본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

번역 수용자들은 ‘번역능력’을 어떻게 이해하는가? 인터넷 공론장에서의 번역 논쟁을 중심으로

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

This paper explores the ways in which translation competence is constructed by translation receivers in an online translation debate. Translation assessment in cyberspace is becoming widespread as receivers in the target culture increasingly utilize digital technology to upload content, share comments and posts, and engage in various forms of interaction related to published translations. Based on an analysis of translation debate in an online discussion forum concerning the possible mistranslation of Steve Jobs, the present paper argues that translation competence is approached by translation receivers in terms of ‘representation competence’, ‘communication competence’, ‘consumer satisfaction competence’, ‘subject competence’, and ‘ethical competence’. The findings suggest that the ways in which translation competence is viewed by receivers is a reflection of a complex set of social and cultural demands placed on translations and translators.

Abstract

This paper explores the ways in which translation competence is constructed by translation receivers in an online translation debate. Translation assessment in cyberspace is becoming widespread as receivers in the target culture increasingly utilize digital technology to upload content, share comments and posts, and engage in various forms of interaction related to published translations. Based on an analysis of translation debate in an online discussion forum concerning the possible mistranslation of Steve Jobs, the present paper argues that translation competence is approached by translation receivers in terms of ‘representation competence’, ‘communication competence’, ‘consumer satisfaction competence’, ‘subject competence’, and ‘ethical competence’. The findings suggest that the ways in which translation competence is viewed by receivers is a reflection of a complex set of social and cultural demands placed on translations and translators.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. 김순미, "온라인상 독자들의 번역 비평", 번역학연구, 13(2), pp.7~40 (2012), 한국번역학회[DOI]
  2. 박소영, "번역 능력과 번역 평가에 관한 소고 - 서한 비문학 텍스트 번역을 중심으로 -", 스페인어문학, (66), pp.173~191 (2013), 한국스페인어문학회
  3. "‘스티브 잡스’" (2012)[URL]
  4. 신지선, "번역 툴(tool) 사용자로서의 '번역사 능력(Translator Competence)'의 중요성 고찰", 통역과 번역, 9(1), pp.111~127 (2007), 한국통역번역학회
  5. "돌풍 ‘잡스 전기’ 이번엔 번역 논란" (2011)[URL]
  6. 이상원, "한국 출판 번역 독자들의 번역 평가 규범 연구", 박사, 번역학, pp.2005
  7. 이유진, "번역교수법과 번역능력의 상관관계 연구", 통번역학연구, 14(1), pp.123~144 (2010), 통번역연구소
  8. 이향, "번역능력이란 무엇인가?", 통역과 번역, 8(1), pp.177~193 (2006), 한국통역번역학회
  9. 이향, "번역품질평가의 현황과 과제", 번역학연구, 11(2), pp.107~125 (2010), 한국번역학회
  10. 이형진, "문학번역 평가의 딜레마와 번역비평의 방향", 안과밖:영미문학연구, (24), pp.86~112 (2008), 영미문학연구회
  11. "잡스 자서전 ‘오역 투성이’" (2011)[URL]
  12. 정혜연, "문학번역능력과 습득 - 심리학적 관점에서", 세계문학비교연구, (26), pp.269~301 (2009), 세계문학비교학회
  13. Baker, M., "Translation and conflict" (2006), Routledge
  14. Bateson, G., "Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology" (1972), University Of Chicago Press
  15. Bell, R. T., "Translation and translating. Theory and practice" (1991), Longman
  16. Bing, J., "Talking past each other about sexual harrassment: An exploration of frames for understanding", Discourse and Society, 8(3), pp.293~311 (1997)
  17. Bowker, L., "Towards a methodology for exploiting specialized target language corpora as translation resources", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 5(1), pp.17~52 (2000)
  18. Campbell, S., "Towards a model of translation competence", Meta, 36(2-3), pp.329~343 (1991)
  19. Campbell, S., "Translation into the second language" (1998), Longman
  20. Cao, D., "Towards a model of translation proficiency", Target, 8(2), pp.325~340 (1996)
  21. Chan, T. H. L., "Readers, reading and reception of translated fiction in Chinese: Novel encounters" (2010), St. Jerome
  22. Chomsky, N., "Aspects of the theory of syntax" (1965), MIT Press
  23. Goffman, E., "Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience" (1974), Harper and Row
  24. Fairclough, N., "Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research" (2003), Routledge
  25. Fairclough, N., "Critical discourse analysis, In Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction 2", pp.258~284 (1997), Sage
  26. The importance of natural translation, "Harris, B.", 96~114, pp.Working papers in bilingualism 12 (1977)
  27. Hatim, B., "The Translator as Communicator" (1997), Routledge
  28. Holz-Mänttäri, J., "Translantorisches handeln : Theorie und methode" (1984), Academia Scientiarum Fennica
  29. House, J., "Acquiring translational competence in interaction, In Interlingual and intercultural communication" (1986), Narr
  30. House, J., "Translation quality assessment: A model revisited" (1997), Gunter Narr
  31. Kelly, D., "A handbook for translator trainers" (2005), St. Jerome
  32. Kiraly, D., "Pathways to translation: Pedagogy and process" (1995), The Kent State University Press
  33. Malmkjær, K., "Translation and language teaching. Language teaching and translation" (1998), St. Jerome
  34. Malmkjær, K., "What is translation competence?", Revue française de linguistique appliquée, 14(1), pp.121~134 (2009)
  35. Neubert, A., "Competence in language, in languages, and in translation, In Developing translation competence", pp.3~18 (2000), John Benjamins
  36. Nord, C., "Text analysis in translation" (1991), Rodopi
  37. Orozco, M., "Measuring translation competence acquisition", Meta, 47(3), pp.375~402 (2002)
  38. PACTE, "Acquiring translation competence: Hypotheses and methodological problems of a research project, In Investigating translation", pp.99~106 (2000), John Benjamins
  39. PACTE, "Building a translation competence model, In Triangulating translation: Perspectives in process oriented research", pp.43~66 (2003), John Benjamins
  40. PACTE, "Results of the validation of the PACTE translation competence model: Acceptability and decision making", Across languages and cultures, 10(2), pp.207~230 (2009)
  41. Pym, A., "Redefining translation competence in an electronic age. In defence of a minimalist approach", Meta, 48(4), pp.481~497 (2003)
  42. Reiss, K., "Translation criticism -- The potentials and limitations. Categories and criteria for translation quality assessment" (2000), St. Jerome Publishing and the American Bible Society
  43. Reiss, K., "Groundwork for a general theory of translation" (1984), Niemeyer
  44. Rothe-Neves, R., "Notes on the concept of «translator’s competence»", Quaderns: revista de traducció, 14, pp.125~138 (2007)
  45. Schäffner, C., "Developing translation competence" (2002), John Benjamins
  46. Snell-Hornby, M., "The professional translator of tomorrow: Language specialist or all-round expert?, In Teaching translation and interpreting. training, Talent and experiencee. 5", pp.9~22 (1992), John Benjamins
  47. Toury, G., "The notion of ‘native translator’and translation teaching, In Die Theorie des Übersetzens und ihr Aufschlusswert für dir Übersetzungs-und Dolmetschdidaktik", pp.186~195 (1984), Narr
  48. Toury, "Descriptive translation studies and beyond" (1995), John Benjamins
  49. Tymoczko, M., "Translation theory, In Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics", pp.5928~5937 (2013), Wiley-Blackwell
  50. Wilss, W., "Towards a multi-facet concept of translation behavior", Target, 1(2), pp.129~149 (1989)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)