelaire, Wismans, and Wilde reinforce this phenomenon by presenting themselves as 'paradoxical' as dandies, or 'decadent'. In conclusion, the overly romanticized, overly loose, and overly decadent 'decadent dandy' reveals its value as a figure that expresses modern thought and sensibility in the period from the mid-to-late 19th century to the Belle Époque, as well as a sign of what modernity really is.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 김경원, "세기말 문학의 새로운 물결 : 상징주의, 데카당스, 모더니즘" (2010), 웅진씽크빅
  2. 오양진, "데카당스" (2008), 연세대학교 출판부
  3. 와일드, 오스카, "도리안 그레이의 초상" (2010), 현대문화센타
  4. 아방가르드, "모더니티의 다섯 얼굴 : 모더니티", pp.칼리니스쿠, 마테이, 데카당스
  5. Balzac, H. de, "Le traité de la vie élégante. in Balzac, Baudelaire, Barbey d'Aurevilly" (1971), Union générale d'éditions
  6. Barbey d'Aurevilly, J, "Du dandysme et de George Brummell , (Édition présentée et annotée par Marie-Christine Natta, le temps retrouvé)" (2011), Mercure de France
  7. Baudelaire, C., "Les Fleures du mal" (1857), Société du Mercure de France
  8. Baudelaire, C., "OEuvres posthumes" (1908), Mercure de France
  9. Baudelaire, C., "gravures de L. Lafnet. Les bibliophiles franco-suisses" (1940)
  10. Becker, K., "Le dandysme littéraire en France au XIXe siècle" (2009), Paradigme
  11. Nordau, M., "Dégénérescence . T. 1" (1894)
  12. Meschonnic, H., "Modernité Modernité" (1998), Éditions Verdier
  13. Palacio, J. de, "La décadence. Le mot et la chose. Les Belles Lettres" (2011)
  14. Schiffer, D. S., "Philosophie du dandysme" (2009), Puf
  15. Schiffer, D. S., "Le dandysme, La création de soi" (2011), François Bourin Éditeur
  16. Schiffer, D. S., "Dans Le dandysme, dernier éclat d'héroïsme", pp.41~62 (2010), Presses Universitaires de France
  17. 류진현, "문화현상으로서의 <데카당스>-19세기말 프랑스 문학의 한 흐름", 불어불문학연구, 58(58) (2004), 불어불문학회
  18. Baju, Anatole, "Le Décadent littéraire et artistique", pp.1~4 (1886)
  19. Bernheimer, C., "Unknowing Decadence. Perennial Decay. On the Aesthetics and Politics of Decadance", pp.50~64 (1999), University of Pennsylvania Press
  20. Doumic, René, "Les Littératures de décadence, Revue des Deux Mondes , 4e période, tome 155", pp.446~457 (1899)
  21. 18 ≫. Coll. ≪ Fins de siècles ≫, "Stéphane Mallarmé et l'idée de décadence, La Culture des idées , UGE, ≪ 10", pp.1900, Gourmont, Rémy de
  22. Karsenti, B., "Sociologie, philosophie : la modernité en question", Archives de Philosophie, 76, pp.547~551 (2013)
  23. Rhodes, S. A., "Baudelaire's Philosophy of Dandyism", The Sewanee Review, 36(4), pp.387~404 (1928)
  24. Rowley, Anthony, "Deux crises économiques modernes : 1846 et 1848 ?", Revue d'Histoire du XIXe siècle, 2, pp.81~90 (1986)
  25. Sfragaro, Adriana, "Littérature et Pathologie", pp.183~192 (1989), Presses universitaires de Vincennes

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)